Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Tim Watts Newsgroups: comp.misc Subject: Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:56:37 +0000 Lines: 8 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net 3j1XJpXlHJ8jbvobE7R0cAdQqHVMwkrR73F18brA2X+w6SZyhZ X-Orig-Path: squidward.local.dionic.net!not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:zESQoYmVZ3+oW+xaQw5SuQhUZ2M= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.misc:1581 On 14/03/14 05:51, Oregonian Haruspex wrote: > On 2014-03-13 09:08:23 +0000, RS Wood said: > What would really be lost if all advertising-driven web sites failed? > Not much. I say we call their bluff anyway. > Bye bye google.