Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #82268

Re: Nested loops is strangely slow, totally at a loss.

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.003
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'method.': 0.07; 'exist,': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'def': 0.12; 'jan': 0.12; '"in"': 0.16; 'does,': 0.16; 'iterator,': 0.16; 'iterators': 0.16; 'itertools': 0.16; 'objects.': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'stuff.': 0.16; 'subject:slow': 0.16; 'think.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'wed,': 0.18; 'tests': 0.22; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'dec': 0.30; 'membership': 0.31; "d'aprano": 0.31; 'steven': 0.31; 'class': 0.32; 'skip:_ 10': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'objects': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'building': 0.35; 'false': 0.36; 'possible': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'range': 0.61; 'specialized': 0.65; "it'd": 0.84; 'n):': 0.84; 'received:fios.verizon.net': 0.84; 'self.n': 0.84; 'received:108': 0.93
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Subject Re: Nested loops is strangely slow, totally at a loss.
Date Wed, 10 Dec 2014 02:16:37 -0500
References <mailman.16794.1418188833.18130.python-list@python.org> <5487ebc7$0$2817$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.com> <CAPTjJmoNrBm=CPuJANyJLg7idYznkF6s4shZ4mSjFjgwbBGnCA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host pool-108-16-203-145.phlapa.fios.verizon.net
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
In-Reply-To <CAPTjJmoNrBm=CPuJANyJLg7idYznkF6s4shZ4mSjFjgwbBGnCA@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.16800.1418195822.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 32
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1418195822 news.xs4all.nl 2889 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57426
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:82268

Show key headers only | View raw


On 12/10/2014 1:53 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> wrote:
>> It would be nice if product iterators behaved like xrange() objects and
>> could perform "in" tests without exhausting the iterator, but they don't.
>> That's sad.
>
> It'd be very difficult to do that in the general sense. But it should
> be possible to have a multi-dimensional range object that behaves the
> way Py3's range object does, including membership tests and stuff.
> (Might already exist, for all I know.) That would do what the OP
> wants, I think.

Itertools are general tools for building specialized objects. 
itertools.product provides the iter method.

class ReitProd():  # untested
     def __init__(self, reiterable, n):
         self.reit = reiterable  # must support 'in'
         self.n = n
     def __iter__(self):
         return itertools.product(self.reit, repeat=self.n)
     def __contains__(self, seq):
	if len(seq) != self.n:
             return False
         for i, item in enumerate(it):
             if item not in self.reit:
                 return False
         return True

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Nested loops is strangely slow, totally at a loss. Shiyao Ma <i@introo.me> - 2014-12-10 13:20 +0800
  Re: Nested loops is strangely slow, totally at a loss. Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-12-10 06:44 +0000
    Re: Nested loops is strangely slow, totally at a loss. Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-12-10 17:53 +1100
      Re: Nested loops is strangely slow, totally at a loss. Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-12-10 07:21 +0000
    Re: Nested loops is strangely slow, totally at a loss. Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-12-10 02:16 -0500

csiph-web