Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #40386

Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021)

Show all headers | View raw

The new release 0.9.6 is quite speedy:

"Maailman vaikein" 
850002400720000009004000000000107002305000900040000000000080070017000000000036040 
time(solve(Puzzle)) 
% Wall 41354 ms, gc 520 ms, 3143029 lips 
in Browser

See also:

Preview: New para/1 instruction for Dogelog runtime. (Jekejeke)
https://twitter.com/dogelogch/status/1438586282502983682

Preview: New para/1 instruction for Dogelog runtime. (Jekejeke)
https://www.facebook.com/groups/dogelog

Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Donnerstag, 16. September 2021 um 22:27:41 UTC+2:
> A friend just sent me a Web Sudoku made with Dogelog Runtime 
> https://gist.github.com/jburse/c85297e97091caf22d306dd8c8be12fe#gistcomment-3895696 
> 
> LoL
> Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Mittwoch, 15. September 2021 um 18:49:11 UTC+2: 
> > I am having a cross language problem. 
> > 
> > I really wonder why my Python implementation 
> > is a factor 40 slower than my JavaScript implementation. 
> > Structurally its the same code. 
> > 
> > You can check yourself: 
> > 
> > Python Version: 
> > https://github.com/jburse/dogelog-moon/blob/main/devel/runtimepy/machine.py 
> > 
> > JavaScript Version: 
> > https://github.com/jburse/dogelog-moon/blob/main/devel/runtime/machine.js 
> > 
> > Its the same while, if-then-else, etc.. its the same 
> > classes Variable, Compound etc.. Maybe I could speed 
> > it up by some details. For example to create an array 
> > of length n, I use in Python: 
> > 
> > temp = [NotImplemented] * code[pos] 
> > pos += 1 
> > 
> > Whereas in JavaScript I use, also 
> > in exec_build2(): 
> > 
> > temp = new Array(code[pos++]); 
> > 
> > So I hear Guido doesn't like ++. So in Python I use += 
> > and a separate statement as a workaround. But otherwise, 
> > what about the creation of an array, 
> > 
> > is the the idiom [_] * _ slow? I am assuming its 
> > compiled away. Or does it really first create an 
> > array of size 1 and then enlarge it? 
> > Julio Di Egidio wrote: 
> > > On Wednesday, 15 September 2021 at 17:46:15 UTC+2, Julio Di Egidio wrote: 
> > >> On Wednesday, 15 September 2021 at 16:11:48 UTC+2, Mostowski Collapse wrote: 
> > >> 
> > >>>> Opinion: Anyone who is counting on Python for truly fast compute 
> > >>> speed is probably using Python for the wrong purpose. 
> > >> You just don't know anything about this environment: those who need fast computation rather use *libraries* where all the performance critical parts are written in native code... and that's pretty customary in Python. 
> > >> 
> > >> That doesn't mean Python is flawless, indeed (IMO) it isn't in so many ways: to the point that, for more professional solutions in the maths/statistics realms in particular, people rather use R: yet, the primary reason is not so not so much performance but really the solidity/structure of the language per se... 
> > > 
> > > Good grief, I thought we were in comp-lang-python... You are indeed just *off-topic* here: I mean, an announcement for a JS-based engine is welcome, but you posting your Python implementation diary in this group is as off-topic as it can be. 
> > > 
> > > *Plonk* 
> > > 
> > > Julio 
> > >

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2021-05-02 23:05 +0200
  Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mina Arvuti lähedal <ya12983@mail.com> - 2021-05-25 18:44 -0700
  Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2021-06-09 14:59 +0200
  Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-06-12 16:59 -0700
    Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-06-12 17:01 -0700
      Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-06-17 01:45 -0700
        Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2021-06-23 14:57 +0200
          Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-06-25 04:00 -0700
            Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-06-25 05:02 -0700
              Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-07-10 16:50 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-07-12 01:04 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-08-02 09:48 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-08-11 08:28 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-08-12 10:40 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-08-12 10:42 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 06:04 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-09-02 09:38 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-09-05 05:13 -0700
  Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2021-09-13 17:09 +0200
    Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2021-09-15 16:11 +0200
      Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2021-09-15 08:46 -0700
        Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2021-09-15 08:49 -0700
          Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2021-09-15 18:49 +0200
            Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-09-16 13:27 -0700
              Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-09-16 14:48 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-09-19 13:28 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-09-20 18:11 +0100
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-09-20 11:04 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-09-20 15:16 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 09:19 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 09:39 -0700
                Re: ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021) Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 06:19 -0700

csiph-web