Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.php
Subject	Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast
Date	Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:36:18 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	51
Message-ID	<4F180E42.9010502@arnowelzel.de> (permalink)
References	<4f1378ee$0$16741$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <jevvqe$1gk$1@dont-email.me> <4f139498$0$16818$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <jf18lk$na6$1@news.albasani.net> <jf19m7$rbt$1@dont-email.me> <4F150E2E.80003@arnowelzel.de> <jf3sb5$nev$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Info	mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="KYiwCJH8Z2yKpLGgP5VBCw"; logging-data="22059"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18odsA0Uq9IiT5sEqVvNzYu3LX53i0/0KQ="
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
In-Reply-To	<jf3sb5$nev$1@dont-email.me>
Cancel-Lock	sha1:c0vXpALWN0+oR/WpDXGKktrh1Pc=
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.php:4517

Show key headers only | View raw

Jerry Stuckle, 2012-01-17 14:16:

> On 1/17/2012 12:59 AM, Arno Welzel wrote:
>> Jerry Stuckle, 2012-01-16 14:45:
>>
>>> On 1/16/2012 8:28 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>> lb wrote:
>>>>> jstucklex@attglobal.net wrote:
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> No, it is not. '0x12' is a hex number, not an integer. (int)'0x12'
>>>>>> converts this correctly to 0.
>>>>
>>>> Looks like Jerry doesn't know what an integer is either.
>>>>
>>>> A hex number of course *is* an integer, unless its a hex representation
>>>> of floating point.
>>>>
>>>> Killfile the prat like I have.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> 0x12 is not an integer.  It is a hexadecimal value.
>>
>> No, 0x12 (and *not* "0x12") is the hexadecimal *representation* of the
>> value 18. There is no thing like "hexadecimal value" and "0x12" is a
>> *string* and not a number at all.
>>
> 
> No, it is a hexadecimal value.  It may be an integer, it may be a
> character, it may be a set of flags... It does not have to be an integer.
> 
>> In fact PHP only knows to types of numbers: integers and floating point.
>> There is no "hexadecimal" data type.
>>
> 
> Excuse me - there is.  See hexdec().

<http://php.net/manual/en/function.hexdec.php>

You don't know what a data type is? Do you?

See <http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.types.php> and show me, where
the "hexadecimal data type" is explained.

m(


-- 
Arno Welzel
http://arnowelzel.de
http://de-rec-fahrrad.de

Thread

Implied cast differs from explicit cast lb <lb2048@pobox.com.delete> - 2012-01-16 01:10 +0000
  Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-15 20:51 -0500
    Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast lb <lb2048@pobox.com.delete> - 2012-01-16 03:08 +0000
      Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-15 22:39 -0500
        Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-01-16 08:42 +0100
          Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Curtis Dyer <dyer85@gmail.com> - 2012-01-16 09:04 +0000
          Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-16 08:25 -0500
            Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-16 19:51 +0100
      Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-16 13:28 +0000
        Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-16 08:45 -0500
          Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-01-17 06:59 +0100
            Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-01-17 07:00 +0100
              Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-17 08:17 -0500
            Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-17 08:16 -0500
              Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-01-19 13:36 +0100
                Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-01-19 13:39 +0100
                Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-19 09:06 -0500
                Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-19 09:05 -0500
                Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-19 15:01 +0000
                Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-19 14:41 -0500
  Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-16 09:49 +0100
  Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast "Álvaro G. Vicario" <alvaro.NOSPAMTHANX@demogracia.com.invalid> - 2012-01-16 11:48 +0100
    Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast lb <lb2048@pobox.com.delete> - 2012-01-17 02:35 +0000

csiph-web