Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.php > #4365 > unrolled thread
| Started by | srikanth <sritullimilli@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-01-09 07:23 -0800 |
| Last post | 2012-01-11 15:51 +0100 |
| Articles | 7 on this page of 27 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.php
this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script srikanth <sritullimilli@gmail.com> - 2012-01-09 07:23 -0800
Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script Captain Paralytic <paul_lautman@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-09 07:37 -0800
Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script Erwin Moller <erwinmollerusenet@xs4all.nl> - 2012-01-09 17:25 +0100
Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-09 17:35 +0000
Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-09 19:48 +0100
Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-09 19:33 +0000
Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-09 21:20 +0100
Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-09 20:38 +0000
Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-09 21:53 +0100
Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script Luuk <Luuk@invalid.lan> - 2012-01-09 23:04 +0100
Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-09 23:08 +0100
ommiting closeing tag in PHP [Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script] Luuk <Luuk@invalid.lan> - 2012-01-10 11:58 +0100
Re: ommiting closeing tag in PHP [Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script] Captain Paralytic <paul_lautman@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-10 03:15 -0800
Re: ommiting closeing tag in PHP [Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script] The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-10 12:34 +0000
Re: ommiting closeing tag in PHP [Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script] Captain Paralytic <paul_lautman@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-10 05:24 -0800
Re: ommiting closeing tag in PHP [Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script] The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-10 12:33 +0000
Re: ommiting closeing tag in PHP [Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script] Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-10 07:54 -0500
Re: ommiting closeing tag in PHP [Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script] "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-10 17:16 +0100
Re: ommiting closeing tag in PHP [Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script] Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-10 14:56 -0500
Re: ommiting closeing tag in PHP [Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script] "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-10 22:08 +0100
Re: ommiting closeing tag in PHP [Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script] The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-10 21:11 +0000
Re: ommiting closeing tag in PHP [Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script] Richard <rgrdev_@gmail.com> - 2012-01-10 22:23 +0100
Re: ommiting closeing tag in PHP [Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script] The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-10 21:31 +0000
Re: ommiting closeing tag in PHP [Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script] "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-10 22:45 +0100
Re: ommiting closeing tag in PHP [Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script] Luuk <Luuk@invalid.lan> - 2012-01-10 23:02 +0100
Re: ommiting closeing tag in PHP Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-16 01:30 +0100
Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-01-11 15:51 +0100
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-01-10 21:11 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: ommiting closeing tag in PHP [Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script] |
| Message-ID | <jei9ha$pcu$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #4405 |
M. Strobel wrote: > Am 10.01.2012 20:56, schrieb Jerry Stuckle: >> On 1/10/2012 11:16 AM, M. Strobel wrote: >>> Am 10.01.2012 13:54, schrieb Jerry Stuckle: >>>> On 1/10/2012 7:33 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>> Luuk wrote: >>>>>> On 09-01-2012 23:08, M. Strobel wrote: >>>>>>> Am 09.01.2012 23:04, schrieb Luuk: >>>>>>>> On 09-01-2012 21:53, M. Strobel wrote: >>>>>>>>> Just omit the closing tag in php-only files, it's easier >>>>>>>>> than the >>>>>>>>> ob_ functions. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> /Str. >>>>>>>> If you re-checked, could you also provide us with a link to >>>>>>>> where you >>>>>>>> found that info? