Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #40381

Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021)

Show key headers only | View raw

I am not testing this use-case. But a related
use-case might highlight why speed did never
hurt anybody.

Lets say you program a flying drone with Python,
and the measurement is from the drone sensor
and communication systems.

Lets say you are using the idle time between
measurements for some complex planning. It
is then not true that you have anyway

to wait for the measurement.

Hope this helps!

BTW: If somebody knows another Python implementation
I am happy to test this implementation as well.
I am assuming that the standard Python python.exe

I tested amounts to CPython? Not sure. And the
GraalVM is practically the same as JPython? Not
sure either.

 > Opinion:   Anyone who is counting on Python for truly fast compute 
speed is probably using Python for the wrong purpose.  Here, we use 
Python to control Test Equipment, to set up the equipment and ask for a 
measurement, get it, and proceed to the next measurement; and at the end 
produce a nice formatted report.  If we wrote the test script in C or 
Rust or whatever it could not run substantially faster because it is 
communicating with the test equipment, setting it up and waiting for 
responses, and that is where the vast majority of the time goes. 
Especially if the measurement result requires averaging it can take a 
while.  In my opinion this is an ideal use for Python, not just because 
the speed of Python is not important, but also because we can easily 
find people who know Python, who like coding in Python, and will join 
the company to program in Python ... and stay with us.
 > --- Joseph S.

Mostowski Collapse schrieb:
> Meanwhile maintaining a JavaScript and
> Python version in parallel.
> 
> The Standard Python version of Dogelog runtime
> is annoyingly slow. So we gave it a try with
> andother Python, and it was 6x times faster.
> 
> We could test GraalVM. We worked around the missing
> match in Python 3.8 by replacing it with if-then-else.
> Performance is a little better, we find:
> 
> /* Standard Python Version, Warm Run */
> ?- time(fibo(23,X)).
> % Wall 3865 ms, gc 94 ms, 71991 lips
> X = 46368.
> 
> /* GraalVM Python Version, Warm Warm Run */
> ?- time(fibo(23,X)).
> % Wall 695 ms, gc 14 ms, 400356 lips
> X = 46368.
> 
> See also:
> 
> JDK 1.8 GraalVM Python is 6x faster than Standard Python
> https://twitter.com/dogelogch/status/1437395917167112193
> 
> JDK 1.8 GraalVM Python is 6x faster than Standard Python
> https://www.facebook.com/groups/dogelog
> 
> Mostowski Collapse wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> Ok a simple mark and sweep works, and
>> a simple trigger mechanism does the job:
>>
>> ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021)
>> https://qiita.com/j4n_bur53/items/17f86429745426bd14fd
>>
>> And we are 10x times faster than TauProlog! LoL
>>
>> Best Regards
> 

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2021-05-02 23:05 +0200
  Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mina Arvuti lähedal <ya12983@mail.com> - 2021-05-25 18:44 -0700
  Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2021-06-09 14:59 +0200
  Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-06-12 16:59 -0700
    Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-06-12 17:01 -0700
      Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-06-17 01:45 -0700
        Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2021-06-23 14:57 +0200
          Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-06-25 04:00 -0700
            Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-06-25 05:02 -0700
              Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-07-10 16:50 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-07-12 01:04 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-08-02 09:48 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-08-11 08:28 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-08-12 10:40 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-08-12 10:42 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 06:04 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-09-02 09:38 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-09-05 05:13 -0700
  Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2021-09-13 17:09 +0200
    Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2021-09-15 16:11 +0200
      Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2021-09-15 08:46 -0700
        Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2021-09-15 08:49 -0700
          Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2021-09-15 18:49 +0200
            Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-09-16 13:27 -0700
              Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-09-16 14:48 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-09-19 13:28 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-09-20 18:11 +0100
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-09-20 11:04 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-09-20 15:16 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 09:19 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 09:39 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 06:19 -0700

csiph-web