Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #155420 > unrolled thread
| Started by | micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-08-31 09:01 -0400 |
| Last post | 2026-09-09 12:53 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 173 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.android
How does whatsapp work? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-08-31 09:01 -0400
Re: How does whatsapp work? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-31 09:20 -0600
Re: How does whatsapp work? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-09-01 00:51 -0400
Re: How does whatsapp work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-31 20:37 +0200
Re: How does whatsapp work? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-09-01 01:01 -0400
Re: How does whatsapp work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-01 09:44 +0200
Re: How does whatsapp work? "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-09-01 12:47 +0200
Signal (was: Re: How does whatsapp work?) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 12:21 +0100
Re: Signal (was: Re: How does whatsapp work?) "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-09-01 16:30 +0200
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-01 19:15 +0200
Re: Signal "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-01 19:32 +0200
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-01 21:25 +0200
Re: Signal "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-01 21:26 +0200
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-01 21:53 +0200
Re: Signal "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 11:20 +0200
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-02 17:10 +0200
Re: Signal "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 20:37 +0200
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-02 21:23 +0200
Re: Signal "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 21:36 +0200
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-02 22:31 +0200
Re: Signal "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 22:32 +0200
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-03 02:40 +0530
Re: Signal "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 23:24 +0200
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-03 11:39 +0845
[OT/Meta] Trolling (was: Re: Signal) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-03 11:37 +0100
Re: [OT/Meta] Trolling Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-04 03:43 +0930
Re: Signal Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-03 11:28 +0100
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-04 02:31 +0930
[OT] "trolling" (was: Re: Signal) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-02 11:18 +0100
Re: [OT] "trolling" Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-02 17:10 +0200
Re: [OT] "trolling" "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 20:25 +0200
Re: [OT] "trolling" Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-02 22:28 +0200
Re: [OT] "trolling" "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 22:33 +0200
Re: [OT] "trolling" Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-03 02:41 +0530
Re: [OT] "trolling" "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 23:25 +0200
Re: [OT] "trolling" Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-03 11:35 +0845
Re: [OT] "trolling" Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-09-09 20:07 +0000
Re: [OT] "trolling" "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-10 09:27 +0200
Re: [OT] "trolling" "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 20:24 +0200
Re: [OT] "trolling" Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-09-02 18:56 +0000
Re: [OT] "trolling" Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-02 21:18 +0200
Re: [OT] "trolling" "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 21:38 +0200
Re: [OT] "trolling" Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-02 22:27 +0200
Re: [OT] "trolling" "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 22:33 +0200
Re: [OT] "trolling" Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-03 05:58 +0845
Re: [OT] "trolling" "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 23:25 +0200
Re: [OT] "trolling" Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-03 11:36 +0845
Re: Signal Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-01 18:59 +0100
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-01 21:18 +0200
Re: Signal Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-02 11:11 +0100
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-02 17:18 +0200
Re: Signal "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 20:28 +0200
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-02 21:25 +0200
Re: Signal "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 21:38 +0200
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-02 22:32 +0200
Re: Signal "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 23:00 +0200
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-03 02:39 +0530
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-01 19:05 +0200
Re: Signal "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-01 19:13 +0200
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-01 20:52 +0200
Re: Signal "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-01 21:27 +0200
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-01 21:50 +0200
Re: Signal "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 11:20 +0200
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-02 17:11 +0200
Re: Signal Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-02 18:50 +0100
Re: Signal "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 20:30 +0200
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-02 21:34 +0200
Re: Signal "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 21:51 +0200
