Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #34956 > unrolled thread

Re: x>y

Started by"Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de>
First post2018-05-01 13:32 +0200
Last post2018-05-06 03:52 -0700
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: x>y "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2018-05-01 13:32 +0200
    Re: x>y modular.products@googlemail.com - 2018-05-05 21:09 -0700
      Re: x>y Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-05-06 03:52 -0700

#34956 — Re: x>y

From"Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de>
Date2018-05-01 13:32 +0200
SubjectRe: x>y
Message-ID<pc9j87$n9s$1@solani.org>
On 01.05.2018 at 13:13, Stefan Ram wrote:

>   After the introduction of »<«, can we define
> 
> x>y  as y<x,
> x<=y as !(x>y), and
> x>=y as !(x<y)
> 
>   or are there any exceptions?
> 
>   (Assuming that the evaluation of »x« and »y« does not have
>   side-effects.)

NaN <= NaN // => false
NaN > NaN // => false

-- 
Christoph M. Becker

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#34986

Frommodular.products@googlemail.com
Date2018-05-05 21:09 -0700
Message-ID<a70d892b-0b4d-498f-9c62-42f87e7b0933@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#34956
On Tuesday, 1 May 2018 12:32:29 UTC+1, Christoph M. Becker  wrote:
> On 01.05.2018 at 13:13, Stefan Ram wrote:
> 
> >   After the introduction of »<«, can we define
> > 
> > x>y  as y<x,
> > x<=y as !(x>y), and
> > x>=y as !(x<y)
> > 
> >   or are there any exceptions?
> > 
> >   (Assuming that the evaluation of »x« and »y« does not have
> >   side-effects.)
> 
> NaN <= NaN // => false
> NaN > NaN // => false
> 
> -- 
> Christoph M. Becker

I don't understand why you posted this reply (I am a hobby programmer across multiple architectures since 1990), is this useful information? Or are you mocking the OP?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#34989

FromJulio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name>
Date2018-05-06 03:52 -0700
Message-ID<2d1ce673-e5cb-4a29-989e-f151ec369e28@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#34986
On Sunday, 6 May 2018 06:09:57 UTC+2, modular....@googlemail.com  wrote:
> On Tuesday, 1 May 2018 12:32:29 UTC+1, Christoph M. Becker  wrote:
> > On 01.05.2018 at 13:13, Stefan Ram wrote:
> > 
> > >   After the introduction of »<«, can we define
> > > 
> > > x>y  as y<x,
> > > x<=y as !(x>y), and
> > > x>=y as !(x<y)
> > > 
> > >   or are there any exceptions?
> > > 
> > >   (Assuming that the evaluation of »x« and »y« does not have
> > >   side-effects.)
> > 
> > NaN <= NaN // => false
> > NaN > NaN // => false
> 
> I don't understand why you posted this reply (I am a hobby programmer across multiple architectures since 1990), is this useful information? Or are you mocking the OP?

You cannot read since 1990's or you are yet another aspiring resident cunt
just mocking people who do have given decades to this discipline??

*Plonk*

Julio

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript

csiph-web