Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #9771
| From | Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: eval() or What? |
| Date | 2011-12-29 14:08 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <p2ppf7d7qp2frnllpjna3mp80cq3lnlpcv@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <fn8nf756jclubi6uu8510fcqjt57lhcd15@4ax.com> <9m1pc5F743U1@mid.uni-berlin.de> <9tgnf7ps2um6d8bubb8725kqlakckln11i@4ax.com> <9m4505F7d7U1@mid.uni-berlin.de> |
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 22:39:17 +0100, Jake Jarvis
<pig_in_shoes@yahoo.com> wrote:
[snip]
>That is not really what I was getting at, sorry for asking so indirectly.
>
>It reads like having two string value properties containing program code
>to be eventually evaluated one way or another is a given and not up to
>reconsideration, if that is indeed the case, why is that so?
It is simply the design that was most obvious. I did not exclude
anything else from consideration: look at my points 2 and 3 in my
original post.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
eval() or What? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-28 15:29 -0800
Re: eval() or What? Jake Jarvis <pig_in_shoes@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-29 01:08 +0100
Re: eval() or What? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-28 17:42 -0800
Re: eval() or What? Jake Jarvis <pig_in_shoes@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-29 22:39 +0100
Re: eval() or What? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-29 14:08 -0800
Re: eval() or What? Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2011-12-31 00:17 +0100
Re: eval() or What? Dr J R Stockton <reply1152@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2011-12-29 19:57 +0000
csiph-web