Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #79907

Re: Python Style Question

From Martin Kemp <martin.kemp@ingg.com>
Subject Re: Python Style Question
Date 2014-10-29 11:25 +0000
References <406463d0-1287-49a2-b1ed-08a928db4b94@googlegroups.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.15294.1414582983.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 29/10/2014 10:45, Anton wrote:
> Let's say I have an incoming list of values *l*. Every element of
> *l* can be one of the following options: 1) an integer value 2) a
> string in form of '<int_value>', e.g. '7' 3) a string with a json
> serialization of an integer value, e.g. '"7"' 4) something else
> that should be ignored
> 
> I need to transform this list into another list with values from
> options 1)-3) coerced to int. The code below should do this.
> 
> 
> Variant 1 ===
> 
> values = [] for c in l: # Case 1) or 2) try: c_int = int(c) except
> ValueError: pass else: values.add(c_int) continue
> 
> # Case 3) try: c_int = int(json.loads(c)) except ValueError: pass 
> else: values.add(c_int) continue
> 
> ===
> 
> Is this code ugly? Does it follow EAFP? Am I missing something in
> language best practice?
> 
> Or maybe below is more preferable way with a nested try...except
> clause?
> 
> Variant 2 === values = [] for c in l: # Case 1) or 2) try: c_int =
> int(c) except ValueError:  # Case 3) try: c_int =
> int(json.loads(c)) except ValueError: pass else: values.add(c_int) 
> continue  else: values.add(c_int) continue ===
> 
> Thanks, Anton.
> 
> 

Your first example is perfectly fine and is EAFP

Personally, I prefer to avoid nesting when it's not necessary.

- -- 
Martin Kemp (martin.kemp@ingg.com)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUUM7zAAoJEJ0Re0UIDzSucugIALn/zY8RdpP8iaMShHoszzqf
I0zl0mFHyqhNtwgQ0ZF7VGO+H+U0Dk8rhzTYOmEMzPTKNBGwll3fda9mOnrK9Xvp
9gQjII6DyQIWH7Z3dLcLr2e1j8OMNUSL6UmAYs8urNSIKZLowdV3JI4G/bLyW0KS
y5Ko8dI6y5nOJ1P9XCmPTmags43UZfR8DrBUaAbzNcS8FGwmUE2KBkEhLQOvmpJi
jmMc7wMOpq0jL+XbA+7pHUqoVZ7w1tUFjuy9I3h45tgPuTFAFB0gX+FpE+oVgO5o
spQpVaOPEYN9ceLgHdKSxzdVIhOQLE6H/SYNHlsEW/ZNM6aR9n4yipgkOmtJ0+M=
=WzHA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Python Style Question Anton <anton.schattenfeld@gmail.com> - 2014-10-29 03:42 -0700
  Re: Python Style Question Martin Kemp <martin.kemp@ingg.com> - 2014-10-29 11:25 +0000
  Re: Python Style Question Rafael Romero Carmona <rafaelromcar@gmail.com> - 2014-10-29 12:09 +0100
    Re: Python Style Question Anton <anton.schattenfeld@gmail.com> - 2014-10-29 12:09 -0700
  Re: Python Style Question Rafael Romero Carmona <rafaelromcar@gmail.com> - 2014-10-29 12:52 +0100
    Re: Python Style Question Anton <anton.schattenfeld@gmail.com> - 2014-10-29 12:23 -0700
  Re: Python Style Question Martin Kemp <martin.kemp@ingg.com> - 2014-10-29 12:42 +0000
  Re: Python Style Question Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-10-30 22:10 +1100
    Re: Python Style Question MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2014-10-30 12:21 +0000
      Re: Python Style Question Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-10-31 09:48 +1100
        Re: Python Style Question Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2014-10-31 04:55 +0000
    Re: Python Style Question Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-10-30 20:34 -0400
      Re: Python Style Question Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-10-31 14:52 +1100
    Re: Python Style Question Anton <anton.schattenfeld@gmail.com> - 2014-11-12 12:31 -0800

csiph-web