Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Desktop in the Cloud |
| Date | 2014-03-05 09:18 +0000 |
| Organization | Piglet's Pickles & Preserves |
| Message-ID | <bno8foFjltkU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <levegf$43r$1@solani.org> <4902#15466@usenet.squte.com> <bnkcvdFpgl9U1@mid.individual.net> |
On 2014-03-03, polygonum <rmoudndgers@vrod.co.uk> wrote: > On 03/03/2014 21:13, jonh wrote: >> From the 1950's to the 70's, most terminals were thin terminals >> connected to mainframes, so in one sense the current "cloud" trend is >> just a swing back towards that kind of thin-client/fat-server model >> (although admittedly, today's this clients are orders of magnitude more >> capable than, say, a VT100). I wouldn't be surprised if we see the trend >> swing back towards fat clients in the next 15 years or so. >> >> Actually, I suppose that one difference between the mainframe era and >> the cloud era is that companies actually owned the mainframes that they >> stored all their data on, so there is that, but it seems that people are >> learning (one way or another) that owning your data storage is actually >> a really good idea. > > I could be wrong here, but I was under the impression that much > mainframe kit was supplied under complex leasing arrangements rather > than purchase. This meaning that ownership remained either with the > manufacturer or a leasing company. Correct. And the tense is "is", rather than "was". IBM *still* lease mainframes and charge per CPU cycle. -- Today is Prickle-Prickle, the 64th day of Chaos in the YOLD 3180 "Mistake Not My Current State Of Joshing Gentle Peevishness For The Awesome And Terrible Majesty Of The Towering Seas Of Ire That Are Themselves The Milquetoast Shallows Fringing My Vast Oceans Of Wrath"
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Desktop in the Cloud RS Wood <rswood@therandymon.com> - 2014-03-02 14:16 +0000
Re: Desktop in the Cloud Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-03-02 13:01 -0300
Re: Desktop in the Cloud 2phar <none@example.com> - 2014-03-03 08:58 -0500
Re: Desktop in the Cloud Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2014-03-03 18:02 +0100
Re: Desktop in the Cloud Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-03-03 21:48 -0300
Re: Desktop in the Cloud "jonh" <jon@nada-sub.co.uk> - 2014-03-03 15:13 -0600
Re: Desktop in the Cloud polygonum <rmoudndgers@vrod.co.uk> - 2014-03-03 22:10 +0000
Re: Desktop in the Cloud Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-03-05 09:18 +0000
Re: Desktop in the Cloud Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-03-04 17:07 +0100
csiph-web