Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Torsten Bronger <bronger@physik.rwth-aachen.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax |
| Date | 2014-09-13 14:51 +0200 |
| Organization | Phoenix Foundation |
| Message-ID | <87tx4bpttn.fsf@physik.rwth-aachen.de> (permalink) |
| References | <lup494$hpb$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
Hallöchen!
Hils writes:
> (A bit of a rant...)
>
> A few days ago I called into my local computer shop. They had some
> neat-looking, well-specced laptops at a good price, and as my
> current model is nearly six years old I asked the owner of the
> shop whether he could supply any without operating systems. His
> face dropped as he said that he had been unable to find any
> suppliers of laptops without Windows pre-installed, though he was
> still looking.
See https://wiki.fsfe.org/WindowsTaxRefund
BTW, yesterday an Italian court decided that Italian customers now
can get refund for unused Microsoft licences.
Tschö,
Torsten.
--
Torsten Bronger Jabber ID: torsten.bronger@jabber.rwth-aachen.de
or http://bronger-jmp.appspot.com
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The pernicious Microsoft tax Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-09-10 10:05 +0100
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-10 09:50 +0000
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-09-10 10:58 +0100
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-09-10 12:57 +0300
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-09-10 19:20 +0000
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-09-10 23:55 +0100
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-09-11 08:53 +0000
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> - 2014-09-10 18:00 +0100
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-09-10 13:25 -0400
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> - 2014-09-10 18:44 +0100
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-09-10 21:46 +0100
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2014-09-11 11:04 +0300
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Peter Mc Donough <mcd-mail-lists@gmx.net> - 2014-09-10 19:29 +0200
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2014-09-10 21:37 +0000
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax greymausg <maus@mail.com> - 2014-09-12 20:35 +0000
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-09-12 23:51 -0400
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-09-13 08:15 +0100
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Torsten Bronger <bronger@physik.rwth-aachen.de> - 2014-09-13 14:51 +0200
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Peter Mc Donough <mcd-mail-lists@gmx.net> - 2014-09-13 18:08 +0200
Re: The pernicious Microsoft tax Torsten Bronger <bronger@physik.rwth-aachen.de> - 2014-09-13 18:19 +0200
csiph-web