Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #73228 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-01-09 10:11 +0000 |
| Last post | 2021-01-10 10:58 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 391 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.android
Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 10:11 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Dieter Britz <dieterhansbritz@gmail.com> - 2021-01-09 13:01 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-09 08:16 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 09:34 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-09 12:35 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 11:09 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:49 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:34 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-09 12:41 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 17:47 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-09 14:29 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-09 12:56 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-09 21:29 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 21:03 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:24 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2021-01-09 08:58 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:27 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-09 12:38 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 09:12 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2021-01-09 18:03 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-09 12:16 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:53 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-10 11:45 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 14:03 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 09:54 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 17:02 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 12:26 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 12:20 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 15:20 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 23:29 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 10:38 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 17:40 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 12:52 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 20:08 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 14:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 13:51 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 05:45 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 09:38 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 03:26 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 19:56 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 07:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-14 10:15 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-14 18:42 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 16:39 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2021-01-11 09:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-11 10:27 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 22:44 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 19:00 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-11 10:27 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-11 17:51 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 13:33 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 08:40 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 20:22 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 10:53 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 18:01 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 12:59 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 20:08 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 14:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-10 20:19 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 15:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-12 22:51 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-13 02:36 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-01-13 16:19 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 10:56 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-11 16:34 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-11 10:35 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-11 19:24 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 04:39 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:39 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-09 20:29 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Dieter Britz <dieterhansbritz@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:38 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-10 08:55 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-10 15:41 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 21:48 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-10 19:47 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-11 15:22 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 13:35 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 10:05 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-11 16:20 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-11 13:05 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-11 18:15 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 21:48 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 10:13 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 15:23 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 15:47 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2021-01-12 13:11 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-12 15:02 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-12 15:17 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 10:19 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-12 08:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-12 13:41 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 05:51 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people KenW <ken1943@invalid.net> - 2021-01-12 15:58 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-12 18:15 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 07:46 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 21:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-13 02:36 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 14:31 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-12 14:47 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 15:26 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-12 19:46 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-01-13 08:07 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 08:37 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-13 12:31 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:49 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 11:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-13 16:07 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 18:57 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 21:39 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 22:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 06:02 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 21:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-18 09:10 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 08:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:06 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 12:51 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 09:58 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-18 18:24 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-20 00:18 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-18 18:23 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 14:14 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 13:21 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:42 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 16:16 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 09:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 14:23 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 14:21 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 10:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 15:27 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:13 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:27 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 13:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 15:46 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 09:19 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 13:03 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:25 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 13:38 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-20 21:44 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:44 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-21 19:19 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 