Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #147317
| From | Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-10, uk.telecom.mobile, comp.mobile.android |
| Subject | Re: OT: spam phone calls |
| Date | 2025-03-20 15:21 +0000 |
| Organization | Frantic |
| Message-ID | <861purzq0d.fsf@example.com> (permalink) |
| References | <vrh0k4$36vfn$1@dont-email.me> <8kjtalxutn.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> writes: > On 2025-03-20 13:10, Graham J wrote: >> I know you're all very knowledgeable here, so: > > There are groups more appropriate to phone trouble, like > comp.mobile.android or uk.telecom.mobile. I have added them both to > this post, so they will see your post below. > >> Received a call on my mobile, from a lady in Scotland who says I rang >> her landline earlier this morning. I did not, and my mobile phone >> has been sitting on the windowsill (being the only place it can get a >> signal) all morning, with nobody near it. The lady used 1471 to find >> out who had rung her number, and used it's recall facility to ring >> me; so she didn't make any transcription error in dialling my number. >> I'm aware that spammers spoof mobile numbers but had always assumed >> that they chose unallocated numbers. That is now apparently no >> longer true - unless all you here can think of another way that the >> 1471 service can see an erroneous number. > > I thought Britain had some new regulation about faking the A number in > a call. > > I never return phone calls from unknown numbers. Only when I know the > number is from some friend or family I return the call, but I prefer > to let them try again, maybe they got interrupted. It doesn't yet cover spoofed mobile numbers in caller-id.
Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: OT: spam phone calls "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-03-20 15:00 +0100
Re: OT: spam phone calls Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2025-03-20 15:21 +0000
Re: OT: spam phone calls D <noreply@mixmin.net> - 2025-03-20 16:27 +0000
Re: OT: spam phone calls Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-03-20 18:53 +0100
Re: OT: spam phone calls Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2025-03-20 18:39 +0000
Re: OT: spam phone calls Jason H <jason_hindle@yehoo.com> - 2025-05-07 15:20 +0100
Re: OT: spam phone calls David Woolley <david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid> - 2025-05-07 20:39 +0100
Re: OT: spam phone calls Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2025-05-13 22:48 +1000
Re: OT: spam phone calls "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-05-07 22:34 +0200
Re: OT: spam phone calls David Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid> - 2025-03-20 15:50 +0000
Re: OT: spam phone calls "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-03-20 22:32 +0100
Re: OT: spam phone calls Philip Herlihy <nothing@invalid.com> - 2025-03-21 12:18 +0000
Re: OT: spam phone calls "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-04-09 12:50 +0200
Re: OT: spam phone calls "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-05-13 15:09 +0200
Re: OT: spam phone calls Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-05-13 16:08 +0200
Re: OT: spam phone calls "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-05-13 20:37 +0200
Re: OT: spam phone calls Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-05-13 21:27 +0200
Re: OT: spam phone calls Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2025-05-15 20:59 +1000
Re: OT: spam phone calls "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-05-15 13:40 +0200
Re: OT: spam phone calls JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2025-05-15 17:05 +0100
csiph-web