Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #21118 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-22 10:06 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-07-23 08:39 +1000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 353 — 49 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.android
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-22 10:06 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 10:23 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 08:56 +1000
anonymous sims in EU (was: Who pays for a phone..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-07-23 20:21 +0200
Re: anonymous sims in EU tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-03 20:04 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 03:22 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 10:27 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-22 17:00 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 13:26 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 10:00 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 14:22 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-07-22 10:07 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-22 20:06 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? DevilsPGD <boogabooga@crazyhat.net> - 2015-07-22 13:13 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 09:08 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Chris Blunt <mail@nospam.com> - 2015-07-24 11:22 +0800
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 14:36 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 13:12 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-25 19:34 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 16:58 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 17:51 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 09:57 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-24 14:32 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Wolfgang Barth <barthwo@spamfence.net> - 2015-07-24 15:38 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-07-24 09:26 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 13:22 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-07-25 11:19 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 13:17 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-07-25 11:18 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-25 19:47 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-27 09:46 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 03:50 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 06:59 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-04 16:21 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 08:52 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 05:30 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-04 19:33 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-06 09:39 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 12:17 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 05:41 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-04 17:25 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 05:26 +1000
voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-05 20:08 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-05 14:58 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-05 15:16 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 12:41 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-05 16:03 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 06:24 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 13:34 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 04:51 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-10-21 19:45 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 09:17 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-10-24 17:49 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 13:40 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "NotMe" <me@privacy.net> - 2015-10-24 19:03 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-25 09:52 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 22:28 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Walter Briscoe <wbriscoe@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2015-10-25 08:17 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 10:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-10-25 18:50 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-25 18:00 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 10:16 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-26 07:24 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 10:13 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-27 07:09 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 20:03 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-27 18:33 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "NotMe" <me@privacy.net> - 2015-10-26 08:07 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-10-25 14:58 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "NotMe" <me@privacy.net> - 2015-10-25 17:10 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-10-26 10:08 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 10:09 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-26 07:27 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 10:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-27 07:11 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 20:09 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Walter Briscoe <wbriscoe@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2015-10-26 21:24 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 23:18 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 13:22 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 13:41 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 14:53 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-06 15:35 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 23:26 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-06 16:35 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 09:46 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 14:40 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-07 06:02 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-08 01:09 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 14:04 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas DevilsPGD <boogabooga@crazyhat.net> - 2015-08-09 00:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-08-09 12:42 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2015-08-10 00:18 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-08-09 17:50 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-09 23:19 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-09 23:10 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 08:43 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 13:40 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-11 00:21 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 06:57 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-11 09:57 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:20 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-12 11:21 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-12 19:50 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-12 16:21 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-13 12:08 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-13 09:58 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-13 17:04 +0200