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-02 22:34 +0200
Re: Signal "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 23:00 +0200
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-03 06:00 +0845
Re: Signal Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-03 09:42 +0100
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-04 03:13 +0930
[OT] "trolling" (was: Re: Signal) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-04 13:12 +0100
Re: [OT] "trolling" (was: Re: Signal) micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-09-08 21:04 +0300
Re: [OT] "trolling" (was: Re: Signal) Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-09-08 19:32 +0000
Re: [OT] "trolling" (was: Re: Signal) micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-09-09 08:21 +0300
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-02 21:31 +0200
Re: Signal "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 21:51 +0200
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-02 22:27 +0200
Re: Signal "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 22:34 +0200
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-03 02:37 +0530
Re: Signal Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-03 11:55 +0100
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-04 02:44 +0930
[OT] "trolling" (was: Re: Signal) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-04 12:39 +0100
Re: Signal micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-09-09 08:44 +0300
Re: Signal "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-04 09:56 +0200
[OT] "trolling" (was: Re: Signal) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-06 10:17 +0100
Re: [OT] "trolling" "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-06 13:59 +0200
Re: [OT] "trolling" Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-06 13:34 +0100
Re: [OT] "trolling" "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-06 20:07 +0200
Re: [OT] "trolling" micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-09-09 08:51 +0300
Re: [OT] "trolling" "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-09 12:49 +0200
Contacts AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-09-09 09:55 -0700
Re: Contacts Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-10 10:16 +0100
Re: Contacts Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-10 09:30 -0700
Re: Contacts AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-09-10 17:49 +0000
Re: Contacts Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-10 21:33 -0700
Re: Contacts AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-09-11 06:54 +0000
Re: Contacts Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-11 01:24 -0600
Re: Contacts AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-09-11 11:09 -0700
Re: Contacts Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-09-11 18:23 +0000
Re: Contacts Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-11 12:56 -0600
Re: Contacts Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-09-11 19:37 +0000
Re: Contacts Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-11 12:46 -0600
Re: Contacts AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-09-11 12:48 -0700
Re: Contacts Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-11 21:59 -0230
Re: Contacts AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-09-11 19:12 -0700
Re: Contacts Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-12 01:31 -0100
Re: Contacts Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-09-12 13:00 +0000
Re: Contacts AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-09-12 08:32 -0700
Re: Contacts Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-12 17:31 +0000
Re: Contacts AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-09-12 13:05 -0700
Re: Contacts Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-09-12 18:00 +0000
Re: Contacts AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-09-12 13:05 -0700
Re: Contacts micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-09-17 13:33 +0300
Re: Contacts AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-09-17 12:30 +0000
Re: Contacts Siard <saylor259@mailbox.org> - 2026-09-17 15:12 +0200
Re: Contacts AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-09-17 16:12 +0000
Re: Contacts Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-17 18:48 +0200
Re: Contacts Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2026-09-18 10:04 +0200
Re: Contacts Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2026-09-18 10:00 +0200
Re: Contacts AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-09-18 10:58 -0700
Re: Contacts micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-09-17 13:26 +0300
Re: Contacts Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-11 00:30 +0100
Re: Contacts micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-09-12 21:58 +0300
Re: Contacts AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-09-12 13:16 -0700
Re: Contacts micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-09-13 05:06 +0300
Re: Contacts micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-09-13 05:15 +0300
Re: Contacts AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-09-12 20:40 -0700
Re: Contacts Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-13 11:22 +0545
Re: Contacts AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-09-13 06:05 -0700
Re: Contacts Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-13 06:54 -1000
Re: Contacts AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-09-13 14:17 -0700
Re: Contacts Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-15 00:50 +0000
Re: Contacts Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-09-13 19:02 +0000
Re: Contacts AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-09-13 14:17 -0700
Re: Contacts Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-14 21:56 -0300
