Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " name == 'main' "?

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.etla.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<skip.montanaro@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.024
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.95; 'S': 0.00; 'exit': 0.09; 'happen.': 0.09; 'subject:How': 0.10; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'unlikely': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'module': 0.19; 'thu,': 0.19; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'documented': 0.24; 'skip': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'order.': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'change,': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'getting': 0.31; '13,': 0.31; 'subject:some': 0.31; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'nov': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'called': 0.40; 'ian': 0.60; 'to:addr:gmail.com': 0.65; 'reverse': 0.68; 'behavior': 0.77
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=MUSoAHkLJfyMTi/3Mg2wyJrEvN6A1wC06hUayBSRhdg=; b=yrGeaFDOLznMO0PVwl7+8UqZUBHf+i6tPYfKyHQavH8UTYgy1mB7CHx0frgtIOrzPx npJEe/YIBrHWxazjfJBLYzTI9b/aSCkE9T2gG3u6fq2yG5BiWfIANRGIuOlY/HWCRh7l t6R8ccBnGmDFf5u/D9Gh3eKmXNyNi5+F4ZlIdwzdY35moszb1z+DTXj9uOE/R59RsYXq lAjANboMyPwogEwtMh1fhQIdlIWzYYIRkXmXDntS1/rkmFFzuCdumGdBw3wEjxcskleN Dk8JRIA4CQPB1iCk6/+sAcUHsU+p0Qoi6ji2u1oobdWtv133GNPhh8wPRSd6gHvvfZWV jarQ==
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Received	by 10.43.129.134 with SMTP id hi6mr7183092icc.62.1415911471050; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:44:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To	<CALwzid=uiDQrn7PSUrD=U-u-4shXexwCGb9bgCueYdtC0uEjeg@mail.gmail.com>
References	<71b9a111-283f-4006-bc9d-e35782d9888c@googlegroups.com> <CAPM-O+yukMKq8m1Udcw23=kgPc6zvncfS1ohPcyme_4RXMTATg@mail.gmail.com> <CALvWhxuo8EB_FqkeUXe9nRj1CGFxrVtzw76afc21cB5=D4aZwg@mail.gmail.com> <CALwzid=i6vKUnQU1pfO3qs8H5u+_J4ff_XdkQUxt4ajN5JNYfQ@mail.gmail.com> <5464F958.4070404@stoneleaf.us> <CALwzid=uiDQrn7PSUrD=U-u-4shXexwCGb9bgCueYdtC0uEjeg@mail.gmail.com>
Date	Thu, 13 Nov 2014 14:44:30 -0600
Subject	Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "?
From	Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com>
To	Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc	Python <python-list@python.org>
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.15788.1415911479.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	11
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1415911479 news.xs4all.nl 2953 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:58180
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:80702

Show key headers only | View raw

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote:
> ... other things decorated with atexit.register
> might actually be called before the main function

I don't think that will happen. The atexit module is documented to
execute its exit functions in reverse order. What's not documented is
the behavior of calling atexit.register() while atexit._run_exitfuncs
is running. That's an implementation detail, and though unlikely to
change, it might be worthwhile getting that behavior documented.

Skip

Thread

How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-11-12 13:02 -0800
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Joel Goldstick <joel.goldstick@gmail.com> - 2014-11-12 16:07 -0500
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-11-12 13:17 -0800
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-11-12 13:19 -0800
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Chris Kaynor <ckaynor@zindagigames.com> - 2014-11-12 13:33 -0800
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-11-12 23:52 +0200
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-11-12 14:51 -0700
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com> - 2014-11-12 15:55 -0600
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Chris Kaynor <ckaynor@zindagigames.com> - 2014-11-12 14:09 -0800
    Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-11-15 22:09 +1100
      Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-11-15 13:54 +0200
      Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Vito De Tullio <vito.detullio@gmail.com> - 2014-11-16 11:26 +0100
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-11-12 15:19 -0700
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-11-12 18:19 -0500
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-11-13 10:26 +1100
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-11-12 19:35 -0500
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-11-13 11:54 +1100
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-11-13 10:32 -0800
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-11-13 13:33 -0700
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-11-13 12:43 -0800
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com> - 2014-11-13 14:44 -0600
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com> - 2014-11-13 14:53 -0600
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-11-13 15:48 -0700
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-11-13 15:56 -0700
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-11-15 21:52 +1100
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Vito De Tullio <vito.detullio@gmail.com> - 2014-11-16 11:39 +0100
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-11-16 10:15 -0700
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-12-01 15:19 -0800
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-12-01 16:45 -0800
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-12-02 12:15 +1100
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-12-02 02:17 -0800

csiph-web