11:39 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:52 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:55 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:48 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 22:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:50 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 15:30 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-20 21:46 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:48 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-21 19:20 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 08:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 03:59 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 15:19 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-22 16:35 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:40 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 14:14 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-18 16:17 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 14:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 17:46 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 10:23 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:42 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 14:20 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 17:46 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 10:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 15:28 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:28 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 13:47 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 18:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Leo <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2021-01-18 20:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 20:42 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 17:45 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:18 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-20 00:28 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 23:42 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 17:43 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-19 11:24 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 05:39 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 08:07 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 19:33 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 11:35 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 15:37 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 14:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 14:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 19:54 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 20:00 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:33 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-21 05:46 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 03:05 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 10:29 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:44 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:00 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:20 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:35 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 10:01 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:13 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-21 17:27 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:48 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 15:04 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 10:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 19:25 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 14:33 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 11:57 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:20 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 19:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 19:28 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 20:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 22:09 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 12:01 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:25 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 14:29 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 19:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 15:02 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 11:50 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 12:01 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:31 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:47 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-22 10:06 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 09:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 10:24 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:36 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 13:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:08 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:35 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 11:43 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-23 04:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:46 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 03:02 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:23 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-21 06:06 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:42 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:15 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:47 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 12:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:04 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:20 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:53 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:19 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 19:59 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 15:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 10:32 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 07:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-21 14:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-22 09:33 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 07:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 10:33 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 09:27 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 21:20 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-20 15:46 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-20 14:12 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:52 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:46 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:24 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:44 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:55 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 17:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 12:54 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:07 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:41 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:15 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 19:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:32 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 13:09 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 10:52 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 12:11 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 15:19 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 14:46 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-13 16:14 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:53 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 16:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 22:19 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 14:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-13 13:49 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-13 13:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:40 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 08:15 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Hergen Lehmann <hlehmann.expires.5-11@snafu.de> - 2021-01-13 22:09 +0100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-13 20:17 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bernd Froehlich <befr@eaglesoft.de> - 2021-01-14 08:02 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 09:43 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-14 07:49 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-14 14:43 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Anonymous Reactionary <anonymous@internet.everywhere> - 2021-01-14 23:53 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 12:15 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 14:34 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 21:28 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-14 17:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 23:02 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 19:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 12:17 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:50 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 13:17 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:34 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 12:10 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 08:21 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 13:37 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 10:41 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:16 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:23 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:43 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 11:51 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 16:54 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 12:50 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:21 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 13:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 18:51 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-21 14:13 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-20 19:50 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@removespam.me.com> - 2021-01-15 06:39 -0600
