Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" |
| Date | Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:56:37 +0000 |
| Lines | 8 |
| Message-ID | <lb0bva-kui.ln1@squidward.local.dionic.net> (permalink) |
| References | <lfrsi7$pv5$1@solani.org> <lfu5cv$p47$1@dont-email.me> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net 3j1XJpXlHJ8jbvobE7R0cAdQqHVMwkrR73F18brA2X+w6SZyhZ |
| X-Orig-Path | squidward.local.dionic.net!not-for-mail |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:zESQoYmVZ3+oW+xaQw5SuQhUZ2M= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <lfu5cv$p47$1@dont-email.me> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.misc:1581 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 14/03/14 05:51, Oregonian Haruspex wrote: > On 2014-03-13 09:08:23 +0000, RS Wood said: > What would really be lost if all advertising-driven web sites failed? > Not much. I say we call their bluff anyway. > Bye bye google.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-03-13 09:08 +0000
Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-13 22:51 -0700
Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2014-03-14 09:56 +0000
Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2014-03-14 10:56 +0000
Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2014-03-14 11:35 +0000
Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Morten Nygaard Åsnes <mnaasnes@gmail.com> - 2014-03-14 13:41 +0100
Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" greymausg <maus@mail.com> - 2014-03-14 16:55 +0000
Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-14 13:20 -0700
Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Johny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2014-03-14 16:51 +0000
Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-03-16 05:34 +0100
Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" greymausg <maus@mail.com> - 2014-03-16 10:55 +0000
Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-03-16 19:40 +0100
Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2014-03-15 20:24 +0000
Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-03-16 05:16 +0100
Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-17 16:54 -0700
Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Johny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2014-03-14 16:38 +0000
csiph-web