security concept "rule of least priviledge" (was: voting booths in repu areas) Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-17 16:42 -0400
Re: security concept "rule of least priviledge" (was: voting booths in repu areas) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-18 10:08 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 06:26 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-13 09:38 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-13 17:14 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-13 11:42 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-13 18:47 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-13 14:22 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 07:00 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-14 11:34 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 06:53 +0700
what's entrapment (was: voting booths in republican areas) Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-15 14:13 +0000
Re: what's entrapment (was: voting booths in republican areas) John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:20 +0700
Re: what's entrapment Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-18 22:06 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 06:43 +0700
prosecutors do not care about guilt (was: voting booths in republican areas) Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-15 13:42 +0000
Re: prosecutors do not care about guilt (was: voting booths in republican areas) John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:08 +0700
Re: prosecutors do not care about guilt (was: voting booths in republican areas) Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-16 17:14 +0200
Re: prosecutors do not care about guilt Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-17 22:57 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-12 13:07 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-08-12 18:31 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-12 22:44 -0400
why disclose personal info (was: voting booths in republican areas) Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-15 13:20 +0000
Re: why disclose personal info David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-08-15 15:12 +0100
Re: why disclose personal info Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-08-15 15:08 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:26 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:23 -0700
accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-15 09:50 -0400
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) lew <citrustwosac@google.mailer.company.invalid> - 2015-08-15 16:36 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 10:55 -0700
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-15 14:44 -0500
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 19:34 -0700
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:54 +0700
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-18 11:02 +1000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-22 12:55 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-22 19:08 +0200
security vs. manners (was: accommodating unreasonable searches..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-24 00:48 +0200
Re: security vs. manners Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-24 14:18 -0400
Re: security vs. manners The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:59 -0700
Re: security vs. manners Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-25 13:40 +0200
Re: security vs. manners Travis Bickle <3S96@taxi.net> - 2015-08-25 12:31 -0400
Re: security vs. manners lew <citrustwosac@google.mailer.company.invalid> - 2015-08-25 16:38 +0000
Re: security vs. manners "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-26 09:29 -0400
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 10:19 -0400
Re: security vs. manners "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-26 11:45 -0400
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 13:53 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-26 14:39 -0500
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 16:56 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-26 16:08 -0500
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:33 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-26 17:32 -0500
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 19:51 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-26 18:59 -0500
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-27 08:42 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-27 09:24 -0500
Re: security vs. manners tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-26 22:52 -0400
Re: security vs. manners The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 09:57 -0700
Re: security vs. manners Bob Henson <rh547477@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 15:36 +0100
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-25 21:04 -0400
Re: security vs. manners tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-26 03:25 -0400
Re: security vs. manners "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-26 09:26 -0400
Re: security vs. manners The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 12:18 -0700
Re: security vs. manners (was: accommodating unreasonable searches..) TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-25 08:36 -0400
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) noydb@no.way (Bruce Sinclair) - 2015-08-16 23:19 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) "Stuart McCall" <smccall@myunrealbox.com> - 2015-08-17 18:08 +0100
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-17 17:22 -0400
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) noydb@no.way (Bruce Sinclair) - 2015-08-17 23:15 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) "Stuart McCall" <smccall@myunrealbox.com> - 2015-08-18 17:11 +0100