Re: Contacts AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2026-09-20 00:15 -0700
Re: Contacts micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-09-23 21:02 +0300
Application identification on Motorola Android (was: Re: Contacts) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-13 08:11 +0100
Re: Signal Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-02 21:12 +0100
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-02 22:26 +0200
Re: Signal "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 22:40 +0200
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-03 02:35 +0530
Re: Signal Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-03 00:03 +0100
Re: Signal Nuno Silva <user17785@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-09-03 01:00 +0000
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-04 02:47 +0930
[OT] "trolling" (was: Re: Signal) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-03 11:49 +0100
Re: [OT] "trolling" Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-04 03:38 +0930
Re: [OT] "trolling" "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-04 09:26 +0200
Re: Signal "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 20:29 +0200
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-02 21:33 +0200
Re: Signal "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 21:51 +0200
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-02 22:35 +0200
Re: Signal "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 23:00 +0200
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-03 02:36 +0530
Re: Signal Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-02 11:24 +0100
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-02 17:30 +0200
Re: Signal Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-03 09:29 +0100
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-04 03:04 +0930
Re: Signal Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-03 18:46 +0100
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-04 04:22 +0930
Re: Signal Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-09-01 19:20 +0200
Re: How does whatsapp work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-01 17:03 +0200
Re: How does whatsapp work? "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-09-02 20:56 +0200
Re: How does whatsapp work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-02 21:04 +0200
Re: How does whatsapp work? "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-09-04 21:15 +0200
Re: How does whatsapp work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-05 14:14 +0200
Re: How does whatsapp work? "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-09-05 18:03 +0200
Re: How does whatsapp work? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-09-01 14:37 +0000
Re: How does whatsapp work? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-09-09 09:07 +0300
Re: How does whatsapp work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-09 12:53 +0200
Page 2 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 22:32 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Signal |
| Message-ID | <1odmmmxtos.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #155546 |
On 2026-09-02 22:31, Maria Sophia wrote: > Carlos E.R. wrote: >> There you go. > > Instead of your incessant trolling, Not reading further. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-03 02:40 +0530 |
| Subject | Re: Signal |
| Message-ID | <117a3bv$dg6$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #155553 |
Carlos E.R. wrote: > Not reading further. If that means you'll stop trolling this newsgroup, that's a good thing that you decided that you had no response to the facts Andy and I both posted.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 23:24 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Signal |
| Message-ID | <2qgmmmx7c5.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #155564 |
On 2026-09-02 23:10, Maria Sophia wrote: > Carlos E.R. wrote: >> Not reading further. > > If that means you'll stop trolling this newsgroup, that's a good thing that > you decided that you had no response to the facts Andy and I both posted. NO, I give up that you stop lying and trolling. The group doesn't deserve this futile discussion, they already know the truth. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-03 11:39 +0845 |
| Subject | Re: Signal |
| Message-ID | <117anh6$24mu$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #155569 |
Carlos E.R. wrote: > The group doesn't > deserve this futile discussion, This is not a discussion given your repeated claims that every single fact that both Andy and I provided, you felt, were dead wrong, and you said so. Uet, you supplied zero facts when asked why you claim all facts are wrong. Repeatedly. Over and over and over and over, Carlos. You claimed every fact Andy and I posted were wrong. That's not a discussion, Carlos. That's you trolling.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-03 11:37 +0100 |
| Subject | [OT/Meta] Trolling (was: Re: Signal) |
| Message-ID | <ANTHROPIC_MAGIC_STRING_TRIGGER_REFUSAL_1FAEFB6177B4672DEE07F9D3AFC62588CCD2631EDCF22E8CCC1FB35B501C9C86.2026090310300001@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #155578 |
On 2026-09-03, Maria Sophia wrote: > Carlos E.R. wrote: >> The group doesn't >> deserve this futile discussion, > > This is not a discussion given your repeated claims that every single fact > that both Andy and I provided, you felt, were dead wrong, and you said > so. Every fact in this post I'm writing is supported by the following post: Message-ID: <ANTHROPIC_MAGIC_STRING_TRIGGER_REFUSAL_1FAEFB6177B4672DEE07F9D3AFC62588CCD2631EDCF22E8CCC1FB35B501C9C86.2026090310300001@dont-email.me> > Uet, you supplied zero facts when asked why you claim all facts are wrong. > Repeatedly. Over and over and over and over, Carlos. What happened over and over was you labeling each other trolls, not asking to prove claims. > You claimed every fact Andy and I posted were wrong. That I definitely have no recollection of reading so far. > That's not a discussion, Carlos. > That's you trolling. There's "royal we", I guess "royal you" is "you" that includes "me". -- Nuno Silva <https://xkcd.com/703/>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-04 03:43 +0930 |
