Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #1310

Re: 'eofill'ing areas

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!nuzba.szn.dk!pnx.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Helge Blischke <h.blischke@acm.org>
Newsgroups comp.lang.postscript
Subject Re: 'eofill'ing areas
Followup-To comp.lang.postscript
Date Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:02:31 +0100
Lines 25
Message-ID <aq6h17FciaaU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <aq418tFpv7gU1@mid.individual.net> <aq4bsuFseg3U3@mid.individual.net> <aq6figFc882U1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7Bit
X-Trace individual.net 98T80VidCk3nkwLUhQuJVAFMTGXRyVi8WTq+ZH00LSDdX7/XNZfEhNyrK9LICpn/9X
Cancel-Lock sha1:EGYyWjzNAamAz0jAjl+JisfinW0=
User-Agent KNode/0.99.01
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.postscript:1310

Followups directed to: comp.lang.postscript

Show key headers only | View raw


Michael Unger wrote:

> On 2013-03-10 22:22, "Helge Blischke" wrote:
> 
>> No idea what is going wrong with Distiller. I fed the file through
>> Ghostscript (version 9.07) (only appended a showpage to the end), and the
>> result seems OK.
>> Perhaps the missing showpage is the culprit.
> 
> No, it isn't; it doesn't make any difference at all whether there is a
> "showpage" command in the PostScript code.
> 
> Another observation: It also doesn't make a difference if the font is
> just referenced (as shown in the example) or embedded (as a PostScript
> level 3 font dictionary).
> 
> Rather strange ...
> 
> Michael
> 

Dies the Acrobat 6 distiller emit any log messages?

Helge

Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

'eofill'ing areas Michael Unger <spam.to.unger@spamgourmet.com> - 2013-03-10 18:46 +0100
  Re: 'eofill'ing areas Helge Blischke <h.blischke@acm.org> - 2013-03-10 22:22 +0100
    Re: 'eofill'ing areas Michael Unger <spam.to.unger@spamgourmet.com> - 2013-03-11 17:31 +0100
      Re: 'eofill'ing areas Helge Blischke <h.blischke@acm.org> - 2013-03-11 18:02 +0100
        Re: 'eofill'ing areas Michael Unger <spam.to.unger@spamgourmet.com> - 2013-03-12 18:45 +0100
          Re: 'eofill'ing areas Helge Blischke <h.blischke@acm.org> - 2013-03-13 11:59 +0100
            Re: 'eofill'ing areas Michael Unger <spam.to.unger@spamgourmet.com> - 2013-03-13 18:00 +0100
              Re: 'eofill'ing areas Helge Blischke <h.blischke@acm.org> - 2013-03-13 18:20 +0100
                Re: 'eofill'ing areas Olle <olavi.sakari@gmail.com> - 2013-03-19 00:25 -0700
                Re: 'eofill'ing areas Olle <olavi.sakari@gmail.com> - 2013-03-19 00:31 -0700
                Re: 'eofill'ing areas luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2013-03-20 13:28 -0700
                Re: 'eofill'ing areas Michael Unger <spam.to.unger@spamgourmet.com> - 2013-03-21 17:30 +0100
                Re: 'eofill'ing areas Helge Blischke <h.blischke@acm.org> - 2013-03-21 17:52 +0100
  Re: 'eofill'ing areas luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2013-03-10 18:48 -0700

csiph-web