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) noydb@no.way (Bruce Sinclair) - 2015-08-18 23:03 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) Joe Makowiec <makowiec@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-19 13:53 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 06:49 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-06 17:25 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 19:51 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 19:31 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 21:56 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-06 20:51 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-06 21:48 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 19:29 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-07 15:40 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-07 00:08 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-07 21:08 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-08 01:04 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 13:58 +1000
do absentee voters need photo id? (was: voting booths in republican areas) Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-08 14:03 +0200
Re: do absentee voters need photo id? (was: voting booths in republican areas) Elias <elias@nowherenohow.com> - 2015-08-08 10:02 -0500
Re: do absentee voters need photo id? (was: voting booths in republican areas) Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-08 21:28 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-06 15:23 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas News <News@Group.Post> - 2015-08-06 07:00 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 04:59 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:33 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-06 15:34 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 18:50 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 16:55 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 09:12 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 08:40 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-06 07:26 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 12:16 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 13:24 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 12:16 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 13:22 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-06 07:35 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-08-06 14:36 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 12:18 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 13:31 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:46 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 14:04 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 12:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 14:27 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:44 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 13:58 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 12:12 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:36 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-10 20:05 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 06:18 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-05 15:27 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 13:38 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 15:25 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-05 15:19 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 09:07 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 08:38 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-06 07:25 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 11:11 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-06 07:31 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 12:02 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 11:14 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:38 -0700
leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-07 14:58 +0200
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-07 10:56 -0400
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 05:16 +1000
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-25 22:45 +0200
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-26 09:24 -0400
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-27 13:47 +0000
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-27 10:20 -0400
q) campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? a) education Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-09-03 08:44 +0000
comp.mobile.android "The Sorceress of Qar" <sorceress@qar.qanar.com> - 2015-08-27 09:23 -0500
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-27 13:01 -0400
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201509.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-09-06 00:12 +0200
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-08 16:21 -0700
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-22 23:11 +0200
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 20:54 -0700
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-08-22 23:40 -0500
Bev's reverse logic (was: leader's campaigns..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-09-03 09:22 +0200
Re: Bev's reverse logic David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-09-03 08:44 +0100
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-23 08:49 -0400
small campaign donations (was: leader's campaigns..) Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-31 16:06 -0400
leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-12 04:08 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Aldo Raine <apache@scalpem.net> - 2015-08-05 18:13 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 16:02 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Mike Yetto <unet.lighthouse@xoxy.net> - 2015-08-06 18:27 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Aldo Raine <apache@scalpem.net> - 2015-08-07 12:36 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-07 12:38 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-10 08:51 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-10 22:28 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-11 08:53 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-11 01:06 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-11 10:25 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-11 17:46 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-12 09:54 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-05 19:00 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas Aldo Raine <apache@scalpem.net> - 2015-08-07 12:39 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-08-06 16:14 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 09:07 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-18 09:49 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 11:46 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-18 12:38 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 18:51 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-19 11:14 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 