Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #80335
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <wrw@mac.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.064 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.87; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:: [': 0.04; 'subject:code': 0.07; 'yeah,': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'clayton': 0.16; 'received:mac.com': 0.16; 'subject:programming': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'received:10.0.1': 0.19; 'subject:] ': 0.20; 'machine': 0.22; 'memory': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'cc:2**1': 0.23; 'days,': 0.24; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'subject:that': 0.31; 'checked': 0.32; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'but': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'done': 0.36; "didn't": 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'received:10.0': 0.36; 'received:10': 0.37; 'nov': 0.38; 'received:17': 0.38; 'somebody': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'subject:can': 0.39; 'users': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'tell': 0.60; 'times': 0.62; '2014,': 0.84; 'amazed': 0.84; 'compiling': 0.84; 'header:In-reply-to:1': 0.84; 'whopping': 0.84; 'subject:you': 0.87; 'subject:OFF': 0.95 |
| X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version | vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52,1.0.28,0.0.0000 definitions=2014-11-06_05:2014-11-06,2014-11-06,1970-01-01 signatures=0 |
| X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details | rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1408290000 definitions=main-1411060112 |
| Content-type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| MIME-version | 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\)) |
| Subject | Re: [OFF-TOPIC] It is true that is impossible write in binary code, the lowest level of programming that you can write is in hex code? |
| From | William Ray Wing <wrw@mac.com> |
| In-reply-to | <022e01cff94e$44637dd0$cd2a7970$@us> |
| Date | Thu, 06 Nov 2014 09:19:10 -0500 |
| Content-transfer-encoding | quoted-printable |
| References | <m3dg91$dhn$3@dont-email.me> <20141105222735.GA51461@cskk.homeip.net> <022e01cff94e$44637dd0$cd2a7970$@us> |
| To | crk@godblessthe.us |
| X-Mailer | Apple Mail (2.1990.1) |
| Cc | python-list@python.org, "William R. Wing" <wrw@mac.com> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.15547.1415287166.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 23 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1415287166 news.xs4all.nl 2951 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57582 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:80335 |
Show key headers only | View raw
> On Nov 5, 2014, at 6:14 PM, Clayton Kirkwood <crk@godblessthe.us> wrote: > > Yeah, the 11 was mesmerizing. You didn't need no stinkin' program to see how > busy the system was, you just checked the lights. You could really tell when > somebody was compiling or link/loading. As I've done many times since those > days, I am amazed how many users could be using the system simultaneously > (yes, general editing, but still...) and it wasn't a quick machine by any > stretch. We had a whopping 384K memory and big multi-platter disks with a > whopping 65MB. Still think in terms of PIP sometimes… > And TECO. . . > Clayton
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [OFF-TOPIC] It is true that is impossible write in binary code, the lowest level of programming that you can write is in hex code? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2014-11-04 21:30 -0500
Re: [OFF-TOPIC] It is true that is impossible write in binary code, the lowest level of programming that you can write is in hex code? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-11-05 15:05 +0000
Re: [OFF-TOPIC] It is true that is impossible write in binary code, the lowest level of programming that you can write is in hex code? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-11-06 02:21 +1100
Re: [OFF-TOPIC] It is true that is impossible write in binary code, the lowest level of programming that you can write is in hex code? Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2014-11-05 15:38 +0000
Re: [OFF-TOPIC] It is true that is impossible write in binary code, the lowest level of programming that you can write is in hex code? Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2014-11-06 09:27 +1100
Re: [OFF-TOPIC] It is true that is impossible write in binary code, the lowest level of programming that you can write is in hex code? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2014-11-05 22:33 -0500
RE: [OFF-TOPIC] It is true that is impossible write in binary code, the lowest level of programming that you can write is in hex code? "Clayton Kirkwood" <crk@godblessthe.us> - 2014-11-05 15:14 -0800
Re: [OFF-TOPIC] It is true that is impossible write in binary code, the lowest level of programming that you can write is in hex code? William Ray Wing <wrw@mac.com> - 2014-11-06 09:19 -0500
csiph-web