Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #39789

Re: Amazing

From The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: Amazing
Date 2021-03-27 19:07 +0000
Organization A little, after lunch
Message-ID <s3nvom$fth$3@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <d087f71d-9183-4438-bb6b-240bdf0e36c0n@googlegroups.com> <1b9143cb-1874-438d-b1c5-691fe9a0c867n@googlegroups.com> <s3mvlk$bkj$1@dont-email.me> <4a540cf4-fbe0-4529-91fc-a7b379328443n@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 27/03/2021 16:49, Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote:
> On Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 4:59:22 AM UTC-5, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> 
>> Well the same goes for audio.
>> By mashing the thing into object oriented format, the increase in
>> obscure documentation alone is tenfold, and the obscurity of the
>> 'objects' and 'classes' so produced is made satisfactorily
>> incomprehensible.
>>
>> It simply raises the barrier to entry for coding and keeps coders in work.
> 
> Do you have an actual argument against OOP directly or is it just ranting against bad code you've seen around the internet? Replacing OOP with some vague notion of unstructured, imperative+procedural programming is not an improvement..
> 

you can write unstructured bad code in any language

OO purpost to make it impossible. In fact a bad programmer will simply 
create bad objects and classes and fail to document them properly



-- 
It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
Mark Twain

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Amazing Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-03-27 00:57 -0700
  Re: Amazing Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-03-27 01:25 -0700
    Re: Amazing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-03-27 09:59 +0000
      Re: Amazing "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-03-27 09:49 -0700
        Re: Amazing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-03-27 19:07 +0000
          Re: Amazing John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-03-28 11:03 +0100
            Re: Amazing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-03-28 11:55 +0100
              Re: Amazing John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-03-28 15:12 +0100
                Re: Amazing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-03-28 20:02 +0100
        Re: Amazing John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-03-29 19:29 +0100
          Re: Amazing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-03-29 21:00 +0100
            Re: Amazing "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-03-29 13:44 -0700
              Re: Amazing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-03-29 22:01 +0100
                Re: Amazing "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-03-29 14:25 -0700
                Re: Amazing Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-03-31 00:42 +0200
                Re: Amazing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-03-31 07:13 +0100
            Re: Amazing John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-03-31 19:43 +0100
              Re: Amazing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-04-01 08:30 +0100
                Re: Amazing John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-04-01 18:02 +0100

csiph-web