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 18:38 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-15 22:29 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 16:11 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2021-01-15 08:28 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-15 18:42 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-15 22:29 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 16:16 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-15 21:37 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 17:24 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-15 23:00 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 19:29 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 01:04 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 20:49 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 11:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 08:48 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 14:05 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 10:24 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 15:43 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 13:25 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 19:33 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 16:31 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 23:57 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 19:21 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-17 13:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:30 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-17 16:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 11:54 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-18 13:22 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 08:44 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2021-01-16 09:59 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 21:08 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 09:08 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2021-01-16 02:49 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 04:51 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 12:07 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 08:37 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2021-01-16 14:01 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-18 09:59 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-18 13:07 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2021-01-18 12:24 -0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-19 07:43 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2021-01-16 16:58 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-15 07:36 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 03:22 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2021-01-15 11:55 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-16 08:07 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-01-13 13:06 -0500
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 04:16 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-12 22:27 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 11:16 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2021-01-13 02:36 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 15:13 +1100
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 15:19 -0800
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 07:53 +0700
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 13:35 +0000
Re: Washington Post claims cellphone surveillance data is being collected in the capitol to identify people Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:58 +0000
Page 19 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 17 18 [19] 20 Next page →
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-18 11:54 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6k4i5F5dimU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73718 |
"Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message news:ru2kcg$r5a$2@dont-email.me... > On 2021-01-17 2:30 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >>>>>> I actually said that we don’t know what killed the cop and what >>>>>> you selectively quoted was a tiny subset of what I actually said. >>>> >>>>> You said unequivocally >>>> >>>> More of your bare faced lies. >>>> >>>> <reams of your puerile shit flushed where it belongs> >>>> >>>>> that he didn't die as a result of being attacked during the riot. >>>> >>>> More of your bare faced lies. >>>> >>>>> Then you lied about saying it. >>>> >>>> More of your bare faced lies. >>> >>> I asked, "they didn't directly kill him?, and you answered, "Nope". >> >> I said a hell of a lot more than that, fuckwit. > > I never said you didn't. > > But when asked directly if they'd killed him, you answered just as > directly, "Nope". Wrong, as always. I went on to say much more than that, fuckwit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-18 13:22 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ru4u6h$d9e$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73720 |
On 2021-01-17 4:54 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > > > "Alan Baker" <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote in message > news:ru2kcg$r5a$2@dont-email.me... >> On 2021-01-17 2:30 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>>> I actually said that we don’t know what killed the cop and what >>>>>>> you selectively quoted was a tiny subset of what I actually said. >>>>> >>>>>> You said unequivocally >>>>> >>>>> More of your bare faced lies. >>>>> >>>>> <reams of your puerile shit flushed where it belongs> >>>>> >>>>>> that he didn't die as a result of being attacked during the riot. >>>>> >>>>> More of your bare faced lies. >>>>> >>>>>> Then you lied about saying it. >>>>> >>>>> More of your bare faced lies. >>>> >>>> I asked, "they didn't directly kill him?, and you answered, "Nope". >>> >>> I said a hell of a lot more than that, fuckwit. >> >> I never said you didn't. >> >> But when asked directly if they'd killed him, you answered just as >> directly, "Nope". > > Wrong, as always. I went on to say much more than that, fuckwit. What more you say has no bearing. I asked, you answered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-19 08:44 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6mdqaFj416U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73760 |
Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote > Rod Speed wrote >> Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote >>> Rod Speed wrote >>>>>>>> I actually said that we don’t know what killed the cop and what >>>>>>>> you selectively quoted was a tiny subset of what I actually said. >>>>>> >>>>>>> You said unequivocally >>>>>> >>>>>> More of your bare faced lies. >>>>>> >>>>>> <reams of your puerile shit flushed where it belongs> >>>>>> >>>>>>> that he didn't die as a result of being attacked during the riot. >>>>>> >>>>>> More of your bare faced lies. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Then you lied about saying it. >>>>>> >>>>>> More of your bare faced lies. >>>>> >>>>> I asked, "they didn't directly kill him?, and you answered, "Nope". >>>> >>>> I said a hell of a lot more than that, fuckwit. >>> >>> I never said you didn't. >>> >>> But when asked directly if they'd killed him, you answered just as >>> directly, "Nope". >> >> Wrong, as always. I went on to say much more than that, fuckwit. > > What more you say has no bearing. Corse it does when I said much more than nope in that post. > I asked, you answered. And I said much more than nope.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-16 09:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <90qadh-0e8a.ln1@esprimo.zbmc.eu> |
| In reply to | #73682 |
There is no point whatsoever in arguing with Rod Speed. -- Chris Green ·
