Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #2186
| From | Carlos <angus@quovadis.com.ar> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.postscript |
| Subject | Re: Is 'mark ... /ANN pdfmark' allowed? |
| Date | 2015-02-23 16:45 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <mcfhta$4c4$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <3f0b8802-d9fb-430d-a024-9cf1d60c3ae4@googlegroups.com> |
On 23/02/2015 16:00, jdaw1 wrote: > My PostScript code has multiple instances of > mark ... /ANN pdfmark > > I've just learnt that if Adobe Distiller is set to PDF/X-3:2002 (rather than my usual 'High Quality Print'), that fails. Ouch! > >> <PDFX ISO="15930-3:2002" COMPLIANT="false"> ... [Violation] Annotations were found inside the BleedBox, TrimBox, or ArtBox on the following pages: ... This document does not pass PDF/X-3:2002 compliance checks. > > Is there any way to detect within the PostScript if pdfmark /ANN is allowed? So that the PostScript will do it if it won't cause a failure, and won't if it will? > You can use currentdistillerparams and check the adequate parameter (probably /CheckCompliance or /PDFX3Check). Here is a reference: http://www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/devnet/acrobat/pdfs/distillerparameters.pdf --
Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is 'mark ... /ANN pdfmark' allowed? jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2015-02-23 07:00 -0800
Re: Is 'mark ... /ANN pdfmark' allowed? Carlos <angus@quovadis.com.ar> - 2015-02-23 16:45 +0100
Re: Is 'mark ... /ANN pdfmark' allowed? jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2015-02-23 13:05 -0800
csiph-web