Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #80581
| From | Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Combining lists to dictionary |
| Date | 2014-11-12 12:16 +1100 |
| References | <m3tscl$f1e$2@dont-email.me> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.15704.1415755032.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi
>
> Given x,y are a lists of keys and value that I wish to combine to a
> dictionary, such that x[n] is the key for value y[n], which is preferred:
>
> z = {a:b for (a,b) in zip(x,y)}
This one, with the caveat to use PEP-8 compatible formatting::
z = {a: b for (a, b) in zip(x, y)}
> z = {x[n]:y[n] for n in range(min(len(x),len(y)))}
Too much indirection for no gain that I can see.
> The zip feels more elegant, but it seems clunky to use the zip method to
> create a list of tuples just to split them up into key:value pairs.
I think ‘zip’ has this as a primary intended purpose, so it seems fine
to me.
--
\ “Of all classes the rich are the most noticed and the least |
`\ studied.” —John Kenneth Galbraith, _The Age of Uncertainty_, |
_o__) 1977 |
Ben Finney
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Combining lists to dictionary Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2014-11-11 20:43 +0000 Re: Combining lists to dictionary Gary Herron <gherron@digipen.edu> - 2014-11-11 12:55 -0800 Re: Combining lists to dictionary Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@technologyhighland.invalid> - 2014-11-11 13:42 -0800 Re: Combining lists to dictionary Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-11-11 20:06 -0500 Re: Combining lists to dictionary Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-11-12 12:16 +1100 Re: Combining lists to dictionary Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-11-12 01:13 -0500
csiph-web