Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.php > #14534
| From | "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.php |
| Subject | Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails |
| Date | 2014-11-11 16:27 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <m3tdce$fd0$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <m3t91i$rp6$1@dont-email.me> <m3t9et$t8s$1@dont-email.me> <m3tbjo$78r$1@dont-email.me> <m3tc0l$8ic$1@dont-email.me> |
"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message news:m3tc0l$8ic$1@dont-email.me... > On 11/11/2014 10:56 AM, James Harris wrote: >> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message >> news:m3t9et$t8s$1@dont-email.me... >>> On 11/11/2014 10:13 AM, James Harris wrote: >>>> From what I've found I understand that PHP constructors cannot return >>>> anything and that leads on to a specific query: if a piece of PHP code >>>> uses >>>> new as in >>>> >>>> $a = new b(); >>>> >>>> as long as no exception is thrown is $a guaranteed to hold something >>>> after >>>> the statement? Is it guaranteed to hold an object of the designated >>>> type? >>>> What happens if b's constructor "fails" in some way for various >>>> meanings >>>> of >>>> failure other than throwing exceptions? >>>> >>>> To put it another way, after the above instantiation statement which of >>>> these would be guaranteed to be true? >>>> 1) $a WILL contain a b object >>>> 2) $a could be NULL >>>> 3) $a might not exist (if it did not before the statement) >>>> >>>> Or does the answer depend on the specific class or on the version of >>>> PHP? >>>> >>>> Sorry that's a lot of questions. Just trying to make the query clear. >> >> ... >> >>> The first question is - how did the constructor "fail"? >> >> Any way you can imagine without throwing an exception. I was hoping there >> was a universal rule that could apply to all of PHP OO programming. >> > > No, specifically - how can it fail? > >> If you mean that a constructor cannot fail I don't agree. If you mean >> there >> are limited ways that a constructor can fail then I agree but for all and >> any of those means of failure what would be the effect on the object so >> constructed? >> >> If you want a specific, here's one. >> >> $db1 = new mysqli(...); >> if ($db1->connect_errno...) >> >> The instantiation can fail in a number of ways. Which of the scenarios >> labelled 1 to 3, above, will always be true when we reach the test >> statement? The test will baulk on two of them. ... > Specifically, how would the constructor fail? > > I'm not trying to give you a hard time. Are you sure? .... :-( > You can't answer what happens > in case of failure without understanding the failure itself. I think you may be talking about something else. I guess there are lots of ways a constructor can fail: out of memory, no access to a resource, invalid parameter value, incompatible parameters, disk IO error, network outage, invalid credentials, faulty program etc etc. Without knowing the internals of a particular constructor (not a good idea) your question about how that constructor can fail cannot be answered. Even if it could the answer(s) might change when a new version of that constructor is released. So there is no way to sensibly enumerate all potential causes of failure and derive findings from that. So rather than asking about a specific constructor I was looking to see if there was a PHP rule that could always be applied. If that's not what you mean can you explain what you have in mind? I cannot understand your meaning from what you have said so far. James
Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-11-11 15:13 +0000
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2014-11-11 10:20 -0500
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-11-11 15:56 +0000
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2014-11-11 11:03 -0500
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-11-11 16:27 +0000
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Matthew Carter <m@ahungry.com> - 2014-11-11 12:01 -0500
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2014-11-11 12:56 -0500
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2014-11-11 12:52 -0500
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-11-11 18:12 +0100
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2014-11-11 13:03 -0500
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-11-11 23:54 +0100
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-11-12 03:00 +0100
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Matthew Carter <m@ahungry.com> - 2014-11-11 22:25 -0500
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2014-11-11 22:36 -0500
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Matthew Carter <m@ahungry.com> - 2014-11-12 01:30 -0500
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2014-11-12 07:08 -0500
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-11-12 13:30 +0100
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2014-11-12 13:52 +0000
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-11-13 00:46 +0100
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2014-11-12 22:28 -0500
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-11-12 21:30 +0100
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-11-13 01:15 +0100
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-11-13 04:09 +0100
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2014-11-13 07:42 +0000
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-11-13 14:11 +0100
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-11-13 21:40 +0100
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-11-14 13:49 +0100
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-11-14 23:25 +0100
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2014-11-12 22:29 -0500
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-11-13 21:45 +0100
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2014-11-13 15:56 -0500
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-11-13 22:09 +0100
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2014-11-13 21:03 -0500
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-11-13 22:47 +0100
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-11-13 22:59 +0100
Re: OO PHP result of new if a constructor fails "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-11-18 19:02 +0100
csiph-web