Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | polygonum <rmoudndgers@vrod.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: SwiftKey vulnerability lets hackers easily take control of devices |
| Date | 2015-06-27 13:14 +0100 |
| Organization | me |
| Message-ID | <cv7idbFt0j2U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <cuhueuF2bg0U1@mid.individual.net> <telooa93na8krrga22c1rfi72mjdfpiuqt@4ax.com> <cv4jc5F5ovaU2@mid.individual.net> <mmkpfi$j83$1@mduffy.eternal-september.org> <cv747rFpercU1@mid.individual.net> |
On 27/06/2015 09:12, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 27/06/2015 10:08 AM, Mike Duffy wrote: >> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 19:12:37 +1000, Sylvia Else wrote: >> >>> Unless the relevant consumer laws state otherwise, it would be against >>> Samsung, since the consumer has no contract with Swiftkey. >> >> Did you ever read (all the way to the end) the Samsung licence >> agrreement? >> >> I gave up and turned off auto-update of my phone when I got to the >> special >> section for Quebec. I am not a lawyer, but on the face of it it looks >> imperturbably unenforceable according to Quebec law. >> >> Quebec law clearly states that french documents where available take >> precedence over english translations under the civil code. But the Quebec >> addendum (in french) states that the english copy of the contract takes >> precedence over the french translation. So you end up with a circular >> reference in the legal precedence relationship of the two versions. >> > > I suspect many software licence agreements are, at least in part, > unenforceable, particularly where the software comes as a necessary > adjunct to a physical object such as a phone. > > In the present case, even if the licence agreement purported to limit > Samsung's liability in respect of the software, that would fail to get > past consumer protection laws in jurisdictions such as Australia, where > the law expressly prevents a supplier from contracting out of its > liabilities under the law. > > Sylvia. The issue for me, right now, is to find out what I can do about it, or even if it affects me. I don't remember the last update my Samsung S2 got! Sat with JellyBean 4.1.2 from 2013. I don't want to get rid the phone yet (am waiting to make a decision about replacement as the rest of this year's phones get released). Indeed, is the keyboard software -- Rod
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
SwiftKey vulnerability lets hackers easily take control of devices Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-06-19 17:25 +1000
Re: SwiftKey vulnerability lets hackers easily take control of devices voyager529 <voyager529@live.com> - 2015-06-25 15:27 -0400
Re: SwiftKey vulnerability lets hackers easily take control of devices Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-06-26 19:12 +1000
Re: SwiftKey vulnerability lets hackers easily take control of devices Mike Duffy <see_website@signature.block> - 2015-06-26 20:08 -0400
Re: SwiftKey vulnerability lets hackers easily take control of devices Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-06-27 08:12 +0300
Re: SwiftKey vulnerability lets hackers easily take control of devices Mike Duffy <see_website@signature.block> - 2015-06-27 01:24 -0400
Re: SwiftKey vulnerability lets hackers easily take control of devices Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-06-27 08:29 +0300
Re: SwiftKey vulnerability lets hackers easily take control of devices Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-06-27 18:12 +1000
Re: SwiftKey vulnerability lets hackers easily take control of devices polygonum <rmoudndgers@vrod.co.uk> - 2015-06-27 13:14 +0100
csiph-web