Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #29141
| From | Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: "getElementsByTagName" and namespaces |
| Date | 2016-01-04 15:37 -0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <n6ee16$qg8$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <namespaces-20160104175017@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> |
On 04/01/16 13:55, Stefan Ram wrote: > Newsgroups: alt.usage.english > Subject: "foo" indecent? > Message-ID: <foo-20160104172956@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> > > I encounter the character sequence »foo« even in formal > technical documents (like the W3C DOM) today. > > Isn't »foo« an indecent word? > > Some persons like to use »foo« and »bar« in > technical examples as »meaningless words«. > > I assume that this »foo« and »bar« comes from »FUBAR«, > which in turn refers to a word that starts with »f« and > clearly /is/ indecent. > > Given that »foo« is hinting at this clearly-indecent > f-word, is it appropriate to use it in technical > recommendations that are intended to be read by people > of all kinds, genders and ages? “I like offending people, because I think people who get offended should be offended” Linus Torvalds.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: "getElementsByTagName" and namespaces Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-04 15:37 -0300
csiph-web