Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #39790
| From | John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Amazing |
| Date | 2021-03-28 11:03 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <h0l06gdltpendgsb2v7ge3p2i542a2vsen@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <d087f71d-9183-4438-bb6b-240bdf0e36c0n@googlegroups.com> <1b9143cb-1874-438d-b1c5-691fe9a0c867n@googlegroups.com> <s3mvlk$bkj$1@dont-email.me> <4a540cf4-fbe0-4529-91fc-a7b379328443n@googlegroups.com> <s3nvom$fth$3@dont-email.me> |
On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 19:07:02 +0000, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >On 27/03/2021 16:49, Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote: <snip> >> Do you have an actual argument against OOP directly or is it just ranting against bad code you've seen around the internet? Replacing OOP with some vague notion of unstructured, imperative+procedural programming is not an improvement.. >> > >you can write unstructured bad code in any language > >OO purpost to make it impossible. Which PR company wrote that? You shouldn't believe every advert you see. >In fact a bad programmer will simply >create bad objects and classes and fail to document them properly Bad designers, encouraged by bad textbooks, will always find a way to do things clumsily, or worse. Incidentally, which "JavaScript" specification specifies an audio API? John
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Amazing Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-03-27 00:57 -0700
Re: Amazing Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-03-27 01:25 -0700
Re: Amazing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-03-27 09:59 +0000
Re: Amazing "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-03-27 09:49 -0700
Re: Amazing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-03-27 19:07 +0000
Re: Amazing John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-03-28 11:03 +0100
Re: Amazing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-03-28 11:55 +0100
Re: Amazing John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-03-28 15:12 +0100
Re: Amazing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-03-28 20:02 +0100
Re: Amazing John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-03-29 19:29 +0100
Re: Amazing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-03-29 21:00 +0100
Re: Amazing "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-03-29 13:44 -0700
Re: Amazing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-03-29 22:01 +0100
Re: Amazing "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-03-29 14:25 -0700
Re: Amazing Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-03-31 00:42 +0200
Re: Amazing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-03-31 07:13 +0100
Re: Amazing John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-03-31 19:43 +0100
Re: Amazing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-04-01 08:30 +0100
Re: Amazing John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-04-01 18:02 +0100
csiph-web