Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.misc > #2733

Re: Calculator Accuracy

Newsgroups comp.misc
From Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name>
Subject Re: Calculator Accuracy
References (1 earlier) <mtHav.235783$vM2.115843@fx18.am4> <83k39w1tnl.fsf@example.com> <lkfom3$7ui$1@speranza.aioe.org> <slrnlmphuk.12h.whynot@orphan.zombinet> <7zwqduj07r.fsf@example.com>
Message-ID <slrnlmreqo.6fi.whynot@orphan.zombinet> (permalink)
Date 2014-05-10 08:38 +0300
Organization SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source

Show all headers | View raw


with <7zwqduj07r.fsf@example.com> David Hume wrote:
> Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> writes:
>> with <lkfom3$7ui$1@speranza.aioe.org> Hils wrote:

>>> [1] -7.105427e-15

Blame Hils, not me.

*SKIP*
>> libc, maybe:
>> 	% perl -MMath::Trig -wle '
>> 	print rad2deg( asin acos atan tan cos sin deg2rad 45 ) - 45'
>> 	7.105427357601e-15
> These aren't the same tests as having the calculator in degrees mode,
> because in these tests when the result of sine is passed to cosine it
> is treated as radians.

Then -- Viva Radians!

	% perl -MMath::Trig -wle '
	sub x_sin { sin deg2rad shift };
	sub x_asin { rad2deg asin shift };
	sub x_cos { cos deg2rad shift };
	sub x_acos { rad2deg acos shift };          
	sub x_tan { tan deg2rad shift };             
	sub x_atan { rad2deg atan shift };           
	print +( x_asin x_acos x_tan x_atan x_cos x_sin 45 ) - 45' 
	4.6604498038505e-11

Now I'm realy interested how much precision I'll need to beat windopws
calculator with Math::BigFloat.

-- 
Torvalds' goal for Linux is very simple: World Domination
Stallman's goal for GNU is even simpler: Freedom

Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Calculator Accuracy Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2014-05-08 07:00 +0000
  Re: Calculator Accuracy David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-08 08:39 +0100
  Re: Calculator Accuracy Andy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2014-05-08 09:14 +0100
    Re: Calculator Accuracy Andy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2014-05-12 19:02 +0100
  Re: Calculator Accuracy "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-08 09:43 +0100
    Re: Calculator Accuracy Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-08 09:53 +0100
      Re: Calculator Accuracy "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-08 10:22 +0100
        Re: Calculator Accuracy David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-08 12:17 +0100
          Re: Calculator Accuracy RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-08 14:09 +0000
            Re: Calculator Accuracy David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-08 16:04 +0100
            Re: Calculator Accuracy Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-08 16:49 +0000
              Re: Calculator Accuracy Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-09 00:03 +0000
            Re: Calculator Accuracy Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-09 00:10 +0000
              Re: Calculator Accuracy RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-09 21:32 +0000
                Re: Calculator Accuracy Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-10 03:30 +0000
            Re: Calculator Accuracy "G. Paul Ziemba" <paul+usenet@w6yx.stanford.edu> - 2014-05-09 03:43 +0000
    Re: Calculator Accuracy David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-08 10:55 +0100
      Re: Calculator Accuracy "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-08 11:23 +0100
      Re: Calculator Accuracy Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-05-08 12:09 +0100
        Re: Calculator Accuracy Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-05-08 23:02 +0100
          Re: Calculator Accuracy Marc Auslander <marcslists@gmail.NOSPAM.com> - 2014-05-08 19:51 -0400
            Re: Calculator Accuracy Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-05-08 18:19 -0600
        Re: Calculator Accuracy Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2014-05-09 15:19 +0300
          Re: Calculator Accuracy David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-09 19:06 +0100
            Re: Calculator Accuracy Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2014-05-10 08:38 +0300
              Re: Calculator Accuracy Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2014-05-12 09:30 +0300
          Re: Calculator Accuracy David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-10 00:00 +0100
      Re: Calculator Accuracy Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-08 11:40 +0000
  Re: Calculator Accuracy Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-08 11:32 +0000
  Re: Calculator Accuracy Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2014-05-08 20:20 +0300
    Re: Calculator Accuracy Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2014-05-08 17:40 +0000
      Re: Calculator Accuracy David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-09 08:43 +0100
        Re: Calculator Accuracy Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-09 10:42 +0000
        Re: Calculator Accuracy Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2014-05-09 21:56 +0100
      Re: Calculator Accuracy Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2014-05-12 13:50 +0100
  Re: Calculator Accuracy Caecilius <nospam@spamless.invalid> - 2014-05-08 19:34 +0100
  Re: Calculator Accuracy Caecilius <nospam@spamless.invalid> - 2014-05-08 19:38 +0100
    Re: Calculator Accuracy Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-05-08 22:06 +0100
  Re: Calculator Accuracy Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-10 21:24 +0200
  Re: Calculator Accuracy Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-11 16:22 +0000
    Re: Calculator Accuracy Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-05-11 15:41 -0600
      Re: Calculator Accuracy Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-11 23:02 +0100
  Re: Calculator Accuracy David Harmon <source@netcom.com> - 2014-05-12 18:20 -0700
  Re: Calculator Accuracy Yeechang Lee <ylee@pobox.com> - 2014-07-25 20:26 -0700

csiph-web