Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #80644

Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "?

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!dedibox.gegeweb.org!gegeweb.eu!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.020
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; '"__main__":': 0.09; '__name__': 0.09; 'main()': 0.09; 'subject:How': 0.10; 'def': 0.12; 'blocks': 0.16; 'function?': 0.16; 'redundant': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'wed,': 0.18; 'replacing': 0.19; 'this:': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'chris': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'along': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'lines': 0.31; 'proposing': 0.31; 'subject:some': 0.31; 'another': 0.32; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'nov': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; '12,': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'called': 0.40; 'simple': 0.61; "you're": 0.61; 'here': 0.66; 'goal': 0.75
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=cJxI5TrXnaccyRGxcjIj9H7P8WKqAAdzJvpJrCwlO6Q=; b=ZRgG5KY48BeLLHU+sgreBOVBGe+tnlL+l2SS/7Wy9O9kkvIcsdEr54+ugcOrT5J+XN Wd1UKeZ5FzqkDYHQQUHc2CYTLn/P4ngzO28PKKyytRPGVlHPMfLoSJUzjJvnajAtY+Rw ZGi/rwqvbNYcF5INNwBkHrwnMmOH+9IuLIRH4W0AAmxZOVa/7cDWK8m4xhHWiDMXCG6p z36HZwLFmYizAhoZ6LT3UX+rksLRQMW7fryh9xipmaKvFOdGG7eM+XO/UPJR7gKKYHoy aTKkj20Gf8VC7F1IeKi8oA1e453/VQZvxKv3FIQM2wLZyRIX0yAr1UoIgswuCxrp4NpT HE3A==
X-Received by 10.69.31.138 with SMTP id km10mr51674453pbd.6.1415830790007; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 14:19:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <CALvWhxujvtpo_KHxhvcRtKaYhkZaPwvtpNRsq4vRFet3wwwx9A@mail.gmail.com>
References <71b9a111-283f-4006-bc9d-e35782d9888c@googlegroups.com> <CAPM-O+yukMKq8m1Udcw23=kgPc6zvncfS1ohPcyme_4RXMTATg@mail.gmail.com> <CALvWhxuo8EB_FqkeUXe9nRj1CGFxrVtzw76afc21cB5=D4aZwg@mail.gmail.com> <CALwzid=i6vKUnQU1pfO3qs8H5u+_J4ff_XdkQUxt4ajN5JNYfQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALvWhxujvtpo_KHxhvcRtKaYhkZaPwvtpNRsq4vRFet3wwwx9A@mail.gmail.com>
From Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:19:09 -0700
Subject Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "?
To Python <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.15749.1415830799.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 33
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1415830799 news.xs4all.nl 2908 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:33821
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:80644

Show key headers only | View raw

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Chris Kaynor <ckaynor@zindagigames.com> wrote:
> I was thinking along the lines of replacing:
>
> if __name__ == "__main__":
>     <<<block of code>>>
>
> with
>
> @main
> def myFunction()
>     <<<<block of code>>
>
> Both blocks of code will be called at the same time.

99% of the time the content of <<<block of code>>> is just "main()",
so then you're proposing replacing this:

if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()

with this:

@main
def myFunction():
    my_main()

Which feels redundant to me. Why have a function here that does
nothing but call another function?

I think if this is the goal then a simple predicate would be clearer:

if is_main_module():
    main()

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-11-12 13:02 -0800
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Joel Goldstick <joel.goldstick@gmail.com> - 2014-11-12 16:07 -0500
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-11-12 13:17 -0800
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-11-12 13:19 -0800
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Chris Kaynor <ckaynor@zindagigames.com> - 2014-11-12 13:33 -0800
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-11-12 23:52 +0200
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-11-12 14:51 -0700
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com> - 2014-11-12 15:55 -0600
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Chris Kaynor <ckaynor@zindagigames.com> - 2014-11-12 14:09 -0800
    Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-11-15 22:09 +1100
      Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-11-15 13:54 +0200
      Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Vito De Tullio <vito.detullio@gmail.com> - 2014-11-16 11:26 +0100
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-11-12 15:19 -0700
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-11-12 18:19 -0500
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-11-13 10:26 +1100
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-11-12 19:35 -0500
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-11-13 11:54 +1100
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-11-13 10:32 -0800
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-11-13 13:33 -0700
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-11-13 12:43 -0800
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com> - 2014-11-13 14:44 -0600
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com> - 2014-11-13 14:53 -0600
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-11-13 15:48 -0700
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-11-13 15:56 -0700
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-11-15 21:52 +1100
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Vito De Tullio <vito.detullio@gmail.com> - 2014-11-16 11:39 +0100
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-11-16 10:15 -0700
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-12-01 15:19 -0800
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-12-01 16:45 -0800
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-12-02 12:15 +1100
  Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-12-02 02:17 -0800

csiph-web