08:31 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-19 12:56 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 11:57 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-19 15:04 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 12:22 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-19 15:36 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 06:09 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 13:10 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:03 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-19 12:39 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Joe Makowiec <makowiec@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-19 20:09 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-19 14:27 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 14:58 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-19 16:10 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-20 08:32 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:14 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-24 08:33 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-24 09:37 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 15:27 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:13 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-19 16:34 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-19 14:46 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-20 12:40 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-20 09:55 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-20 10:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-20 22:35 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:09 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:02 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-19 00:03 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 19:01 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2015-08-19 19:08 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 09:34 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-18 23:57 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 19:05 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 09:28 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2015-08-19 19:14 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-19 09:09 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 07:15 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 05:56 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 05:52 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 13:15 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas David Solimano <david@solimano.org> - 2015-08-06 22:52 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 21:59 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 20:26 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 14:03 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 13:11 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 05:34 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-25 20:04 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Dieghettino <d@casa.mia> - 2015-07-26 06:41 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 08:45 +1000
non-EU travellers must carry passports (was: Who pays..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-01 20:26 +0200
Re: non-EU travellers must carry passports cl@isbd.net - 2015-08-01 21:33 +0100
Re: non-EU travellers must carry passports tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-03 23:11 -0400
Re: non-EU travellers must carry passports cl@isbd.net - 2015-08-04 14:25 +0100
Re: non-EU travellers must carry passports Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-05 18:56 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 04:05 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 07:03 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 14:11 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-04 11:19 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 12:19 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 12:32 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-04 15:40 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 14:15 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 05:36 +1000
id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-05 20:05 +0000
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 13:19 -0700
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 04:46 -0400
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 09:10 -0400
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 14:51 -0400
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 14:58 -0400
id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-08 08:48 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-26 18:45 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 10:04 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-27 09:51 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-28 09:30 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 20:24 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-25 19:57 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 16:57 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 08:39 +1000
Page 10 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 18 Next page →
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 19:31 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mq156j$d1i$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21790 |
On 08/06/2015 05:51 PM, BobbyK wrote: > On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 17:25:20 -0700, Leonard Blaisdell > <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >>In article <d2ga0jFd6hdU1@mid.individual.net>, JHY <JHY5566@nospam.com> >>wrote: >> >>> Yes, but again, that wouldn¹t affect the result of the election, >>> so few bother to do that. >> >>In the 2008 Minnesota election, Coleman (R) lost to Franken (D) by 312 >>votes out of 2.9 million cast. Had Coleman won, we would not have >>Obamacare. > > Wrong. Much more detailed information here. > > http://www.startribune.com/did-al-franken-really-cast-the-60th-vote-for-obamacare/238733121/ > > >>So yeah, a tiny smattering of fraud votes can matter >>immensely. Oh, and Minnesota is a dark blue state which makes me less >>confident in the final decision of who did win. > > So you are saying that there was fraud in the Minnesota voting? I doubt if we could know by now, but if there were, and if it put Franken in office, it could have been with only a small number of fraudulent votes. "Oh, it's only a FEW bits of fraud, it doesn't really matter..." Yeah, it does. -- Cheers, Bev =========================================== Election 2008: There's never been a better time to vote libertarian.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 21:56 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <p378sahif14l4r1tjpc25e3dl88fikdsvo@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #21792 |
