Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!usenetcore.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.eclipse.net.uk!news.eclipse.net.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Thu, 08 May 2014 04:55:46 -0500 |
| From | David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Calculator Accuracy |
| References | <lkfa27$661$1@dont-email.me> <mtHav.235783$vM2.115843@fx18.am4> |
| Date | Thu, 08 May 2014 10:55:42 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <83k39w1tnl.fsf@example.com> (permalink) |
| Organization | Linux Private Site |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:Lwd6zBujkw107r9DRP07msKflDI= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Lines | 17 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 81.168.48.70 |
| X-Trace | sv3-mIHW4CU+vxEhbNwwn7VQeqmQOG8tZnBME+kmrAs+20n3PiSCmQScWB6Mb2fMqym/U2wt91alSMwPdS3!bL6VujEp4LlikhtLQCXn2St+bB0k3l1t6Yd37ldWtM/M1H7PlImXQK7Kxfl+1hr4K4c= |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 1415 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.misc:2688 |
Show key headers only | View raw
"BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> writes: > My Casio fx-83 gives 1.2702e-9 degrees (difference from the original 45 > degrees). > > (On this algebraic calculator it's entered as > invsin(invcos(invtan(tan(cos(sin(45))))))-45.) That sounds fun. clisp: (- (* (/ 180 pi) (asin (acos (atan (tan (cos (sin (* (/ pi 180) 45)))))))) 45) -1.7347234759768070944L-17 We have a winner! :D
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Calculator Accuracy Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2014-05-08 07:00 +0000
Re: Calculator Accuracy David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-08 08:39 +0100
Re: Calculator Accuracy Andy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2014-05-08 09:14 +0100
Re: Calculator Accuracy Andy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2014-05-12 19:02 +0100
Re: Calculator Accuracy "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-08 09:43 +0100
Re: Calculator Accuracy Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-08 09:53 +0100
Re: Calculator Accuracy "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-08 10:22 +0100
Re: Calculator Accuracy David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-08 12:17 +0100
Re: Calculator Accuracy RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-08 14:09 +0000
Re: Calculator Accuracy David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Calculator Accuracy Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-08 16:49 +0000
Re: Calculator Accuracy Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-09 00:03 +0000
Re: Calculator Accuracy Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-09 00:10 +0000
Re: Calculator Accuracy RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-09 21:32 +0000
Re: Calculator Accuracy Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-10 03:30 +0000
Re: Calculator Accuracy "G. Paul Ziemba" <paul+usenet@w6yx.stanford.edu> - 2014-05-09 03:43 +0000
Re: Calculator Accuracy David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-08 10:55 +0100
Re: Calculator Accuracy "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-08 11:23 +0100
Re: Calculator Accuracy Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-05-08 12:09 +0100
Re: Calculator Accuracy Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-05-08 23:02 +0100
Re: Calculator Accuracy Marc Auslander <marcslists@gmail.NOSPAM.com> - 2014-05-08 19:51 -0400
Re: Calculator Accuracy Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-05-08 18:19 -0600
Re: Calculator Accuracy Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2014-05-09 15:19 +0300
Re: Calculator Accuracy David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-09 19:06 +0100
Re: Calculator Accuracy Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2014-05-10 08:38 +0300
Re: Calculator Accuracy Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2014-05-12 09:30 +0300
Re: Calculator Accuracy David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-10 00:00 +0100
Re: Calculator Accuracy Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-08 11:40 +0000
Re: Calculator Accuracy Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-08 11:32 +0000
Re: Calculator Accuracy Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2014-05-08 20:20 +0300
Re: Calculator Accuracy Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2014-05-08 17:40 +0000
Re: Calculator Accuracy David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-09 08:43 +0100
Re: Calculator Accuracy Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-09 10:42 +0000
Re: Calculator Accuracy Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2014-05-09 21:56 +0100
Re: Calculator Accuracy Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2014-05-12 13:50 +0100
Re: Calculator Accuracy Caecilius <nospam@spamless.invalid> - 2014-05-08 19:34 +0100
Re: Calculator Accuracy Caecilius <nospam@spamless.invalid> - 2014-05-08 19:38 +0100
Re: Calculator Accuracy Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-05-08 22:06 +0100
Re: Calculator Accuracy Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-10 21:24 +0200
Re: Calculator Accuracy Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-11 16:22 +0000
Re: Calculator Accuracy Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-05-11 15:41 -0600
Re: Calculator Accuracy Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-11 23:02 +0100
Re: Calculator Accuracy David Harmon <source@netcom.com> - 2014-05-12 18:20 -0700
Re: Calculator Accuracy Yeechang Lee <ylee@pobox.com> - 2014-07-25 20:26 -0700
csiph-web