Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'method.': 0.07; 'exist,': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'def': 0.12; 'jan': 0.12; '"in"': 0.16; 'does,': 0.16; 'iterator,': 0.16; 'iterators': 0.16; 'itertools': 0.16; 'objects.': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'stuff.': 0.16; 'subject:slow': 0.16; 'think.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'wed,': 0.18; 'tests': 0.22; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'dec': 0.30; 'membership': 0.31; "d'aprano": 0.31; 'steven': 0.31; 'class': 0.32; 'skip:_ 10': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'objects': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'building': 0.35; 'false': 0.36; 'possible': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'range': 0.61; 'specialized': 0.65; "it'd": 0.84; 'n):': 0.84; 'received:fios.verizon.net': 0.84; 'self.n': 0.84; 'received:108': 0.93 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Terry Reedy Subject: Re: Nested loops is strangely slow, totally at a loss. Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 02:16:37 -0500 References: <5487ebc7$0$2817$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-108-16-203-145.phlapa.fios.verizon.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 32 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1418195822 news.xs4all.nl 2889 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57426 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:82268 On 12/10/2014 1:53 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> It would be nice if product iterators behaved like xrange() objects and >> could perform "in" tests without exhausting the iterator, but they don't. >> That's sad. > > It'd be very difficult to do that in the general sense. But it should > be possible to have a multi-dimensional range object that behaves the > way Py3's range object does, including membership tests and stuff. > (Might already exist, for all I know.) That would do what the OP > wants, I think. Itertools are general tools for building specialized objects. itertools.product provides the iter method. class ReitProd(): # untested def __init__(self, reiterable, n): self.reit = reiterable # must support 'in' self.n = n def __iter__(self): return itertools.product(self.reit, repeat=self.n) def __contains__(self, seq): if len(seq) != self.n: return False for i, item in enumerate(it): if item not in self.reit: return False return True -- Terry Jan Reedy