On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 19:31:16 -0700, The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >On 08/06/2015 05:51 PM, BobbyK wrote: >> On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 17:25:20 -0700, Leonard Blaisdell >> <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> >>>In article <d2ga0jFd6hdU1@mid.individual.net>, JHY <JHY5566@nospam.com> >>>wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, but again, that wouldn¹t affect the result of the election, >>>> so few bother to do that. >>> >>>In the 2008 Minnesota election, Coleman (R) lost to Franken (D) by 312 >>>votes out of 2.9 million cast. Had Coleman won, we would not have >>>Obamacare. >> >> Wrong. Much more detailed information here. >> >> http://www.startribune.com/did-al-franken-really-cast-the-60th-vote-for-obamacare/238733121/ >> >> >>>So yeah, a tiny smattering of fraud votes can matter >>>immensely. Oh, and Minnesota is a dark blue state which makes me less >>>confident in the final decision of who did win. >> >> So you are saying that there was fraud in the Minnesota voting? > >I doubt if we could know by now, but if there were, and if it put >Franken in office, it could have been with only a small number of >fraudulent votes. "Oh, it's only a FEW bits of fraud, it doesn't really >matter..." Yeah, it does. "If, "could have been", yada, yada, yada. More innuendo and supposition. There was absolutely no indication, nor accusation of fraud. Drop the ifs, it happened and obviously was fair since there was no arrests. Just like the Florida vote it just had to be counted and recounted. Face it, he won.... and did you notice that Franken won re-election six years later? Hmmm. The favorite with voters twice.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 20:51 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <060820152051283557%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #21792 |
In article <mq156j$d1i$2@dont-email.me>, The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: > On 08/06/2015 05:51 PM, BobbyK wrote: > > On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 17:25:20 -0700, Leonard Blaisdell > > <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > >>In article <d2ga0jFd6hdU1@mid.individual.net>, JHY <JHY5566@nospam.com> > >>wrote: > >> > >>> Yes, but again, that wouldn1t affect the result of the election, > >>> so few bother to do that. > >> > >>In the 2008 Minnesota election, Coleman (R) lost to Franken (D) by 312 > >>votes out of 2.9 million cast. Had Coleman won, we would not have > >>Obamacare. > > > > Wrong. Much more detailed information here. > > > > > > http://www.startribune.com/did-al-franken-really-cast-the-60th-vote-for-obam > > acare/238733121/ > > > > > >>So yeah, a tiny smattering of fraud votes can matter > >>immensely. Oh, and Minnesota is a dark blue state which makes me less > >>confident in the final decision of who did win. > > > > So you are saying that there was fraud in the Minnesota voting? > > I doubt if we could know by now, but if there were, and if it put > Franken in office, it could have been with only a small number of > fraudulent votes. "Oh, it's only a FEW bits of fraud, it doesn't really > matter..." Yeah, it does. If there had been any fraudulent votes, Franken would probably have won by a bigger margin.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 21:48 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <060820152148361656%leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> |
| In reply to | #21790 |
In article <h308sa176g2h1v8ff7ups9l8vtde3jpmpo@4ax.com>, BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> wrote: > Wrong. Much more detailed information here. > http://www.startribune.com/did-al-franken-really-cast-the-60th-vote-for-obamac > are/238733121/ Seriously? That's your justification. How about this nonunion everyman shop. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norm_Coleman> > So you are saying that there was fraud in the Minnesota voting? Of course I am, oh wait! Probably. If Coleman had won, there would not be Obamacare or at least not as the sad mandate that it has become. leo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 19:29 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mq152n$d1i$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21789 |
On 08/06/2015 05:25 PM, Leonard Blaisdell wrote: > In article <d2ga0jFd6hdU1@mid.individual.net>, JHY <JHY5566@nospam.com> > wrote: > >> Yes, but again, that wouldn¹t affect the result of the election, >> so few bother to do that. > > In the 2008 Minnesota election, Coleman (R) lost to Franken (D) by 312 > votes out of 2.9 million cast. Had Coleman won, we would not have > Obamacare. So yeah, a tiny smattering of fraud votes can matter > immensely. Oh, and Minnesota is a dark blue state which makes me less > confident in the final decision of who did win. If only Franken's career in comedy had burgeoned. Oh, wait... -- Cheers, Bev ===================================================== Election 2008: There's never been a better time to vote libertarian.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 15:40 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <d2iv2qF2tt0U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #21789 |
"Leonard Blaisdell" <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:060820151725205307%leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net... > In article <d2ga0jFd6hdU1@mid.individual.net>, JHY <JHY5566@nospam.com> > wrote: > >> Yes, but again, that wouldn¹t affect the result of the election, >> so few bother to do that. > > In the 2008 Minnesota election, Coleman (R) lost to Franken (D) by 312 > votes out of 2.9 million cast. Had Coleman won, we would not have > Obamacare. So yeah, a tiny smattering of fraud votes can matter immensely. Sure, but it isn't possible to work out in advance that a particular result is going to be that close and organise 156 people who know someone who has moved away and won't be voting so you can claim to be them and vote instead of them. And even if that was possible, the other major's goons could do that too so it wouldn't change the result unless they did it much more badly than your lot did and did it with a lot more than 156 people. > Oh, and Minnesota is a dark blue state which makes > me less confident in the final decision of who did win.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 00:08 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <070820150008516477%leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> |
| In reply to | #21799 |