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-16 21:08 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6fs8oFafakU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73686 |
Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> wrote > There is no point whatsoever in arguing with Rod Speed. Wota stunning line in rational argument you have there, child.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-16 09:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rtv6ir$thk$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73686 |
On 01/16/2021 01:59 AM, Chris Green wrote:
> There is no point whatsoever in arguing with Rod Speed.
The worst thing about him is that he occasionally says something
sensible or useful. I hate that.
--
Cheers, Bev
"When your enemies are making mistakes, don't interrupt them."
-- from the film 'Moneyball'
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-18 09:55 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ru4i33$eg3$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73691 |
On 1/16/2021 9:08 AM, The Real Bev wrote: > On 01/16/2021 01:59 AM, Chris Green wrote: >> There is no point whatsoever in arguing with Rod Speed. > > The worst thing about him is that he occasionally says something > sensible or useful. I hate that. Yeah, occasionally. Arlen also occasionally says something that's true and useful, but it's so rare that filtering him out is the best approach.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-16 02:49 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <0001HW.25B2FC400197858870000591B38F@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #73679 |
On Jan 15, 2021, Rod Speed wrote (in article <i6ff5sF83u3U1@mid.individual.net>): > Alan Baker<notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote > > Rod Speed wrote > > > nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote > > > > The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote > > > > > > > > They might have been in car accidents or contracted COVID-19 | or > > > > > > been shot by a jealous lover. Three people died of some sort | of > > > > > > medical thing (heart attack? stroke?) One cop was apparently | > > > > > > bashed to death with a fire extinguisher and one rioter was | > > > > > > apparently shot by a cop. > > > > > > > > The suicide was individual choice. > > > > > > > > If this is what insurrection has become we're truly in deep shit. > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't understand this attitude, even though I know > > > > > > it's become common. It's like teenagers who burn down their > > > > > > school because they think it's "cool", not realizing their own > > > > > > parents will have to pay to rebuild and that they're causing > > > > > > a lot of suffering for a lot of people, including themselves. > > > > > > Do you think it's OK because you believe Trump is cool and > > > > > > his amorality is a kind of morality? > > > > > > > > > > What gives you the idea that I approve? I disapprove strongly. I > > > > > disapprove of any destruction for its own sake. The cause is > > > > > irrelevant. I think it's much worse to loot and burn the businesses of > > > > > ordinary citizens, but that's not the same as saying that it's OK for a > > > > > lot of stupid people to invade the Capitol. > > > > > > > > they did a lot more than 'invade the capitol'. > > > > > > > > insurrectionists > > > > > > There were no insurrectionists. > > > > > > > violently broke into the capitol > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > with the intent to assassinate the vice president > > > > > > Nope, few were even armed. > > > > So you admit that some were armed. > > Fuck all of them were. > > > Good. > > > Certainly there were messages that have been widely seen that stated an > > intent to assassinate Pence. > > Only by fools. > > > Do you deny that? > > They didn’t have anything to do that with > and he wasn’t even there at the time. > > > > > as well as most, if not all of congress, > > > > > > Even sillier than you usually manage and that's saying something. > > > > > > > in an attempt to overthrow the government. > > > > > > BULLSHIT. > > > > > > > they also caused significant amount of damage > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > and so far, directly or indirectly killed six people > > > > > > Nope, not even one. > > > Really? > > Yep. One of the violent invaders got shot, Correct. She was shot because she was one of a mob with violent intentions. > > the others died of medical incidents. > None were killed by the violent invaders. Three died of various medical emergencies which might, or might not have occurred at any other time, but are likely to have been provoked by the events of the day. The possibility exists that had they not been part of the mob they would be alive today. One of the medical incidents was when an ambulance & EMTs were called for the woman found on the floor of the Rotunda. She was one of the mob and she had been crushed, and trampled by her fellow violent invaders. So far she is one of two who died due to the direct actions of the “violent invaders”. > > > > The police officer who died from having his head bashed in: > > No one had their head bashed in. An extinguisher was > thrown at him and he was fine for hours after that and later > had a medical incident outside the capitol that killed him. He was hit in the head with the fire extinguisher. The injury due to that blow subsequently caused his death. Without one or more of the “violent invaders” directly hitting him in the head with the fire extinguisher he would be alive today. He is the second to die due to the direct actions of the mob. > > > they didn't directly kill him? > > Nope. We disagree, -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-17 04:51 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6gnduFfm00U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73688 |
Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> Alan Baker<notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote
>> > Rod Speed wrote
>>>> nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote
>>>>> The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote
>> > > > > > > They might have been in car accidents or contracted COVID-19
>> > > > > > > | or
>> > > > > > been shot by a jealous lover. Three people died of some sort |
>> > > > > > of
>> > > > > > medical thing (heart attack? stroke?) One cop was apparently |
>> > > > > > bashed to death with a fire extinguisher and one rioter was |
>> > > > > > apparently shot by a cop.
>>
>> > > > > > > The suicide was individual choice.
>>
>> > > > > > > If this is what insurrection has become we're truly in deep
>> > > > > > > shit.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I don't understand this attitude, even though I know
>> > > > > > it's become common. It's like teenagers who burn down their
>> > > > > > school because they think it's "cool", not realizing their own
>> > > > > > parents will have to pay to rebuild and that they're causing
>> > > > > > a lot of suffering for a lot of people, including themselves.
>> > > > > > Do you think it's OK because you believe Trump is cool and
>> > > > > > his amorality is a kind of morality?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > What gives you the idea that I approve? I disapprove strongly. I
>> > > > > disapprove of any destruction for its own sake. The cause is
>> > > > > irrelevant. I think it's much worse to loot and burn the
>> > > > > businesses of
>> > > > > ordinary citizens, but that's not the same as saying that it's OK
>> > > > > for a
>> > > > > lot of stupid people to invade the Capitol.
>> > > >
>> > > > they did a lot more than 'invade the capitol'.
>> > > >
>> > > > insurrectionists
>> > >
>> > > There were no insurrectionists.
>> > >
>> > > > violently broke into the capitol
>> > >
>> > > Yes.
>> > >
>> > > > with the intent to assassinate the vice president
>> > >
>> > > Nope, few were even armed.
>> >
>> > So you admit that some were armed.
>>
>> Fuck all of them were.
>>
>> > Good.
>>
>> > Certainly there were messages that have been widely seen that stated an
>> > intent to assassinate Pence.
>>
>> Only by fools.
>>
>> > Do you deny that?
>>
>> They didn’t have anything to do that with
>> and he wasn’t even there at the time.
>>
>> > > > as well as most, if not all of congress,
>> > >
>> > > Even sillier than you usually manage and that's saying something.
>> > >
>> > > > in an attempt to overthrow the government.
>> > >
>> > > BULLSHIT.
>> > >
>> > > > they also caused significant amount of damage
>> > >
>> > > Yes.
>> > >
>> > > > and so far, directly or indirectly killed six people
>> > >
>> > > Nope, not even one.
>>
>> > Really?
>>
>> Yep. One of the violent invaders got shot,
>
> Correct. She was shot because she was one of a mob with violent
> intentions.
>>
>> the others died of medical incidents.