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> search string was php closing tag >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.basic-syntax.instruction-separation.php >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /Str. >>>>>> damn, they actually documented this UGLY feature ;) >>>>>> >>>>> Ugly, but damed usefull as my editor has a habit of adding an >>>>> extra >>>>> newline to the end of text files. >>>>> >>>> So get a good editor. >>>> >>> Now why should he "get a good editor" if he can omit the >>> closing tag? >>> >>> /Str. >> Because leaving off the close tag can cause problems later when >> someone else edits the site, assuming close tags are there. >> >> And leaving off a closing tag to get round an editor problem is >> just plain sloppy programming. But we already know certain >> people here don't care about that. >> > He has no editor problem, he can leave the closing tag off. Don't > send him off in a goose chase. > > I knew who would not be comfortable with this easy solution. > Only because (a) he didn't know it and (b) I said it was useful. NOTHING is easier than typing a ?> and then following it with a carriage return.. > /Str.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard <rgrdev_@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-01-10 22:23 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: ommiting closeing tag in PHP [Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script] |
| Message-ID | <qjmx9vfe0y.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #4406 |
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes: > M. Strobel wrote: >> Am 10.01.2012 20:56, schrieb Jerry Stuckle: >>> On 1/10/2012 11:16 AM, M. Strobel wrote: >>>> Am 10.01.2012 13:54, schrieb Jerry Stuckle: >>>>> On 1/10/2012 7:33 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>>> Luuk wrote: >>>>>>> On 09-01-2012 23:08, M. Strobel wrote: >>>>>>>> Am 09.01.2012 23:04, schrieb Luuk: >>>>>>>>> On 09-01-2012 21:53, M. Strobel wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Just omit the closing tag in php-only files, it's easier >>>>>>>>>> than the >>>>>>>>>> ob_ functions. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> /Str. >>>>>>>>> If you re-checked, could you also provide us with a link to >>>>>>>>> where you >>>>>>>>> found that info? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> search string was php closing tag >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.basic-syntax.instruction-separation.php >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> /Str. >>>>>>> damn, they actually documented this UGLY feature ;) >>>>>>> >>>>>> Ugly, but damed usefull as my editor has a habit of adding an >>>>>> extra >>>>>> newline to the end of text files. >>>>>> >>>>> So get a good editor. >>>>> >>>> Now why should he "get a good editor" if he can omit the >>>> closing tag? >>>> >>>> /Str. >>> Because leaving off the close tag can cause problems later when >>> someone else edits the site, assuming close tags are there. >>> >>> And leaving off a closing tag to get round an editor problem is >>> just plain sloppy programming. But we already know certain >>> people here don't care about that. >>> >> He has no editor problem, he can leave the closing tag off. Don't >> send him off in a goose chase. >> >> I knew who would not be comfortable with this easy solution. >> > Only because > > (a) he didn't know it > and > (b) I said it was useful. > > NOTHING is easier than typing a ?> and then following it with a carriage > return.. How horrible. Are people really suggesting this hard to spot (when you dont know it) hack as a way to develop code? Leaving off closing tags?!?!?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-01-10 21:31 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: ommiting closeing tag in PHP [Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script] |
| Message-ID | <jeiamm$si7$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #4407 |
Richard wrote: > The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes: > >> M. Strobel wrote: >>> Am 10.01.2012 20:56, schrieb Jerry Stuckle: >>>> On 1/10/2012 11:16 AM, M. Strobel wrote: >>>>> Am 10.01.2012 13:54, schrieb Jerry Stuckle: >>>>>> On 1/10/2012 7:33 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>>>> Luuk wrote: >>>>>>>> On 09-01-2012 23:08, M. Strobel wrote: >>>>>>>>> Am 09.01.2012 23:04, schrieb Luuk: >>>>>>>>>> On 09-01-2012 21:53, M. Strobel wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Just omit the closing tag in php-only files, it's easier >>>>>>>>>>> than the >>>>>>>>>>> ob_ functions. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> /Str. >>>>>>>>>> If you re-checked, could you also provide us with a link to >>>>>>>>>> where you >>>>>>>>>> found that info? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> search string was php closing tag >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.basic-syntax.instruction-separation.php >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> /Str. >>>>>>>> damn, they actually documented this UGLY feature ;) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ugly, but damed usefull as my editor has a habit of adding an >>>>>>> extra >>>>>>> newline to the end of text files. >>>>>>> >>>>>> So get a good editor. >>>>>> >>>>> Now why should he "get a good editor" if he can omit the >>>>> closing tag? >>>>> >>>>> /Str. >>>> Because leaving off the close tag can cause problems later when >>>> someone else edits the site, assuming close tags are there. >>>> >>>> And leaving off a closing tag to get round an editor problem is >>>> just plain sloppy programming. But we already know certain >>>> people here don't care about that. >>>> >>> He has no editor problem, he can leave the closing tag off. Don't >>> send him off in a goose chase. >>> >>> I knew who would not be comfortable with this easy solution. >>> >> Only because >> >> (a) he didn't know it >> and >> (b) I said it was useful. >> >> NOTHING is easier than typing a ?