In article <d2iv2qF2tt0U1@mid.individual.net>, JHY <JHY5566@nospam.com> wrote: > Sure, but it isn't possible to work out in advance that a particular > result is going to be that close and organise 156 people who > know someone who has moved away and won't be voting so > you can claim to be them and vote instead of them. And even > if that was possible, the other major's goons could do that too > so it wouldn't change the result unless they did it much more > badly than your lot did and did it with a lot more than 156 people. I'm not interested in one possibility. I'm interested in "all" possibilities. In a edge of the razor-blade thin election in a red state, I'd be deeply suspicious if a Republican won. As it was, Franken won and Obamacare became the law of the land. Anyone who tells you different including those posting with liberal cites in here are full of it. leo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 21:08 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <d2jhtlF7e6tU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #21801 |
"Leonard Blaisdell" <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:070820150008516477%leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net... > In article <d2iv2qF2tt0U1@mid.individual.net>, JHY <JHY5566@nospam.com> > wrote: > >> Sure, but it isn't possible to work out in advance that a particular >> result is going to be that close and organise 156 people who >> know someone who has moved away and won't be voting so >> you can claim to be them and vote instead of them. And even >> if that was possible, the other major's goons could do that too >> so it wouldn't change the result unless they did it much more >> badly than your lot did and did it with a lot more than 156 people. > I'm not interested in one possibility. I'm interested in "all" > possibilities. But its only the close results where there would be any point in attempting vote fraud, so they wont be doing vote fraud just in case it turns out to be a close result, because its impossible to get enough fraudulent votes to matter. > In a edge of the razor-blade thin election in a red > state, I'd be deeply suspicious if a Republican won. More fool you. > As it was, Franken won and Obamacare became the law of the land. But there isn't a shred of evidence that any voter fraud was responsible for that. Anyone who tells you > different including those posting with liberal cites in here are full > of it. What a stunning line in rational argument you have there.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 01:04 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <55C53985.6C462B6@B.Maus.De> |
| In reply to | #21710 |
The Real Bev wrote: > I could have voted for any of the ones who moved away or died > whenever I wanted. Not just those. Half of eligible voters don't bother and you probably know your neighbours. Not even that is necessary, you just need to make sure you come first. On the downside, your neighbours are NOT a good choice. Some attendent might recognize you if you come several times, spread it over several polling stations and you're safe. I'll probably do that one day (and not vote under my own name) and then identify myself just to show the system up, not asking for ID is criminal neglect IMHO. Axel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 13:58 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <d2ld2eFlgg0U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #21827 |
Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> wrote > The Real Bev wrote >> I could have voted for any of the ones who >> moved away or died whenever I wanted. > Not just those. Half of eligible voters don't bother and > you probably know your neighbours. Not even that is > necessary, you just need to make sure you come first. But fraudulently voting that way has a very high risk that the real voter will show up and find that someone has already voted claiming to be them and so it will be clear that a lot of fraudulent voting is going on. > On the downside, your neighbours are NOT a good choice. > Some attendent might recognize you if you come several > times, spread it over several polling stations and you're safe. Not if you vote before someone who does try to vote, someone may well remember who first claimed to be that voter, particularly if you do much of it and you would have to do that to make any useful difference to the result. > I'll probably do that one day (and not vote under my > own name) and then identify myself just to show the > system up, not asking for ID is criminal neglect IMHO. Not in mine, particularly with those who find it hard to have photo ID. Most jurisdictions don't have the european police state system that requires them to always have ID.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 14:03 +0200 |
| Subject | do absentee voters need photo id? (was: voting booths in republican areas) |
| Message-ID | <a50a1973fc59b3c6e79a7cf9057c71fb@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> |
| In reply to | #21827 |
> Not just those. Half of eligible voters don't bother and you > probably know your neighbours. Actually in congested large cities, you probably don't know your neighbors. And in rural/suburban parts you probably don't know enough neighbors to make a difference, as these parts are higher in (die-hard) conservative voters. It would be an absurd amount of effort and risk to exploit an insignificant vote. > Not even that is necessary, you just need to make sure you come > first. On the downside, your neighbours are NOT a good choice. Some > attendent might recognize you if you come several times, spread it > over several polling stations and you're safe. Impossible in the US. US voters cannot choose their polling station; it's assigned based on address. Which is unfortunate, because another republican tactic involves providing a disproportionately small number of booths in regions where the progressive turnout is high, forcing a 2+ hour queue wait. The inconvenience ultimately drives off (progressive) voters. > not asking for ID is criminal neglect IMHO. Including absentee voters? Should in-person voters be subjected to a higher standard of id proof than absentee voters?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Elias <elias@nowherenohow.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 10:02 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: do absentee voters need photo id? (was: voting booths in republican areas) |
| Message-ID | <f06csatt0p2jjk33n28habre4bkoipfh6a@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #21834 |