>> None were killed by the violent invaders.
> Three died of various medical emergencies
> which might, or might not have occurred at
> any other time, but are likely to have been
> provoked by the events of the day.
Yes, bit they were the invaders and so if the
event killed them, that’s because they chose
to be part of the group that violently invaded.
> The possibility exists that had they not been
> part of the mob they would be alive today.
Yes, but like I said, they chose to take part in
a violent invasion so if that killed them, it was
their choice to get involved in a violent invasion.
> One of the medical incidents was when an ambulance
> & EMTs were called for the woman found on the floor
> of the Rotunda. She was one of the mob and she had
> been crushed, and trampled by her fellow violent invaders.
Yes, that is a risk with any violent invasion.
If you don’t like that risk, don’t get involved in violent invasions.
> So far she is one of two who died due to
> the direct actions of the “violent invaders”.
Yes but it was her choice to be involved in a violent invasion.
>>> The police officer who died from having his head bashed in:
>> No one had their head bashed in. An extinguisher was
>> thrown at him and he was fine for hours after that and later
>> had a medical incident outside the capitol that killed him.
> He was hit in the head with the fire extinguisher.
Yes.
> The injury due to that blow subsequently caused his death.
That is less clear. He was quite capable of returning to
his divisional office and had the medical incident there.
He clearly didn’t seek medical assistance at the capitol
and so the head injury cant have been severe, let alone
saw his head bashed in.
> Without one or more of the “violent invaders”
> directly hitting him in the head with the fire
> extinguisher he would be alive today.
That isnt certain. Even an autopsy cant necessarily prove
that, it depends on how severe the head injury was. It cant
have been too severe if he could return to his divisional
office and didn’t seek medical assistance before he did.
> He is the second to die due to the direct actions of the mob.
That’s not certain.
>>> they didn't directly kill him?
>> Nope.
> We disagree,
Yes, but you have no basis for your claim.
It remains to be seen what the autopsy finds.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-16 12:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rtvh1m$ade$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73693 |
On 2021-01-16 9:51 a.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>> > > > they also caused significant amount of damage >>> > > >>> > > Yes. >>> > > >>> > > > and so far, directly or indirectly killed six people >>> > > >>> > > Nope, not even one. >>> >>> > Really? >>> >>> Yep. One of the violent invaders got shot, >> >> Correct. She was shot because she was one of a mob with violent >> intentions. >>> >>> the others died of medical incidents. >>> None were killed by the violent invaders. > >> Three died of various medical emergencies >> which might, or might not have occurred at >> any other time, but are likely to have been >> provoked by the events of the day. > > Yes, bit they were the invaders and so if the > event killed them, that’s because they chose > to be part of the group that violently invaded. And but if the event hadn't take place they would still be alive so they were killed by it. > >> The possibility exists that had they not been >> part of the mob they would be alive today. > > Yes, but like I said, they chose to take part in > a violent invasion so if that killed them, it was > their choice to get involved in a violent invasion. And your initial answer is still bullshit. > >> One of the medical incidents was when an ambulance >> & EMTs were called for the woman found on the floor >> of the Rotunda. She was one of the mob and she had >> been crushed, and trampled by her fellow violent invaders. > > Yes, that is a risk with any violent invasion. And your initial answer is still bullshit. > > If you don’t like that risk, don’t get involved in violent invasions. And your initial answer is still bullshit. >> So far she is one of two who died due to >> the direct actions of the “violent invaders”. > > Yes but it was her choice to be involved in a violent invasion. And your initial answer is still bullshit. >>>> The police officer who died from having his head bashed in: > >>> No one had their head bashed in. An extinguisher was >>> thrown at him and he was fine for hours after that and later >>> had a medical incident outside the capitol that killed him. > >> He was hit in the head with the fire extinguisher. > > Yes. > >> The injury due to that blow subsequently caused his death. > > That is less clear. He was quite capable of returning to > his divisional office and had the medical incident there. > He clearly didn’t seek medical assistance at the capitol > and so the head injury cant have been severe, let alone > saw his head bashed in. You literally have not a scintilla of a clue about head injuries. > >> Without one or more of the “violent invaders” >> directly hitting him in the head with the fire >> extinguisher he would be alive today. > > That isnt certain. Even an autopsy cant necessarily prove > that, it depends on how severe the head injury was. It cant > have been too severe if he could return to his divisional > office and didn’t seek medical assistance before he did. You literally have not a scintilla of a clue about head injuries. >> He is the second to die due to the direct actions of the mob. > > That’s not certain. It is absolutely certain to anyone with more than a scintilla of a clue. > >>>> they didn't directly kill him? > >>> Nope. > >> We disagree, > > Yes, but you have no basis for your claim. > > It remains to be seen what the autopsy finds. And when the autopsy report is published, you'll just claim it was what "some journo" said.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-17 08:37 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6h4ldFi5fcU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73696 |
Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote > Rod Speed wrote >>>> > > > they also caused significant amount of damage >>>> > > >>>> > > Yes. >>>> > > >>>> > > > and so far, directly or indirectly killed six people >>>> > > >>>> > > Nope, not even one. >>>> >>>> > Really? >>>> >>>> Yep. One of the violent invaders got shot, >>> >>> Correct. She was shot because she was one of a mob with violent >>> intentions. >>>> >>>> the others died of medical incidents. >>>> None were killed by the violent invaders. >> >>> Three died of various medical emergencies >>> which might, or might not have occurred at >>> any other time, but are likely to have been >>> provoked by the events of the day. >> >> Yes, bit they were the invaders and so if the >> event killed them, that’s because they chose >> to be part of the group that violently invaded. > And but if the event hadn't take place they would still be alive You don’t know that except with the one that got trampled by the other violent invaders. > so they were killed by it. Wrong, as always. >>> The possibility exists that had they not been >>> part of the mob they would be alive today. >> Yes, but like I said, they chose to take part in >> a violent invasion so if that killed them, it was >> their choice to get involved in a violent invasion. > And your initial answer is still bullshit. Nope. And it wasn’t an answer either. >>> One of the medical incidents was when an ambulance >>> & EMTs were called for the woman found on the floor >>> of the Rotunda. She was one of the mob and she had >>> been crushed, and trampled by her fellow violent invaders. >> Yes, that is a risk with any violent invasion. > And your initial answer is still bullshit. Nope. And it wasn’t an answer either. >> If you don’t like that risk, don’t get involved in violent invasions. > And your initial answer is still bullshit. Nope. And it wasn’t an answer either. >>> So far she is one of two who died due to >>> the direct actions of the “violent invaders”. >> Yes but it was her choice to be involved in a violent invasion. > And your initial answer is still bullshit. Nope. And it wasn’t an answer either. >>>>> The police officer who died from having his head bashed in: >>>> No one had their head bashed in. An extinguisher was >>>> thrown at him and he was fine for hours after that and later >>>> had a medical incident outside the capitol that killed him. >>> He was hit in the head with the fire extinguisher. >> Yes. >>> The injury due to that blow subsequently caused his death. >> That is less clear. He was quite capable of returning to >> his divisional office and had the medical incident there. >> He clearly didn’t seek medical assistance at the capitol >> and so the head injury cant have been severe, let alone >> saw his head bashed in. > You literally have not a scintilla of a clue about head injuries. You in spades. He clearly couldn’t have had his head bashed in, if that had happened, he wouldn’t have been allowed to return to his divisional office, he would have got medical assistance at the capitol and would have been taken to the EMT in an ambulance. >>> Without one or more of the “violent invaders” >>> directly hitting him in the head with the fire >>> extinguisher he would be alive today. >> That isnt certain. Even an autopsy cant necessarily prove >> that, it depends on how severe the head injury was. It cant >> have been too severe if he could return to his divisional >> office and didn’t seek medical assistance before he did. > You literally have not a scintilla of a clue about head injuries. You in spades. He clearly couldn’t have had his head bashed in, if that had happened, he wouldn’t have been allowed to return to his divisional office, he would have got medical assistance at the capitol and would have been taken to the EMT in an ambulance. >>> He is the second to die due to the direct actions of the mob. >> That’s not certain. > It is absolutely certain to anyone with more than a scintilla of a clue. More bullshit from you. >>>>> they didn't directly kill him? >> >>>> Nope. >> >>> We disagree, >> >> Yes, but you have no basis for your claim. >> >> It remains to be seen what the autopsy finds. > > And when the autopsy report is published, you'll just claim it was what > "some journo" said. Nope, you watch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-16 14:01 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rtvnok$820$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73697 |