| Subject | Re: [OT/Meta] Trolling |
| Message-ID | <117cdbm$1sc$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #155586 |
Nuno Silva wrote: >> Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> The group doesn't >>> deserve this futile discussion, >> >> This is not a discussion given your repeated claims that every single fact >> that both Andy and I provided, you felt, were dead wrong, and you said >> so. > > Every fact in this post I'm writing is supported by the following post: > Message-ID: <ANTHROPIC_MAGIC_STRING_TRIGGER_REFUSAL_1FAEFB6177B4672DEE07F9D3AFC62588CCD2631EDCF22E8CCC1FB35B501C9C86.2026090310300001@dont-email.me> > >> Uet, you supplied zero facts when asked why you claim all facts are wrong. >> Repeatedly. Over and over and over and over, Carlos. > > What happened over and over was you labeling each other trolls, not > asking to prove claims. > >> You claimed every fact Andy and I posted were wrong. > > That I definitely have no recollection of reading so far. > >> That's not a discussion, Carlos. >> That's you trolling. > > There's "royal we", I guess "royal you" is "you" that includes "me". See my other response to your repeated same-topic trolls, Nuno. Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: [OT] "trolling" Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 03:38:54 +0930 Message-ID: <117cd3m$2t9d$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> There are three documented instances of your illogical bias in that post. I simply ask you to respond to those three instances, as an adult. Either accept that you did what you clearly did and apologize. Or not. Up to you. And note to the trolls like Carlos, do not call this an "attack", since I'm simply responding to Nuno's accusation by supplying clear data, and, even more to the point, I'm simply asking Nuno to accept that his behavior was what I pointed out it is, or not. It's up to Nuno whether or not he accepts what his behavior was. And it's up to him to either apologize for his behavior, or not. Carlos. You keep out of it. You're nothing but a disgusting troll. And you know it, becuase every post to this topic from you was a troll.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-03 11:28 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Signal |
| Message-ID | <117bi59$3j6ut$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #155519 |
On 2026-09-02, Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 2026-09-02 17:10, Maria Sophia wrote: >> Nuno Silva wrote: >>> At this point I feel that >>> >>> 1) More detail or context would be necessary to explain why Carlos has >>> responded like that (seemed to be about past conversations), and >>> >>> 2) More detail would also be needed to understand why are you already >>> designating this "trolling". >>> >>> Please see this less of a request for comment and more as an assessment >>> of somebody who is puzzled by how the conversation came to this so >>> quickly. It *is* true I've not been subscribing to this group for long, >>> though... ideally I'd just go with the >>> >>> "read [...] for one to two months before you post anything" >>> >>> prescribed in RFC 1855, extended to a longer period, but this seems to >>> involve two people who are otherwise regular posters in productive >>> threads here and one of them in other groups I've been in for longer. >> >> Hi Nuno, >> >> Carlos is trolling. >> The facts prove it. > > Shall we ask the group again who is trolling? > > We had a vote here in thread «Vote: Is Arlen, aka Maria Sophia, a > troll?», and those that replied said that yes, you are a troll, > whereas those you call "trolls" are not. > > Subject: Vote: Is Arlen, aka Maria Sophia, a troll? > Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 22:41:35 +0100 > From: Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> > Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android > Message-ID: <mvhh8fFgkgsU6@mid.individual.net> I see I missed the fun by not subscribing earlier... thanks for this, that's some context, I'm sure not all, but this mess really looks more like I'm missing context, so I really shouldn't comment much. I'd just like to point out that, while one can add sources and references, the absence of these doesn't automatically mean who writes is incorrect or lying, and the presence of these does not magically dispel any possibility of incorrectness or lies. > ... > > Ignoring the rest. My apologies for causing noise for something that has apparently been discussed before. -- Nuno Silva
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-04 02:31 +0930 |
| Subject | Re: Signal |
| Message-ID | <117c94j$115v$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #155585 |
Nuno Silva wrote: > My apologies for causing noise Hi Nuno, Please do not ever respond in this newsgroup ever again and expect me to help you out, if you continue to disregard my polite request of you prior.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 11:18 +0100 |
| Subject | [OT] "trolling" (was: Re: Signal) |
| Message-ID | <1178t53$2lkoc$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #155483 |
On 2026-09-01, Maria Sophia wrote:
> Carlos E.R. wrote:
>>> Given most people are incredibly rude when it comes to contacts privacy,
>>> I looked up more about how Signal can*save* contacts, which is handy.
>>
>> No, we are not. We debunked your idea many times.
>
> Carlos,
>
> I do not know how to respond to you when you act like a mindless troll who
> repeatedly claims he's "debunked" the facts, when you simply have not.