On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 14:03:16 +0200, Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote: >> Not just those. Half of eligible voters don't bother and you >> probably know your neighbours. > >Actually in congested large cities, you probably don't know your >neighbors. > >And in rural/suburban parts you probably don't know enough neighbors >to make a difference, as these parts are higher in (die-hard) >conservative voters. It would be an absurd amount of effort and risk >to exploit an insignificant vote. > >> Not even that is necessary, you just need to make sure you come >> first. On the downside, your neighbours are NOT a good choice. Some >> attendent might recognize you if you come several times, spread it >> over several polling stations and you're safe. > >Impossible in the US. US voters cannot choose their polling station; >it's assigned based on address. Not strictly true. I can't speak for other states, but in Texas, for early voting, you can go to any voting location. http://www.votetexas.gov/voting/when/#early-voting Under Texas law you do have to provide a picture ID, but that requirement is was voided just the other day by the Court of Appeals. Stay tuned for more litigation. For more, see http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/07/opinion/the-real-voter-fraud-is-texas-id-law.html?_r=0 >Which is unfortunate, because another republican tactic involves >providing a disproportionately small number of booths in regions where >the progressive turnout is high, forcing a 2+ hour queue wait. The >inconvenience ultimately drives off (progressive) voters. > >> not asking for ID is criminal neglect IMHO. > >Including absentee voters? > >Should in-person voters be subjected to a higher standard of id proof >than absentee voters?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 21:28 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: do absentee voters need photo id? (was: voting booths in republican areas) |
| Message-ID | <55C65849.17CF0AF0@B.Maus.De> |
| In reply to | #21834 |
Fritz Wuehler wrote: > US voters cannot choose their polling station; > it's assigned based on address. Same here. That's what I meant: Impersonate people with different addresses. Also reduces the risk of an attendent knowing and recognizing you. But I also accept the other agument stated here, that it is probabaly a lot of effort and risk if you do it on a scale large enough to make a difference. Axel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 15:23 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <d2g9b2Fd1pjU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #21704 |
"The Real Bev" <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote in message news:mptr75$47q$1@dont-email.me... > On 08/05/2015 12:41 PM, Michelle Steiner wrote: >> In article <mptma8$feh$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Democrats don't support voter ID for one simple reason - they have no >>> interest in prohibiting voter fraud because they benefit from it. >> >> Bullshit! Study after study shows that voter ID fraud is virtually >> nonexistent. > > Would you care to explain just how that might work? Very easily, by asking those who register voters how often they have ever had anyone say that someone else has voted claiming to be them, or where someone who is dead has voted. I'm serious about > this. I've heard that before, but how can there be voter fraud if there's > no way to determine which voters are legitimate? There is actually by checking whether those who have voted have social security numbers after the election. Sure, a few well have fraudulently obtained social security numbers, but that is a quite minor issue. >> Republicans want strict voter ID laws because the poor >> and minorities are less likely to have photo ID, and the poor and >> minorities are more likely to vote Democratic. > > No, we don't want the illegals to vote. Plenty of politicians do if the illegal will vote for them. Why is this so hard to > understand? BTW, I used to be a Republican until they stopped being > republicans; now I'm a Libertarian, sort of. > >>> This notion that requiring voter ID is a political strategy and >>> that the purpose is to scare off voters is pure bunk. >> >> It is a political strategy designed to reduce the number of poor and >> minority voters. It is a "cure" for a virtually nonexistent problem. > > If LEGAL poor and minority voters can't figure out how to acquire the > proper documentation (which you have to do for just about every damn thing > anyway) No you don’t if you don’t want any govt services and a social security number is no use to vote with and that is all some have. > maybe they've in effect forfeited their right to vote. Not everything is > easy or automatic, nor should it be. If you care enough about something > you'll figure out a way to do it. But the point is that the sort of voter who doesn’t bother to vote but is driven to the polling booth and home again by the party that wants them to vote who doesn’t have a photo ID because it is no used to them won't be bothering.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | News <News@Group.Post> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 07:00 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mpvelb$6b2$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21714 |
On 8/6/2015 1:23 AM, JHY wrote: > > > "The Real Bev" <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:mptr75$47q$1@dont-email.me... >> On 08/05/2015 12:41 PM, Michelle Steiner wrote: >>> In article <mptma8$feh$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Democrats don't support voter ID for one simple reason - they have no >>>> interest in prohibiting voter fraud because they benefit from it. >>> >>> Bullshit! Study after study shows that voter ID fraud is virtually >>> nonexistent. >> >> Would you care to explain just how that might work? > > Very easily, by asking those who register voters how often > they have ever had anyone say that someone else has voted > claiming to be them, or where someone who is dead has voted. > > I'm serious about >> this. I've heard that before, but how can there be voter fraud if >> there's no way to determine which voters are legitimate? > > There is actually by checking whether those who have > voted have social security numbers after the election. > Sure, a few well have fraudulently obtained social > security numbers, but that is a quite minor issue. > >>> Republicans want strict voter ID laws because the poor >>> and minorities are less likely to have photo ID, and the poor and >>> minorities are more likely to vote Democratic. >> >> No, we don't want the illegals to vote. > > Plenty of politicians do if the illegal will vote for them. > > Why is this so hard to >> understand? BTW, I used to be a Republican until they stopped being >> republicans; now I'm a Libertarian, sort of. >> >>>> This notion that requiring voter ID is a political strategy and >>>> that the purpose is to scare off voters is pure bunk. >>> >>> It is a political strategy designed to reduce the number of poor and >>> minority voters. It is a "cure" for a virtually nonexistent problem. >> >> If LEGAL poor and minority voters can't figure out how to acquire the >> proper documentation (which you have to do for just about every damn >> thing anyway) > > No you don’t if you don’t want any govt services > and a social security number is no use to vote with > and that is all some have. > >> maybe they've in effect forfeited their right to vote. Not everything >> is easy or automatic, nor should it be. If you care enough about >> something you'll figure out a way to do it. > > But the point is that the sort of voter who doesn’t bother > to vote but is driven to the polling booth and home again > by the party that wants them to vote who doesn’t have a > photo ID because it is no used to them won't be bothering. Easy. Make the IDs and voting booths out of transparent aluminum.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 04:59 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mpjt18li63h5.87eopowxtv05.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #21704 |
