Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Peter Mc Donough <mcd-mail-lists@gmx.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax |
| Date | Sat, 13 Sep 2014 18:08:54 +0200 |
| Lines | 15 |
| Message-ID | <c7j8gmFdi40U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <lup494$hpb$1@speranza.aioe.org> <87tx4bpttn.fsf@physik.rwth-aachen.de> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net HONj/eF16eSjAhU4tYV5KgB5zpVD7IYdNpG417fUf5+WNrEtlq |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:D5Sg5KafxwfCWMCeULFZmqRVMPc= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <87tx4bpttn.fsf@physik.rwth-aachen.de> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.misc:4873 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Am 13.09.2014 um 14:51 schrieb Torsten Bronger: > > See https://wiki.fsfe.org/WindowsTaxRefund > > BTW, yesterday an Italian court decided that Italian customers now > can get refund for unused Microsoft licences. I would sell an computer with a Windows which would leave the computer useless if removed (secure boot). Should be no problem if clearly stated on the box. How many customers would care? cu Peter
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The pernicious Microsoft tax Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-09-10 10:05 +0100
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-10 09:50 +0000
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-09-10 10:58 +0100
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-09-10 12:57 +0300
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-09-10 19:20 +0000
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-09-10 23:55 +0100
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-09-11 08:53 +0000
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> - 2014-09-10 18:00 +0100
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-09-10 13:25 -0400
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> - 2014-09-10 18:44 +0100
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-09-10 21:46 +0100
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2014-09-11 11:04 +0300
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Peter Mc Donough <mcd-mail-lists@gmx.net> - 2014-09-10 19:29 +0200
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2014-09-10 21:37 +0000
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax greymausg <maus@mail.com> - 2014-09-12 20:35 +0000
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-09-12 23:51 -0400
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-09-13 08:15 +0100
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Torsten Bronger <bronger@physik.rwth-aachen.de> - 2014-09-13 14:51 +0200
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Peter Mc Donough <mcd-mail-lists@gmx.net> - 2014-09-13 18:08 +0200
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Torsten Bronger <bronger@physik.rwth-aachen.de> - 2014-09-13 18:19 +0200
csiph-web