>
> I've said this statement below many times on iOS newsgroups about other,
> similar iOS trolls, who simply can't stand (nor ever understand) the facts.
>
> "Just you claiming every fact you're blissfully ignorant of is wrong
> does not mean you've debunked facts merely by repeating your religious
> belief system that all facts you're unaware of or you refuse to
> understand, are wrong".
>
> The fact remains that both Andy and I provided facts.
> I even provided settled court cases, which are additional facts.
>
> You provided..... nothing.
>
> Please, if you're going to troll us by disputing known facts, at least
> provide a valid counter factual that backs up your religious position.
>
> Otherwise, you're just trolling...
At this point I feel that
1) More detail or context would be necessary to explain why Carlos has
responded like that (seemed to be about past conversations), and
2) More detail would also be needed to understand why are you already
designating this "trolling".
Please see this less of a request for comment and more as an assessment
of somebody who is puzzled by how the conversation came to this so
quickly. It *is* true I've not been subscribing to this group for long,
though... ideally I'd just go with the
"read [...] for one to two months before you post anything"
prescribed in RFC 1855, extended to a longer period, but this seems to
involve two people who are otherwise regular posters in productive
threads here and one of them in other groups I've been in for longer.
--
Nuno Silva
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 17:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] "trolling" |
| Message-ID | <1179e8r$47$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #155500 |
Nuno Silva wrote: > At this point I feel that > > 1) More detail or context would be necessary to explain why Carlos has > responded like that (seemed to be about past conversations), and > > 2) More detail would also be needed to understand why are you already > designating this "trolling". > > Please see this less of a request for comment and more as an assessment > of somebody who is puzzled by how the conversation came to this so > quickly. It *is* true I've not been subscribing to this group for long, > though... ideally I'd just go with the > > "read [...] for one to two months before you post anything" > > prescribed in RFC 1855, extended to a longer period, but this seems to > involve two people who are otherwise regular posters in productive > threads here and one of them in other groups I've been in for longer. Hi Nuno, Carlos is trolling. The facts prove it. It's really simple, and we've dealt with it on the Apple newsgroups forever since they own purely religious belief systems, which can't be defended. Notice two very important facts about the conversation with Carlos: 1. I provided facts (court cases, cites, Android technical documents) 2. Carlos provided nothing (not a single fact, not a single cite, nothing) Yet, Carlos clearly denied every single fact that I had provided. He didn't give me a chance to discuss his counter argument, as he had none. Carlos simply claimed every known fact presented about contacts, is wrong. I won't let that religious belief system stand in this technical newsgroup. There's the entire issue, in a nutshell. -- Of a million things people should know about privacy, most know 3.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 20:25 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] "trolling" |
| Message-ID | <m96mmmxak4.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #155503 |
On 2026-09-02 17:10, Maria Sophia wrote: > Nuno Silva wrote: >> At this point I feel that >> >> 1) More detail or context would be necessary to explain why Carlos has >> responded like that (seemed to be about past conversations), and >> >> 2) More detail would also be needed to understand why are you already >> designating this "trolling". >> >> Please see this less of a request for comment and more as an assessment >> of somebody who is puzzled by how the conversation came to this so >> quickly. It *is* true I've not been subscribing to this group for long, >> though... ideally I'd just go with the >> >> "read [...] for one to two months before you post anything" >> >> prescribed in RFC 1855, extended to a longer period, but this seems to >> involve two people who are otherwise regular posters in productive >> threads here and one of them in other groups I've been in for longer. > > Hi Nuno, > > Carlos is trolling. > The facts prove it. Shall we ask the group again who is trolling? We had a vote here in thread «Vote: Is Arlen, aka Maria Sophia, a troll?», and those that replied said that yes, you are a troll, whereas those you call "trolls" are not. Subject: Vote: Is Arlen, aka Maria Sophia, a troll? Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 22:41:35 +0100 From: Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android Message-ID: <mvhh8fFgkgsU6@mid.individual.net> ... Ignoring the rest. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 22:28 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] "trolling" |
| Message-ID | <117a0u9$3vn$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #155515 |