> and then following it with a carriage >> return.. > > How horrible. Are people really suggesting this hard to spot (when you > dont know it) hack as a way to develop code? Leaving off closing > tags?!?!? It's not a 'closing tag' : its a switch to tell php to drop back into 'spit out the source file raw' mode. If you don't ever want it to do that...it seems a valid reasonable and apparently valid-in-terms-of-the-language-as-specified way to do it. If the spec says its intrinsic to the language, a feature, it can't be a hack can it? How many people add semicolons to the last line of a CSS style block definition?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-01-10 22:45 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: ommiting closeing tag in PHP [Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script] |
| Message-ID | <9n3pskFqgrU1@mid.uni-berlin.de> |
| In reply to | #4408 |
Am 10.01.2012 22:31, schrieb The Natural Philosopher: > Richard wrote: >> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes: >> >>> M. Strobel wrote: >>>> Am 10.01.2012 20:56, schrieb Jerry Stuckle: >>>>> On 1/10/2012 11:16 AM, M. Strobel wrote: >>>>>> Am 10.01.2012 13:54, schrieb Jerry Stuckle: >>>>>>> On 1/10/2012 7:33 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>>>>> Luuk wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 09-01-2012 23:08, M. Strobel wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Am 09.01.2012 23:04, schrieb Luuk: >>>>>>>>>>> On 09-01-2012 21:53, M. Strobel wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Just omit the closing tag in php-only files, it's easier >>>>>>>>>>>> than the >>>>>>>>>>>> ob_ functions. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> /Str. ---cut >>>>>>>>>> /Str. >>>>>>>>> damn, they actually documented this UGLY feature ;) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ugly, but damed usefull as my editor has a habit of >>>>>>>> adding an >>>>>>>> extra >>>>>>>> newline to the end of text files. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> So get a good editor. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Now why should he "get a good editor" if he can omit the >>>>>> closing tag? >>>>>> >>>>>> /Str. >>>>> Because leaving off the close tag can cause problems later when >>>>> someone else edits the site, assuming close tags are there. >>>>> >>>>> And leaving off a closing tag to get round an editor problem is >>>>> just plain sloppy programming. But we already know certain >>>>> people here don't care about that. >>>>> >>>> He has no editor problem, he can leave the closing tag off. >>>> Don't >>>> send him off in a goose chase. >>>> >>>> I knew who would not be comfortable with this easy solution. >>>> >>> Only because >>> >>> (a) he didn't know it >>> and >>> (b) I said it was useful. >>> >>> NOTHING is easier than typing a ?> and then following it with >>> a carriage >>> return.. >> >> How horrible. Are people really suggesting this hard to spot >> (when you >> dont know it) hack as a way to develop code? Leaving off closing >> tags?!?!? > > > It's not a 'closing tag' : its a switch to tell php to drop back > into 'spit out the source file raw' mode. I think of it in terms of HMTL tags <?php ?> Everything between the tags (including them) is replaced by an PHP eval of the contents. > If you don't ever want it to do that...it seems a valid > reasonable and apparently > valid-in-terms-of-the-language-as-specified way to do it. > > If the spec says its intrinsic to the language, a feature, it > can't be a hack can it? I subscribe to that. > How many people add semicolons to the last line of a CSS style > block definition? /Str.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Luuk <Luuk@invalid.lan> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-01-10 23:02 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: ommiting closeing tag in PHP [Re: this is my code i am not getting images throuh php script] |
| Message-ID | <a4put8-ida.ln1@luuk.invalid.lan> |
| In reply to | #4408 |