On 2021-01-16 1:37 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote >> Rod Speed wrote > >>>>> > > > they also caused significant amount of damage >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Yes. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > > and so far, directly or indirectly killed six people >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Nope, not even one. >>>>> >>>>> > Really? >>>>> >>>>> Yep. One of the violent invaders got shot, >>>> >>>> Correct. She was shot because she was one of a mob with violent >>>> intentions. >>>>> >>>>> the others died of medical incidents. >>>>> None were killed by the violent invaders. >>> >>>> Three died of various medical emergencies >>>> which might, or might not have occurred at >>>> any other time, but are likely to have been >>>> provoked by the events of the day. >>> >>> Yes, bit they were the invaders and so if the >>> event killed them, that’s because they chose >>> to be part of the group that violently invaded. > >> And but if the event hadn't take place they would still be alive > > You don’t know that except with the one that > got trampled by the other violent invaders. Any person of even very meagre intelligence n=knows that. > >> so they were killed by it. > > Wrong, as always. Nope. > >>>> The possibility exists that had they not been >>>> part of the mob they would be alive today. > >>> Yes, but like I said, they chose to take part in >>> a violent invasion so if that killed them, it was >>> their choice to get involved in a violent invasion. > >> And your initial answer is still bullshit. > > Nope. And it wasn’t an answer either. It was an answer. Do you really need it quoted back to you? > >>>> One of the medical incidents was when an ambulance >>>> & EMTs were called for the woman found on the floor >>>> of the Rotunda. She was one of the mob and she had >>>> been crushed, and trampled by her fellow violent invaders. > >>> Yes, that is a risk with any violent invasion. > >> And your initial answer is still bullshit. > > Nope. And it wasn’t an answer either. > >>> If you don’t like that risk, don’t get involved in violent invasions. > >> And your initial answer is still bullshit. > > Nope. And it wasn’t an answer either. > >>>> So far she is one of two who died due to >>>> the direct actions of the “violent invaders”. > >>> Yes but it was her choice to be involved in a violent invasion. > >> And your initial answer is still bullshit. > > Nope. And it wasn’t an answer either. > >>>>>> The police officer who died from having his head bashed in: > >>>>> No one had their head bashed in. An extinguisher was >>>>> thrown at him and he was fine for hours after that and later >>>>> had a medical incident outside the capitol that killed him. > >>>> He was hit in the head with the fire extinguisher. > >>> Yes. > >>>> The injury due to that blow subsequently caused his death. > >>> That is less clear. He was quite capable of returning to >>> his divisional office and had the medical incident there. >>> He clearly didn’t seek medical assistance at the capitol >>> and so the head injury cant have been severe, let alone >>> saw his head bashed in. > >> You literally have not a scintilla of a clue about head injuries. > > You in spades. He clearly couldn’t have had his head bashed in, > if that had happened, he wouldn’t have been allowed to return > to his divisional office, he would have got medical assistance > at the capitol and would have been taken to the EMT in an > ambulance. "bashed in" in was HYPERBOLE. He was hit in the head with a fire extinguisher. There are lots of injuries humans can sustain which are fatal, but which don't manifest themselves until later. A sub-dural hematoma is one such injury. > >>>>>> they didn't directly kill him? >>> >>>>> Nope. >>> >>>> We disagree, >>> >>> Yes, but you have no basis for your claim. >>> >>> It remains to be seen what the autopsy finds. >> >> And when the autopsy report is published, you'll just claim it was >> what "some journo" said. > > Nope, you watch. I will. "sub-dural hematoma": look it up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-18 09:59 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ru4iat$hr3$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73688 |
On 1/16/2021 2:49 AM, Savageduck wrote: <snip> > He was hit in the head with the fire extinguisher. The injury due to that blow subsequently caused his death. Without one or more of the “violent invaders” directly hitting him in the head with the fire extinguisher he would be alive today. He is the second to die due to the direct actions of the mob. It's funny-sad to see people insisting that those that died or were killed as a result of the riot really didn't die directly as a result. The bottom line is that all of those people would almost certainly be alive today had the insurrection not occurred. Hopefully those that were caught and arrested will receive appropriate jail and prison terms. I think that Trump's suggestion of ten year prison terms may be excessive for those that were just trespassing and not destroying things, but one to three years would be appropriate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-18 13:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <180120211307192396%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #73740 |
