Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | 4 horsemen of the infocolypse trotted out in Snowden backlash backlash |
| Date | 2014-05-02 04:43 -0500 |
| Organization | solani.org |
| Message-ID | <5946#0@usenet.squte.com> (permalink) |
GCHQ is whining to the PM that Google and Facebook are now encrypting traffic between their servers [1]. As a redddit [2] commenter explains, this only affects their mass surveillance [3], they can still get a court order for data on specific suspects. The Daily Mail has a typically inflammatory headline [4] "Internet giants including Google and Facebook are shielding terrorists and paedophiles". The comments on the Daily Mail site are more insightful, among the highest rated comments: >"shielding terrorists and paedophiles"? Er no. These demands are not for >this purpose though are they? These endless demands to intrude on the >privacy of people are all about control and agencies hate any control over >their ability [to] abuse it. We already have laws allowing agencies to plant >bugs and spy on people that were supposedly designed to be used only with >terrorists, only to discover that the local councils are using them to spy >on people with a rogue pets, late library books or untidy gardens. This man >can dream on if he thinks the people will be happy with the Big Brother >society he wants. >In other words they are trying to pave the way for the government to control >the Internet by using the same old scare tactics, peadophiles and >terrorists...... >The trouble is the government want blanket surveillance of the all >communications this and the fact that they use their powers for such trivial >matters as name calling & so called "hate crimes" means that their current >stance and statement holds no water for the majority of us. They got caught >out and we just don't trust them any more. If they want data, let them get a >court order for each person and instance and let them have to prove that it >is necessary to collect evidence for terrorism or serious criminal offences. >It looks like the search engines are finally growing a pair and telling the >various agencies where they can stick their unreasonable intrusions into the >British people's privacy. It's only because of the whistle blowers mentioned >that the rest of us know how invasive and unjustifiable these agencies >abuses of power have been and how dishonest they've been regarding who they >say they're after and why. Bring on quantum encryption, it's time to shut >these agencies out for good. I find the mainstream reaction to this interesting. It looks like people are finally picking up on what hactivists have been saying for years. [1] http://techcrunch.com/2014/03/20/gmail-traffic-between-google-servers-now-encrypted-to-thwart-nsa-snooping/ [2] http://www.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/243l02/gchq_goes_to_the_daily_mail_to_complain_that/ [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempora [4] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2614137/Spy-chiefs-warn-PM-Internet-giants-including-Google-Facebook-shielding-terrorists-paedophiles.html -- regards ~tdk View this thread at http://squte.com/node/5946
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
4 horsemen of the infocolypse trotted out in Snowden backlash backlash "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> - 2014-05-02 04:43 -0500 Re: 4 horsemen of the infocolypse trotted out in Snowden backlash backlash RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-05 10:08 +0000
csiph-web