Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #30022 > unrolled thread

Read binary file

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript

Contents

  Read binary file Herbert Kleebauer <klee@unibwm.de> - 2016-03-16 23:20 +0100
    Re: Read binary file Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-17 01:04 +0100
      Re: Read binary file Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 02:34 +0100
        Re: Read binary file Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-17 07:56 +0100
      Re: Read binary file Herbert Kleebauer <klee@unibwm.de> - 2016-03-17 08:31 +0100
        Re: Read binary file Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-17 19:10 +0100
          Re: Read binary file Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 19:59 +0100
            Re: Read binary file Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-17 21:43 +0100
              Re: Read binary file Herbert Kleebauer <klee@unibwm.de> - 2016-03-17 22:36 +0100
                Re: Read binary file Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-17 23:15 +0100
                Re: Read binary file Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 00:43 +0100
                  Re: Read binary file Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-18 17:22 +0100
                    Re: Read binary file Herbert Kleebauer <klee@unibwm.de> - 2016-03-18 21:14 +0100
                      Re: Read binary file Matthias Wiehl <mw@kwarg.de> - 2016-03-19 00:02 +0100
                        Re: Read binary file Herbert Kleebauer <klee@unibwm.de> - 2016-03-19 08:48 +0100
                          There is no javascript (was: Read binary file) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-19 13:02 +0100
                            Re: There is no javascript (was: Read binary file) Mark - <nonemail@spamspamapam.net> - 2016-03-19 14:33 +0000
                              Re: There is no javascript (was: Read binary file) Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-20 14:30 +1100
                                Re: There is no javascript (was: Read binary file) Mark - <nonemail@spamspamapam.net> - 2016-03-20 13:07 +0000
                            Re: There is no javascript (was: Read binary file) John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-03-20 10:39 +0000
                            Re: There is no javascript (was: Read binary file) John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-03-20 11:19 +0000
                              Re: There is no javascript (was: Read binary file) Philip Herlihy <thiswillbounceback@you.com> - 2016-03-21 17:06 +0000
                  Re: Read binary file Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 17:18 -0700
                    Re: Read binary file "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-03-23 10:12 +0100
                      Re: Read binary file John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-03-23 16:27 +0000
                        Re: Read binary file Herbert Kleebauer <klee@unibwm.de> - 2016-03-24 10:41 +0100
                          Re: Read binary file "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-03-24 11:14 +0100
                            Re: Read binary file John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-03-24 11:41 +0000
                              Re: Read binary file "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-03-24 13:36 +0100
                                Re: Read binary file John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-03-25 10:07 +0000
                                  Re: Read binary file "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-03-25 11:28 +0100
                          Re: Read binary file "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-03-24 11:31 +0100
                            Re: Read binary file Herbert Kleebauer <klee@unibwm.de> - 2016-03-24 12:34 +0100
                              Re: Read binary file "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-03-24 17:15 +0100
                          Re: Read binary file Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-03-24 11:33 +0000
                        Re: Read binary file "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-03-24 11:05 +0100
                      Re: Read binary file Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-23 20:16 -0700
                        Re: Read binary file "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-03-24 10:36 +0100
                          Re: Read binary file "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-03-24 11:18 +0100
                            Re: Read binary file Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 10:22 -0700
                              Re: Read binary file "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-03-28 00:18 +0200
                                Re: Read binary file Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 05:35 -0700
                                  Re: Read binary file "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-03-29 00:53 +0200
    Re: Read binary file Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-17 02:23 +0100
    Re: Read binary file Herbert Kleebauer <klee@unibwm.de> - 2016-03-17 08:42 +0100
    Re: Read binary file Dr J R Stockton <reply1600@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2016-03-20 22:03 +0000

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

#30121

Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> wrote on 27 Mar 2016 in 
comp.lang.javascript:

>> Thomas will be able to confirm my surmize 
>> that it means "zum Kotzen".
> 
> It's a reasonable guess, but not correct.  The expression is Latin, and,
> at least when used in English, means what I quoted earlier from Wikipedia,

[1] Utter nonsense, Latin text is just what it means in Latin, 
it cannot "be used in English or Swahili" having a differnet meaning,
as it would not be Latin then.

> something to the effect of "having continued so long as to be nauseating",
> usually applied to a conversation or an argument, with clear indications
> that the discomfort is not mere physical nausea.

Well, I never said my discription and the German "zum Kotzen" should be 
taken "only" in a physical way. 

