Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.php > #9113

Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android

From Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.php
Subject Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android
Date 2013-04-19 17:58 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <kksefv$k8$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <kkrs3a$in1$1@dont-email.me> <5171A24A.7010903@arnowelzel.de> <5171A2C6.60209@arnowelzel.de> <kks7vo$hlu$2@dont-email.me> <5171A790.2010001@arnowelzel.de>

Show all headers | View raw


On 4/19/2013 4:22 PM, Arno Welzel wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle, 2013-04-19 22:06:
>
>> On 4/19/2013 4:02 PM, Arno Welzel wrote:
>>> Arno Welzel, 2013-04-19 22:00:
>>>
>>>> Jerry Stuckle, 2013-04-19 18:44:
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/19/2013 11:14 AM, Arno Welzel wrote:
>>>>>> Am 19.04.2013 14:09, schrieb Jerry Stuckle:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/19/2013 3:30 AM, Arno Welzel wrote:
>>>>>>>> Jerry Stuckle, 2013-04-15 04:05:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 4/14/2013 10:33 AM, Luuk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 14-04-2013 14:48, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/14/2013 3:46 AM, 23alagmy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://iamaspammer.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What does this have to do with PHP, SPAMMER?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> WHY is this message to comp.lang.php, comlaining that someone is
>>>>>>>>>> spamming here? The sender of this spammed message probably will not read
>>>>>>>>>> it anywayz........
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Maybe, maybe not.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But ignoring SPAM does not make it go away.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Nothing* makes spam go away except filtering it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your proof?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing will keep spammers from trying to send their stuff.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So filtering (or better rejecting) spam is the only reasonable solution
>>>>>> to avoid it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What's your proof, that spammers will stop, just because you tell them
>>>>>> you don't want their spam? How many spammers could you convince to stop
>>>>>> it by responding to their spam?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Your proof?
>>>>
>>>> Spam exists.
>>>>
>>>>> You made the claim that nothing will stop the spammers.  The only claim
>>>>> I made was that ignoring it will not stop the spammers.
>>>>
>>>> So what?
>>>>
>>>>> So what's your proof?
>>>>>
>>>>> And yes, I have gotten spammers websites and email accounts terminated.
>>>>>     Plus, if you've paid ANY attention, some spammers come back here and
>>>>> apologize for spamming.
>>>>
>>>> Then those people where not spammers - otherwise the would have apologized.
>>>
>>> Sorry - sent to early and typing to fast...
>>>
>>> So those people where not spammers - otherwise they would not have
>>> apologized since spammers *never* apologize to send spam.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Maybe *YOU* don't apologize for sending SPAM.  Some people do, when they
>> realize it IS spam.
>
> Then they are not spammers. They are just people who did a mistake.
>

According to YOUR definition.  Most of the rest of the world does NOT 
agree with you.

>> A spammer is a person who sends spam - not some subset like you want to
>> make them.  When the error of their ways is pointed out, some people
>> correct those errors.
>
> No - a "spammer" is a person who sends spam and does not care about the
> negative effects.
>
>> But then you have a VERY narrow view of who spammers are.  One which is
>> NOT shared by most of the world.
>
> The opposite is true - otherwise everybody would kindly ask every
> spammer to stop their business instead of using tools like
> SpamAssassing, greylisting, blacklisting etc.
>
>
>

No, YOU'RE the one with the VERY narrow view of who spammers are.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-04-14 08:48 -0400
  Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-04-14 16:33 +0200
    Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-04-14 22:05 -0400
      Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-04-19 09:30 +0200
        Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-04-19 08:09 -0400
          Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-04-19 17:14 +0200
            Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-04-19 12:44 -0400
              Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-04-19 22:00 +0200
                Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-04-19 22:02 +0200
                Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-04-19 16:06 -0400
                Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-04-19 22:22 +0200
                Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-04-19 17:58 -0400
                OT: What is a spammer (was: Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android) Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-04-20 10:02 +0200
                Re: OT: What is a spammer Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-04-20 07:48 -0400
                Re: OT: What is a spammer Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-04-20 08:24 -0400
                Re: OT: What is a spammer Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-04-20 14:36 +0200
                Re: OT: What is a spammer Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-04-20 08:42 -0400
                Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-04-19 16:05 -0400
  Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-04-19 17:16 +0200
    Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-04-19 12:44 -0400
      Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-04-19 22:03 +0200
        Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-04-19 16:08 -0400
          OT: Spam or not to spam (was: Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android) Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-04-19 22:27 +0200
            Re: OT: Spam or not to spam Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-04-19 17:59 -0400
            Re: OT: Spam or not to spam (was: Re: Microsoft accuses Google of pushing services to Android) Doug Miller <doug_at_milmac_dot_com@example.com> - 2013-04-19 22:17 +0000
            Re: OT: Spam or not to spam The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-04-20 01:31 +0100
              Re: OT: Spam or not to spam Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-04-19 21:02 -0400

csiph-web