Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #82268
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.003 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'method.': 0.07; 'exist,': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'def': 0.12; 'jan': 0.12; '"in"': 0.16; 'does,': 0.16; 'iterator,': 0.16; 'iterators': 0.16; 'itertools': 0.16; 'objects.': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'stuff.': 0.16; 'subject:slow': 0.16; 'think.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'wed,': 0.18; 'tests': 0.22; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'dec': 0.30; 'membership': 0.31; "d'aprano": 0.31; 'steven': 0.31; 'class': 0.32; 'skip:_ 10': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'objects': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'building': 0.35; 'false': 0.36; 'possible': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'range': 0.61; 'specialized': 0.65; "it'd": 0.84; 'n):': 0.84; 'received:fios.verizon.net': 0.84; 'self.n': 0.84; 'received:108': 0.93 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
| Subject | Re: Nested loops is strangely slow, totally at a loss. |
| Date | Wed, 10 Dec 2014 02:16:37 -0500 |
| References | <mailman.16794.1418188833.18130.python-list@python.org> <5487ebc7$0$2817$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.com> <CAPTjJmoNrBm=CPuJANyJLg7idYznkF6s4shZ4mSjFjgwbBGnCA@mail.gmail.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | pool-108-16-203-145.phlapa.fios.verizon.net |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <CAPTjJmoNrBm=CPuJANyJLg7idYznkF6s4shZ4mSjFjgwbBGnCA@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.16800.1418195822.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 32 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1418195822 news.xs4all.nl 2889 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57426 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:82268 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 12/10/2014 1:53 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> wrote:
>> It would be nice if product iterators behaved like xrange() objects and
>> could perform "in" tests without exhausting the iterator, but they don't.
>> That's sad.
>
> It'd be very difficult to do that in the general sense. But it should
> be possible to have a multi-dimensional range object that behaves the
> way Py3's range object does, including membership tests and stuff.
> (Might already exist, for all I know.) That would do what the OP
> wants, I think.
Itertools are general tools for building specialized objects.
itertools.product provides the iter method.
class ReitProd(): # untested
def __init__(self, reiterable, n):
self.reit = reiterable # must support 'in'
self.n = n
def __iter__(self):
return itertools.product(self.reit, repeat=self.n)
def __contains__(self, seq):
if len(seq) != self.n:
return False
for i, item in enumerate(it):
if item not in self.reit:
return False
return True
--
Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Nested loops is strangely slow, totally at a loss. Shiyao Ma <i@introo.me> - 2014-12-10 13:20 +0800
Re: Nested loops is strangely slow, totally at a loss. Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-12-10 06:44 +0000
Re: Nested loops is strangely slow, totally at a loss. Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-12-10 17:53 +1100
Re: Nested loops is strangely slow, totally at a loss. Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-12-10 07:21 +0000
Re: Nested loops is strangely slow, totally at a loss. Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-12-10 02:16 -0500
csiph-web