In fact in German the sentense is also mostly used figuratively. 

But even if I had said or ment that, quod non, that does not make my [1] 
remark less strong and true. 

btw, this "quod non" is also just Latin, and not used "as in English".
 



-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#30130

Evertjan wrote:
> Scott Sauyet wrote:
>> Evertjan wrote:

>>> Thomas will be able to confirm my surmize  that it means "zum Kotzen".

>> It's a reasonable guess, but not correct.  The expression is Latin, and,
>> at least when used in English, means what I quoted earlier from Wikipedia,
> 
> [1] Utter nonsense, Latin text is just what it means in Latin, 
> it cannot "be used in English or Swahili" having a differnet meaning,
> as it would not be Latin then.

Utter nonsense.  All words, all phrases, all sentences take their meaning
from how people use them.  Regardless of what it meant to ancient Romans,
or how speakers of German or other languages use the phrase, when used by
English speakers, "ad nauseum" has the meaning they assign to it.  
Otherwise communication is impossible.

As a native speaker of English, one fairly widely read and one with a
reasonably strong vocabulary, I can confirm that the definition supplied
in Wikipedia is an accurate representation of how the phrase is used in
English.

Moreover, as the one who introduced "ad nauseum" to this conversation, I
can tell you that this is how I intended it.

  -- Scott

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#30145

Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> wrote on 28 Mar 2016 in 
comp.lang.javascript:

> Utter nonsense.  All words, all phrases, all sentences take their meaning
> from how people use them. 

So you are always right?

You must have been top of the class!

-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#30025

Stefan Ram wrote:

> Herbert Kleebauer <klee@unibwm.de> writes:
>>                     How can I avoid this violation or in
>>which other way can I read a binary file from a different
>>web server into a javascript array.
> 
>   The server can responds with »Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *«,
>   which means that the resource can be accessed by any domain
>   in a cross-site manner.
> 
>   See
> 
> developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Access_control_CORS

Context is important.  AIUI, he wants to access on *his* site B a *foreign* 
resource A without its author’s knowledge, meaning that the foreign resource 
does not have this header field set, and the original author cannot be 
convinced to have it set.  If it had it set, he would not have the SOP 
problem, and would not look for alternatives, in the first place.

-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#30029

On 17.03.2016 01:16, Stefan Ram wrote:


> developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Access_control_CORS

Thanks for the link.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#30065

In comp.lang.javascript message <nccmg2$kq7$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Wed, 16
Mar 2016 23:20:35, Herbert Kleebauer <klee@unibwm.de> posted:

>There is a picture (1.jpg) on web server A and I want to make
>a modified version available using a web server B. Because
>of copyright I can't just copy the picture, modify it and
>store it on server B. Instead a html file (test.htm) and
>a data file which describes how the picture has to be
>modified (diff.dat) is stored on server B. When a user
>loads the html file into his browsers, the javascript code
>loads the original picture from server A and the modification
>file from server B, changes the picture and displays it.
>
>I'm not familiar with javascript, but with help of Google
>I hacked together a few lines of code. But it only works if
>all three files are on the same server:

I think that this is not a JavaScript matter, since (a) JavaScript is
not the only language which a browser can use, (b) Browsers are not the
only possible hosts for JavaScript.

You should ignore that which is spouted here by the inadequately-
educated about copyright.  Copyright requires some sort of creative
effort in the part of the originator of the work, be it a person or a
corporate body; and a breach of copyright occurs when the product of
that creative work is copied with retention of the substance of that
creativity.  You have the right to make a creatively-composed bitmap
image of yourself and friends, and you will then hold the copyright.
That copyright will apply to conversions of the image into GIF, JPEG,
PNG, etc. (and into ink-on-paper); but it will not apply to the result
of doing a binary sort of a digital form - even though, for a
sufficiently-high resulution image, the result of the sort will be
almost always unique among binary files in general and sorts-of-images
in particular.

Additionally, while (to the best of my understanding) Copyright laws are
similar across most of the world, it is not safe to assume that they are
equivalent in all jurisdictions.

Have you considered the possibility or otherwise of doing what you want
in a .HTA page?  Or in Windows Script[ing] Host?  I have not, to any
significant extent.

-- 
 (c) John Stockton, Surrey, UK.  ¬@merlyn.demon.co.uk   Turnpike v6.05   MIME.
 Merlyn Web Site <                       > - FAQish topics, acronyms, & links.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript

csiph-web