On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:22:28 -0700, The Real Bev wrote: > If you care > enough about something you'll figure out a way to do it. That's an interesting redefinition of what it means to "care enough" :-) . But for the semiliterate homeless ex-con, it's hopelessly wrong. Such a person won't be offered a full-time job *ever*, however much (s)he cares. -- Avant de repondre, jeter la poubelle, SVP.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 11:33 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mq097h$fh9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21729 |
On 08/06/2015 01:59 AM, tlvp wrote: > On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:22:28 -0700, The Real Bev wrote: > >> If you care >> enough about something you'll figure out a way to do it. > > That's an interesting redefinition of what it means to "care enough" :-) . > But for the semiliterate homeless ex-con, it's hopelessly wrong. Such a > person won't be offered a full-time job *ever*, however much (s)he cares. Why would this person care about voting? If he went to the nearest library and asked the librarian if she knew of someone who could teach him to read, I bet she'd find someone. Ex-cons generally can't vote anyway. Shit happens, and not all of it can be fixed. -- Cheers, Bev $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Polish loan sharks: they loan you money and then skip town.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 15:34 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <2015080615340816395-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| In reply to | #21763 |
On 2015-08-06 18:33:52 +0000, The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> said: > On 08/06/2015 01:59 AM, tlvp wrote: >> On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:22:28 -0700, The Real Bev wrote: >> >>> If you care >>> enough about something you'll figure out a way to do it. >> >> That's an interesting redefinition of what it means to "care enough" :-) . >> But for the semiliterate homeless ex-con, it's hopelessly wrong. Such a >> person won't be offered a full-time job *ever*, however much (s)he cares. > > Why would this person care about voting? If he went to the nearest > library and asked the librarian if she knew of someone who could teach > him to read, I bet she'd find someone. Ex-cons generally can't vote > anyway. > > Shit happens, and not all of it can be fixed. I guess you missed this: <http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_28586056/voting-rights-be-restored-tens-thousands-felons-california> -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 18:50 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <0ls7sat4q9oif38bkp0r82beefcn0jb325@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #21783 |
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 15:34:08 -0700, Savageduck
<savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>On 2015-08-06 18:33:52 +0000, The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> said:
>
>> On 08/06/2015 01:59 AM, tlvp wrote:
>>> On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:22:28 -0700, The Real Bev wrote:
>>>
>>>> If you care
>>>> enough about something you'll figure out a way to do it.
>>>
>>> That's an interesting redefinition of what it means to "care enough" :-) .
>>> But for the semiliterate homeless ex-con, it's hopelessly wrong. Such a
>>> person won't be offered a full-time job *ever*, however much (s)he cares.
>>
>> Why would this person care about voting? If he went to the nearest
>> library and asked the librarian if she knew of someone who could teach
>> him to read, I bet she'd find someone. Ex-cons generally can't vote
>> anyway.
>>
>> Shit happens, and not all of it can be fixed.
>
>I guess you missed this:
><http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_28586056/voting-rights-be-restored-tens-thousands-felons-california>
Shocking!!! Until you read it carefully. Then it makes sense.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 16:55 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mq0s32$m0h$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21783 |
On 08/06/2015 03:34 PM, Savageduck wrote: > On 2015-08-06 18:33:52 +0000, The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> said: > >> On 08/06/2015 01:59 AM, tlvp wrote: >>> On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:22:28 -0700, The Real Bev wrote: >>> >>>> If you care >>>> enough about something you'll figure out a way to do it. >>> >>> That's an interesting redefinition of what it means to "care enough" :-) . >>> But for the semiliterate homeless ex-con, it's hopelessly wrong. Such a >>> person won't be offered a full-time job *ever*, however much (s)he cares. >> >> Why would this person care about voting? If he went to the nearest >> library and asked the librarian if she knew of someone who could teach >> him to read, I bet she'd find someone. Ex-cons generally can't vote >> anyway. >> >> Shit happens, and not all of it can be fixed. > > I guess you missed this: > <http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_28586056/voting-rights-be-restored-tens-thousands-felons-california> Indeed. I heard about that. Even before that I know that in some places the former felon can petition the court and possibly get his voting rights restored. That also would -- presumably -- make them eligible for jury service. The one former felon I know regards the jury service prohibition as a positive boon. -- Cheers, Bev = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 'Politics' comes from an ancient Greek word meaning 'many blood-sucking leeches.' -- Mark Russell
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 18 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.android
csiph-web