In article <ru4iat$hr3$1@dont-email.me>, sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote: > > The bottom line is that all of those people would almost certainly be > alive today had the insurrection not occurred. Hopefully those that were > caught and arrested will receive appropriate jail and prison terms. I > think that Trump's suggestion of ten year prison terms may be excessive > for those that were just trespassing and not destroying things, but one > to three years would be appropriate. insurrection carries a penalty of up to 10 years, which is nowhere near enough. the penalty for treason, which this was not, is death and more appropriate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | AJL <noemail@none.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-18 12:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ru4na0$ou2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73740 |
On 1/18/2021 10:59 AM, sms wrote: > The bottom line is that all of those people would almost certainly be > alive today had the insurrection not occurred. Plus Covid loves a superspreader event and she likely will have the numerical death count last laugh.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-19 07:43 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6ma7oFiemoU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73745 |
"AJL" <noemail@none.com> wrote in message news:ru4na0$ou2$1@dont-email.me... > On 1/18/2021 10:59 AM, sms wrote: > >> The bottom line is that all of those people would almost certainly be >> alive today had the insurrection not occurred. > > Plus Covid loves a superspreader event Yeah, specially with all that shouting. > and she likely will have the > numerical death count last laugh. Fortunately it will mostly be those fools killed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-16 16:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <i6gk9vFeua4U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73677 |
On 2021-01-16, Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> they did a lot more than 'invade the capitol'. >> >> insurrectionists > > There were no insurrectionists. Fuck off, roofucker. You useless drongos don't know the first thing about what's happening here. Stay stupid in Australia, as always. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-15 07:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rtscp7$a3b$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73650 |
On 1/14/2021 11:02 PM, The Real Bev wrote: <snip> > If this is what insurrection has become we're truly in deep shit. And > speaking of shit, wasn't somebody going to take a dump in Pelosi's chair? As one journalist expounded, "This was not an insurrection, it was a livestreamed social media white fantasy." "These people have been the most heard since they were born—...They have always had a voice, always been catered to, and never been marginalized in any true measure—which is why losing an election now feels like some horrible systemic wrong that is that last straw in a fictional pile of injustices they have had to carry and could no longer. Their violence was not a desperate cry for justice, it was a spoiled toddler’s tantrum with deadly consequences." Snipped from <https://johnpavlovitz.com/2021/01/10/a-nothing-revolution/>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-16 03:22 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <i6dtq2Ftk3sU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #73662 |
"sms" <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in message news:rtscp7$a3b$1@dont-email.me... > On 1/14/2021 11:02 PM, The Real Bev wrote: > > <snip> > >> If this is what insurrection has become we're truly in deep shit. And >> speaking of shit, wasn't somebody going to take a dump in Pelosi's chair? > > As one journalist expounded, "This was not an insurrection, it was a > livestreamed social media white fantasy." > "These people have been the most heard since they were born—...They have > always had a voice, always been catered to, and never been marginalized in > any true measure— That’s bullshit with the Vietnam war alone and plenty of the Trumpets have lost their jobs too. > which is why losing an election now They lost the Obama, Clinton, JFK elections etc too. > feels like some horrible systemic wrong that is that last straw in a > fictional pile of injustices they have had to carry Nothing fictional about Vietnam and job losses. > and could no longer. Their violence was not a desperate cry for justice, And its far from clear how many of them were trumpets and how many of them were antifa. > it was a spoiled toddler’s tantrum That’s not clear either. > with deadly consequences." > Snipped from <https://johnpavlovitz.com/2021/01/10/a-nothing-revolution/> That fool doesn’t have a fucking clue.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-15 11:55 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rtsrv4$ujd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #73664 |
On 1/15/2021 8:22 AM, Rod Speed wrote: <snip> > They lost the Obama, Clinton, JFK elections etc too. In none of those cases did the person that was elected defeat an incumbent, or an opponent, that the extremists were especially fond of. They were never enamored with George H.W. Bush, McCain, or Romney so when a Democrat, even a black Democrat, defeated the Republican candidate there was not the level of despondency that you see now.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 19 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 17 18 [19] 20 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.android
csiph-web