Re: x>y

Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript
Date	2018-05-06 03:52 -0700
References	<larger-20180501121113@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <pc9j87$n9s$1@solani.org> <a70d892b-0b4d-498f-9c62-42f87e7b0933@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID	<2d1ce673-e5cb-4a29-989e-f151ec369e28@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: x>y
From	Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name>

Show all headers | View raw

On Sunday, 6 May 2018 06:09:57 UTC+2, modular....@googlemail.com  wrote:
> On Tuesday, 1 May 2018 12:32:29 UTC+1, Christoph M. Becker  wrote:
> > On 01.05.2018 at 13:13, Stefan Ram wrote:
> > 
> > >   After the introduction of »<«, can we define
> > > 
> > > x>y  as y<x,
> > > x<=y as !(x>y), and
> > > x>=y as !(x<y)
> > > 
> > >   or are there any exceptions?
> > > 
> > >   (Assuming that the evaluation of »x« and »y« does not have
> > >   side-effects.)
> > 
> > NaN <= NaN // => false
> > NaN > NaN // => false
> 
> I don't understand why you posted this reply (I am a hobby programmer across multiple architectures since 1990), is this useful information? Or are you mocking the OP?

You cannot read since 1990's or you are yet another aspiring resident cunt
just mocking people who do have given decades to this discipline??

*Plonk*

Julio

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: x>y "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2018-05-01 13:32 +0200
  Re: x>y modular.products@googlemail.com - 2018-05-05 21:09 -0700
    Re: x>y Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-05-06 03:52 -0700

csiph-web