Re: Why PHP?

Path	csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.php
Subject	Re: Why PHP?
Date	Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:43:19 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	29
Message-ID	<513CD447.4050007@arnowelzel.de> (permalink)
References	<17a9677a-3785-4b5f-a4cf-e78ffd5191a1@googlegroups.com> <khd60q$ueg$1@dont-email.me> <khdc28$jtf$2@news.albasani.net> <ecKdncXmiPM53KfMnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <513CAA86.5040606@arnowelzel.de> <khidrc$vjl$1@news.albasani.net>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Info	mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e8b13b93efe0c0294fd20051bd32ed64"; logging-data="1934"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19zfynzwBrHyqvAHqGLmvc/tsoT2IVgnLs="
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3
In-Reply-To	<khidrc$vjl$1@news.albasani.net>
Cancel-Lock	sha1:vGdMjOZwUGJmIDRBvSwiblh5sKo=
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.php:8628

Show key headers only | View raw

The Natural Philosopher, 2013-03-10 17:54:

> On 10/03/13 15:45, Arno Welzel wrote:
>> Robert Heller, 2013-03-08 20:53:
[...]
>>> Well Facebook is certainly an enterprise operation and is very
>>> profitable, which suggest that PHP is not a "toy".  Facebook has a huge
>>> user base and seems to manage quite well.  This suggests that LAMP
>>> servers scale well.
>>
>> Well - Facebook has enough money to run *many* servers. I think in this
>> case it is nearly irrelevant if they use PHP, C# or whatever - as long
>> as the backend (database, storage etc.) is capable of handling the load.
>>
>>
> The American solution. Throw money and hardware at sub standard software 
> ? :-)

Propably - yes ;-)

Anyway - i spend a while to get my own PHP installation on
<http://arnowelzel.de> to perform the way it does. "Out of the box" PHP
is neither "fast" nor "scalable".


-- 
Arno Welzel
http://arnowelzel.de
http://de-rec-fahrrad.de

Thread

Why PHP? clayjar@gmail.com - 2013-03-07 23:14 -0800
  Re: Why PHP? Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2013-03-08 01:03 -0800
  Re: Why PHP? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-03-08 08:45 -0500
  Re: Why PHP? Martin Leese <please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID> - 2013-03-08 10:11 -0700
    Re: Why PHP? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-03-08 18:53 +0000
      Re: Why PHP? Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2013-03-08 13:53 -0600
        Re: Why PHP? Richard Yates <richard@yatesguitar.com> - 2013-03-09 15:41 -0800
          Re: Why PHP? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-03-10 00:06 +0000
        Re: Why PHP? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-03-10 16:45 +0100
          Re: Why PHP? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-03-10 16:54 +0000
            Re: Why PHP? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-03-10 19:43 +0100
            Re: Why PHP? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-03-10 16:51 -0400
          Re: Why PHP? Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> - 2013-03-10 21:59 +0100
            Re: Why PHP? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-03-14 20:15 +0100
              Re: Why PHP? "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2013-03-14 23:50 +0100
  Re: Why PHP? "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2013-03-08 18:37 +0100
  Re: Why PHP? clayjar@gmail.com - 2013-03-08 21:38 -0800
    Re: Why PHP? Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2013-03-08 22:06 -0800
  Re: Why PHP? clayjar@gmail.com - 2013-03-08 21:46 -0800
    Re: Why PHP? "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2013-03-09 12:22 +0100
  Re: Why PHP? David Heller <daveh@allheller.net> - 2013-03-09 06:13 -0800
  Re: Why PHP? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-03-09 16:22 +0100

csiph-web