Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #198022
| From | ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: ( n & -n ).bit_length() - 1 ## Really? |
| Date | 2026-09-19 18:23 +0000 |
| Organization | Stefan Ram |
| Message-ID | <bits-20260919192308@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> (permalink) |
| References | <X0ArS.155893$NMu2.109571@fx15.ams4> |
"Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> wrote or quoted: >The above formula seems to work, given a few spot checks, but I thought >this should be a utility function in the underlying multiprecision lib- >rary in Python. Is the calculation n & -n really necessary? While "n & -n" might take some time for large Python integers, I see no way to do it faster in Python. In C, one might be able to access the segments of large numbers (the "limbs") starting with the least significant one to shortcut the operation as soon as a "1" is found.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
( n & -n ).bit_length() - 1 ## Really? "Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-20 01:56 +0800
Re: ( n & -n ).bit_length() - 1 ## Really? ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2026-09-19 18:23 +0000
Re: ( n & -n ).bit_length() - 1 ## Really? "Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-20 03:15 +0800
Re: ( n & -n ).bit_length() - 1 ## Really? Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-09-19 13:37 -0600
Re: ( n & -n ).bit_length() - 1 ## Really? "Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-20 04:32 +0800
Re: ( n & -n ).bit_length() - 1 ## Really? ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2026-09-19 20:39 +0000
Re: ( n & -n ).bit_length() - 1 ## Really? "Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-20 04:56 +0800
myrkraverk.c (was: Re: ( n & -n ).bit_length() - 1 ## Really?) "Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-20 18:00 +0800
Re: myrkraverk.c ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2026-09-20 12:25 +0000
Re: myrkraverk.c "Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-20 21:33 +0800
Re: myrkraverk.c ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2026-09-20 13:48 +0000
Re: myrkraverk.c "Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-20 22:09 +0800
jacobi_symbol.py (was: Re: myrkraverk.c) Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-21 20:34 +0800
Re: jacobi_symbol.py Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-22 15:20 +0800
Re: jacobi_symbol.py Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-25 23:32 +0800
Re: ( n & -n ).bit_length() - 1 ## Really? "Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-20 04:52 +0800
Re: ( n & -n ).bit_length() - 1 ## Really? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2026-09-19 14:50 -0700
csiph-web