Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #9770
| From | Jake Jarvis <pig_in_shoes@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: eval() or What? |
| Date | 2011-12-29 22:39 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <9m4505F7d7U1@mid.uni-berlin.de> (permalink) |
| References | <fn8nf756jclubi6uu8510fcqjt57lhcd15@4ax.com> <9m1pc5F743U1@mid.uni-berlin.de> <9tgnf7ps2um6d8bubb8725kqlakckln11i@4ax.com> |
On 29.12.2011 02:42, Gene Wirchenko wrote: > On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 01:08:37 +0100, Jake Jarvis > <pig_in_shoes@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On 29.12.2011 00:29, Gene Wirchenko wrote: >>> Dear JavaScripters: >>> >>> I am writing an object for handling browser-side field >>> presentation and validation. Two of the properties will have string >>> values of code to be executed in order to do validation. The code >>> could be arbitrary, but it will probably be a function call with >>> parameters. >> <snip> >> >> Could you explain the step from 'writing an object for handling [...] >> presentation and validation' to 'will have string values of code to be >> executed in order to do validation'? > > I am defining an object called FieldItem. Two of the properties > are ValidationBasic and ValidationExtra. Each of these will hold code > for validation. > > My plan is to define many FieldItems and pick from these in > various pages to generate much of the DE code. Some of it is > validation code. (Yes, I will have server-side validation, too.) > > I already have a basic proof-of-concept, but now, I have to patch > up a few weaknesses. My validation spec was formerly in the input > control; now, I want it in the FieldItem object. > That is not really what I was getting at, sorry for asking so indirectly. It reads like having two string value properties containing program code to be eventually evaluated one way or another is a given and not up to reconsideration, if that is indeed the case, why is that so? -- Jake Jarvis
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
eval() or What? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-28 15:29 -0800
Re: eval() or What? Jake Jarvis <pig_in_shoes@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-29 01:08 +0100
Re: eval() or What? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-28 17:42 -0800
Re: eval() or What? Jake Jarvis <pig_in_shoes@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-29 22:39 +0100
Re: eval() or What? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-29 14:08 -0800
Re: eval() or What? Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2011-12-31 00:17 +0100
Re: eval() or What? Dr J R Stockton <reply1152@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2011-12-29 19:57 +0000
csiph-web