Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #29141 > unrolled thread

Re: "getElementsByTagName" and namespaces

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: "getElementsByTagName" and namespaces Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-04 15:37 -0300

#29141 — Re: "getElementsByTagName" and namespaces

On 04/01/16 13:55, Stefan Ram wrote:
> Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
> Subject: "foo" indecent?
> Message-ID: <foo-20160104172956@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
> 
>   I encounter the character sequence »foo« even in formal
>   technical documents (like the W3C DOM) today.
> 
>   Isn't »foo« an indecent word?
> 
>   Some persons like to use »foo« and »bar« in
>   technical examples as »meaningless words«.
> 
>   I assume that this »foo« and »bar« comes from »FUBAR«,
>   which in turn refers to a word that starts with »f« and
>   clearly /is/ indecent.
> 
>   Given that »foo« is hinting at this clearly-indecent
>   f-word, is it appropriate to use it in technical
>   recommendations that are intended to be read by people
>   of all kinds, genders and ages?

“I like offending people, because I think people who get offended should
be offended”
	Linus Torvalds.

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript

csiph-web