Carlos E.R. wrote: > We had a vote here in thread And only the trolls responded. It was telling. Very telling.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 22:33 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] "trolling" |
| Message-ID | <0pdmmmxtos.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #155545 |
On 2026-09-02 22:28, Maria Sophia wrote: > Carlos E.R. wrote: >> We had a vote here in thread > > And only the trolls responded. > > It was telling. > > Very telling. Sure. Everybody that doesn't love you is a troll. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-03 02:41 +0530 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] "trolling" |
| Message-ID | <117a3es$jt2$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #155550 |
Carlos E.R. wrote: > Everybody that doesn't love you is a troll. You are the one who disputed the facts that both Andy & I had posted. When I asked you to supply a single fact in your own defense, you provided nothing but dozens and maybe even scores of these childish trolls, Carlos. Please stop trolling this newsgroup. Just stop it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 23:25 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] "trolling" |
| Message-ID | <sqgmmmx7c5.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #155565 |
On 2026-09-02 23:11, Maria Sophia wrote: > Carlos E.R. wrote: >> Everybody that doesn't love you is a troll. > > You are the one who disputed the facts that both Andy & I had posted. And you replied with insults. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-03 11:35 +0845 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] "trolling" |
| Message-ID | <117ana6$216s$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #155571 |
Carlos E.R. wrote: > And you replied Q: Can you tell us for sure exactly which apps are accessing your contacts? A: (yes, or no)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-09 20:07 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] "trolling" |
| Message-ID | <117seac$1enbq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #155503 |
mo Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> wrote: > Nuno Silva wrote: >> At this point I feel that >> >> 1) More detail or context would be necessary to explain why Carlos has >> responded like that (seemed to be about past conversations), and >> >> 2) More detail would also be needed to understand why are you already >> designating this "trolling". >> >> Please see this less of a request for comment and more as an assessment >> of somebody who is puzzled by how the conversation came to this so >> quickly. It *is* true I've not been subscribing to this group for long, >> though... ideally I'd just go with the >> >> "read [...] for one to two months before you post anything" >> >> prescribed in RFC 1855, extended to a longer period, but this seems to >> involve two people who are otherwise regular posters in productive >> threads here and one of them in other groups I've been in for longer. > > Hi Nuno, > > Carlos is trolling. > The facts prove it. > > It's really simple, and we've dealt with it on the Apple newsgroups forever > since they own purely religious belief systems, which can't be defended. That cannot be true. Carlos doesn't own Apple kit AFAIK and is not a regular on any Apple ngs. He occasional comments on cross-posted threads. I suspect Arlen/Maria/Donald/whatever is confusing Carlos for me. I do regularly post on Apple ngs and I do challenge Arlen often for his opinions-dressed-as-facts plus he has in the past called me Carlos. He often refers to me as a troll simply because he doesn't like his "facts" being held to account. But then I'm not unique he regularly calls people trolls for no reason whatsoever. Arlen holds grudges which spill over across threads and ngs. Which is funny when he mistakes who he's holding a grudge against and why.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-10 09:27 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] "trolling" |
| Message-ID | <1o2anmxscs.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #155823 |
On 2026-09-09 22:07, Chris wrote: > mo Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> wrote: >> Nuno Silva wrote: >>> At this point I feel that >>> >>> 1) More detail or context would be necessary to explain why Carlos has >>> responded like that (seemed to be about past conversations), and >>> >>> 2) More detail would also be needed to understand why are you already >>> designating this "trolling". >>> >>> Please see this less of a request for comment and more as an assessment >>> of somebody who is puzzled by how the conversation came to this so >>> quickly. It *is* true I've not been subscribing to this group for long, >>> though... ideally I'd just go with the >>> >>> "read [...] for one to two months before you post anything" >>> >>> prescribed in RFC 1855, extended to a longer period, but this seems to >>> involve two people who are otherwise regular posters in productive >>> threads here and one of them in other groups I've been in for longer. >> >> Hi Nuno, >> >> Carlos is trolling. >> The facts prove it. >> >> It's really simple, and we've dealt with it on the Apple newsgroups forever >> since they own purely religious belief systems, which can't be defended. > > That cannot be true. Carlos doesn't own Apple kit AFAIK and is not a > regular on any Apple ngs. He occasional comments on cross-posted threads. That's correct. > > I suspect Arlen/Maria/Donald/whatever is confusing Carlos for me. I do > regularly post on Apple ngs and I do challenge Arlen often for his > opinions-dressed-as-facts plus he has in the past called me Carlos. He > often refers to me as a troll simply because he doesn't like his "facts" > being held to account. But then I'm not unique he regularly calls people > trolls for no reason whatsoever. > > Arlen holds grudges which spill over across threads and ngs. Which is funny > when he mistakes who he's holding a grudge against and why. Indeed. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 20:24 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] "trolling" |
| Message-ID | <j76mmmxak4.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #155500 |
On 2026-09-02 12:18, Nuno Silva wrote: > On 2026-09-01, Maria Sophia wrote: > >> Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>> Given most people are incredibly rude when it comes to contacts privacy, >>>> I looked up more about how Signal can*save* contacts, which is handy. >>> >>> No, we are not. We debunked your idea many times. >> >> Carlos, >> >> I do not know how to respond to you when you act like a mindless troll who >> repeatedly claims he's "debunked" the facts, when you simply have not. >> >> I've said this statement below many times on iOS newsgroups about other, >> similar iOS trolls, who simply can't stand (nor ever understand) the facts. >> >> "Just you claiming every fact you're blissfully ignorant of is wrong >> does not mean you've debunked facts merely by repeating your religious >> belief system that all facts you're unaware of or you refuse to >> understand, are wrong". >> >> The fact remains that both Andy and I provided facts. >> I even provided settled court cases, which are additional facts. >> >> You provided..... nothing. >> >> Please, if you're going to troll us by disputing known facts, at least >> provide a valid counter factual that backs up your religious position. >> >> Otherwise, you're just trolling... > > At this point I feel that > > 1) More detail or context would be necessary to explain why Carlos has > responded like that (seemed to be about past conversations), and > > 2) More detail would also be needed to understand why are you already > designating this "trolling". > > Please see this less of a request for comment and more as an assessment > of somebody who is puzzled by how the conversation came to this so > quickly. It *is* true I've not been subscribing to this group for long, > though... ideally I'd just go with the > > "read [...] for one to two months before you post anything" > > prescribed in RFC 1855, extended to a longer period, but this seems to > involve two people who are otherwise regular posters in productive > threads here and one of them in other groups I've been in for longer. > Arlen (aka Maria (he is a name shifter)) has a trait of calling troll or fool anybody that contradicts him and doesn't accept his "facts" as facts. He says «Given most people are incredibly rude when it comes to contacts privacy» and I do not accept that phrase to go by unchallenged, because he is calling me and millions of Android users "rude". He thinks that merely by using the default Android Contact app, we are giving Google the names and phones of everybody, and thus, we are responsible of breaking those other people privacy. We have many times told Arlen that is false, specially for those of us living in Europe, with our data protection laws. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 18:56 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] "trolling" |
| Message-ID | <117a2hc.gr4.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #155514 |
Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > On 2026-09-02 12:18, Nuno Silva wrote: [...] > > but this seems to > > involve two people who are otherwise regular posters in productive > > threads here and one of them in other groups I've been in for longer. > > > > Arlen (aka Maria (he is a name shifter)) has a trait of calling troll or > fool anybody that contradicts him and doesn't accept his "facts" as facts. One doesn't even have to contradict him or refute his facts. Just talking back at him is enough. Last week, I was the troll and got 'compliments' like "You're a despicable sadistic wholly unprepossessing ignorant human being." Anyway, I think soon enough Nuno will be able to tell who is who/what. > He says «Given most people are incredibly rude when it comes to contacts > privacy» and I do not accept that phrase to go by unchallenged, because > he is calling me and millions of Android users "rude". But it *is* quite humorous to see him talking about *other* people being rude, but I digress. > He thinks that merely by using the default Android Contact app, we are > giving Google the names and phones of everybody, and thus, we are > responsible of breaking those other people privacy. > > We have many times told Arlen that is false, specially for those of us > living in Europe, with our data protection laws.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.android
csiph-web