Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <wrw@mac.com>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.064
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.87; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:: [': 0.04; 'subject:code': 0.07; 'yeah,': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'clayton': 0.16; 'received:mac.com': 0.16; 'subject:programming': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'received:10.0.1': 0.19; 'subject:] ': 0.20; 'machine': 0.22; 'memory': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'cc:2**1': 0.23; 'days,': 0.24; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'subject:that': 0.31; 'checked': 0.32; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'but': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'done': 0.36; "didn't": 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'received:10.0': 0.36; 'received:10': 0.37; 'nov': 0.38; 'received:17': 0.38; 'somebody': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'subject:can': 0.39; 'users': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'tell': 0.60; 'times': 0.62; '2014,': 0.84; 'amazed': 0.84; 'compiling': 0.84; 'header:In-reply-to:1': 0.84; 'whopping': 0.84; 'subject:you': 0.87; 'subject:OFF': 0.95
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52,1.0.28,0.0.0000 definitions=2014-11-06_05:2014-11-06,2014-11-06,1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1408290000 definitions=main-1411060112
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
Subject: Re: [OFF-TOPIC] It is true that is impossible write in binary code, the lowest level of programming that you can write is in hex code?
From: William Ray Wing <wrw@mac.com>
In-reply-to: <022e01cff94e$44637dd0$cd2a7970$@us>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 09:19:10 -0500
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
References: <m3dg91$dhn$3@dont-email.me> <20141105222735.GA51461@cskk.homeip.net> <022e01cff94e$44637dd0$cd2a7970$@us>
To: crk@godblessthe.us
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1)
Cc: python-list@python.org, "William R. Wing" <wrw@mac.com>
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.15547.1415287166.18130.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 23
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1415287166 news.xs4all.nl 2951 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57582
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:80335


> On Nov 5, 2014, at 6:14 PM, Clayton Kirkwood <crk@godblessthe.us> =
wrote:
>=20
> Yeah, the 11 was mesmerizing. You didn't need no stinkin' program to =
see how
> busy the system was, you just checked the lights. You could really =
tell when
> somebody was compiling or link/loading. As I've done many times since =
those
> days, I am amazed how many users could be using the system =
simultaneously
> (yes, general editing, but still...) and it wasn't a quick machine by =
any
> stretch. We had a whopping 384K memory and big multi-platter disks =
with a
> whopping 65MB. Still think in terms of PIP sometimes=E2=80=A6
>=20

And TECO. . .

> Clayton