On 10-01-2012 22:31, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > Richard wrote: >> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes: >> >>> M. Strobel wrote: >>>> Am 10.01.2012 20:56, schrieb Jerry Stuckle: >>>>> On 1/10/2012 11:16 AM, M. Strobel wrote: >>>>>> Am 10.01.2012 13:54, schrieb Jerry Stuckle: >>>>>>> On 1/10/2012 7:33 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>>>>> Luuk wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 09-01-2012 23:08, M. Strobel wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Am 09.01.2012 23:04, schrieb Luuk: >>>>>>>>>>> On 09-01-2012 21:53, M. Strobel wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Just omit the closing tag in php-only files, it's easier >>>>>>>>>>>> than the >>>>>>>>>>>> ob_ functions. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> /Str. >>>>>>>>>>> If you re-checked, could you also provide us with a link to >>>>>>>>>>> where you >>>>>>>>>>> found that info? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> search string was php closing tag >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.basic-syntax.instruction-separation.php >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> /Str. >>>>>>>>> damn, they actually documented this UGLY feature ;) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ugly, but damed usefull as my editor has a habit of adding an >>>>>>>> extra >>>>>>>> newline to the end of text files. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> So get a good editor. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Now why should he "get a good editor" if he can omit the >>>>>> closing tag? >>>>>> >>>>>> /Str. >>>>> Because leaving off the close tag can cause problems later when >>>>> someone else edits the site, assuming close tags are there. >>>>> >>>>> And leaving off a closing tag to get round an editor problem is >>>>> just plain sloppy programming. But we already know certain >>>>> people here don't care about that. >>>>> >>>> He has no editor problem, he can leave the closing tag off. Don't >>>> send him off in a goose chase. >>>> >>>> I knew who would not be comfortable with this easy solution. >>>> >>> Only because >>> >>> (a) he didn't know it >>> and >>> (b) I said it was useful. >>> >>> NOTHING is easier than typing a ?> and then following it with a carriage >>> return.. >> >> How horrible. Are people really suggesting this hard to spot (when you >> dont know it) hack as a way to develop code? Leaving off closing >> tags?!?!? > > > It's not a 'closing tag' : its a switch to tell php to drop back into > 'spit out the source file raw' mode. > it's NOT a switch to tell php to drop back into some other mode... > If you don't ever want it to do that...it seems a valid reasonable and > apparently valid-in-terms-of-the-language-as-specified way to do it. > yes, something is specified > If the spec says its intrinsic to the language, a feature, it can't be > a hack can it? > it's not a hack > How many people add semicolons to the last line of a CSS style block > definition? i recently installed drupal on a (test)system when i do this: cd ....drupal $ grep -lir '?>' * | wc -l 124 $ find * -name "*.php" -type f | wc -l 151 (124 files with (at-least 1) closing tag, 151 files with the extension '.php') and not even all php-files have the '.php' extension..... $ grep -lr '<?php' * | wc -l 1000 (1000 files with the php-opening-tag) so, some 'programmers' seem to RELY on this behaviour ;-( -- Luuk
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-01-16 01:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: ommiting closeing tag in PHP |
| Message-ID | <3742193.Odxabdfos6@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #4407 |
Richard wrote: > The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes: >> M. Strobel wrote: >>> Am 10.01.2012 20:56, schrieb Jerry Stuckle: >>>> And leaving off a closing tag to get round an editor problem is >>>> just plain sloppy programming. But we already know certain >>>> people here don't care about that. >>> He has no editor problem, he can leave the closing tag off. Don't >>> send him off in a goose chase. >>> >>> I knew who would not be comfortable with this easy solution. >> >> Only because >> >> (a) he didn't know it >> and >> (b) I said it was useful. >> >> NOTHING is easier than typing a ?> and then following it with a carriage >> return.. > > How horrible. Are people really suggesting this hard to spot (when you > dont know it) hack as a way to develop code? Leaving off closing > tags?!?!? Your keyboard is borken. What exactly is your problem with avoiding the problem caused by adding the "closing tag"? It is the *P*HP *H*ypertext *P*reprocessor. It is *supposed* to output any character outside of <?php … ?> sections. PointedEars -- Sometimes, what you learn is wrong. If those wrong ideas are close to the root of the knowledge tree you build on a particular subject, pruning the bad branches can sometimes cause the whole tree to collapse. -- Mike Duffy in cljs, <news:Xns9FB6521286DB8invalidcom@94.75.214.39>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-01-11 15:51 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <4F0DA1DC.9060004@arnowelzel.de> |
| In reply to | #4377 |
The Natural Philosopher, 2012-01-09 20:33:
> M. Strobel wrote:
>> Am 09.01.2012 18:35, schrieb The Natural Philosopher:
>>> The minimal code is something like
>>>
>>> send_passport.php
>>> -----------------
>>> <?php
>>> header("Content-Type: image/jpeg");
>>> readfile("F:/Mydocuments/Certificates/Passport/Passport.jpg");
>>> ?>
>>> <<<...and no whitespace here!!!
>>>
>>> I mistrust using things that are designed for text strings for
>>> binary files.
>>
>> Why not leave off the ?> tag?
>>
>
> Is that php legal?
Yes.
> If so it would make life simpler
That's the reason, why this is often recommended.
--
Arno Welzel
http://arnowelzel.de
http://de-rec-fahrrad.de
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.php
csiph-web