Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.php > #4491
| From | Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.php |
| Subject | Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast |
| Date | 2012-01-17 06:59 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <4F150E2E.80003@arnowelzel.de> (permalink) |
| References | <4f1378ee$0$16741$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <jevvqe$1gk$1@dont-email.me> <4f139498$0$16818$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <jf18lk$na6$1@news.albasani.net> <jf19m7$rbt$1@dont-email.me> |
Jerry Stuckle, 2012-01-16 14:45: > On 1/16/2012 8:28 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> lb wrote: >>> jstucklex@attglobal.net wrote: >>>> ... >>>> No, it is not. '0x12' is a hex number, not an integer. (int)'0x12' >>>> converts this correctly to 0. >> >> Looks like Jerry doesn't know what an integer is either. >> >> A hex number of course *is* an integer, unless its a hex representation >> of floating point. >> >> Killfile the prat like I have. >> >> > > 0x12 is not an integer. It is a hexadecimal value. No, 0x12 (and *not* "0x12") is the hexadecimal *representation* of the value 18. There is no thing like "hexadecimal value" and "0x12" is a *string* and not a number at all. In fact PHP only knows to types of numbers: integers and floating point. There is no "hexadecimal" data type. > It can have the same bit pattern as an integer - but it can also have > the same bit pattern as a character (Ctrl-R, to be exact). Which also applies to the value 18 - this can also be the value of a character. Example: <?php $a = 0x12; print $a; ?> Result: Value of $a: 18, type of $a: integer So you see 0x12 *is* an integer. Of course "0x12" (including the quotes) is a string and *converting* the string to a number may need attention to the representation of the number within the string. -- Arno Welzel http://arnowelzel.de http://de-rec-fahrrad.de
Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Implied cast differs from explicit cast lb <lb2048@pobox.com.delete> - 2012-01-16 01:10 +0000
Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-15 20:51 -0500
Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast lb <lb2048@pobox.com.delete> - 2012-01-16 03:08 +0000
Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-15 22:39 -0500
Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-01-16 08:42 +0100
Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Curtis Dyer <dyer85@gmail.com> - 2012-01-16 09:04 +0000
Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-16 08:25 -0500
Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-16 19:51 +0100
Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-16 13:28 +0000
Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-16 08:45 -0500
Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-01-17 06:59 +0100
Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-01-17 07:00 +0100
Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-17 08:17 -0500
Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-17 08:16 -0500
Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-01-19 13:36 +0100
Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-01-19 13:39 +0100
Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-19 09:06 -0500
Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-19 09:05 -0500
Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-19 15:01 +0000
Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-19 14:41 -0500
Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-16 09:49 +0100
Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast "Álvaro G. Vicario" <alvaro.NOSPAMTHANX@demogracia.com.invalid> - 2012-01-16 11:48 +0100
Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast lb <lb2048@pobox.com.delete> - 2012-01-17 02:35 +0000
csiph-web