Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #30709
| Path | csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Impact of implicit arrays... |
| Date | Wed, 22 Jun 2016 11:55:23 +0200 |
| Organization | solani.org |
| Lines | 19 |
| Message-ID | <nkdna9$54f$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <njhj52$hl3$1@gioia.aioe.org> <4a1c28ea-447b-4e9b-9c75-68ef85c379e7@googlegroups.com> <njq6qn$qc3$1@gioia.aioe.org> <a1db3c29-049f-44a0-ae2d-e6c38776ddd7@googlegroups.com> <nkccds$mm6$1@dont-email.me> <nkce18$7cu$1@solani.org> <nkcf21$3ca$1@dont-email.me> <nkcf7i$3ca$2@dont-email.me> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | solani.org 1466589321 5263 eJwNysERACEIA8CWCASYlOOp9F+Ct+/NKNRuVhZzcnQ+cbfkZZh03rXGCEAbMtWfPE7cpptlPwlUD+Q= (22 Jun 2016 09:55:21 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@news.solani.org |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:55:21 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 |
| X-User-ID | eJwFwQkRwEAIBDBLMGUXkMPx+JfQBB+V7UbQcLix7JIwThXk8sWF5ual0N37bajOgrrBUvwjlBEd |
| In-Reply-To | <nkcf7i$3ca$2@dont-email.me> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:Hx+XJkm06gla8Viz2OBVbaJAEy8= |
| X-NNTP-Posting-Host | eJwNx8ERwDAIA7CVSsD4GIdAvf8IrX6Cp+UwEhkQFCWPphX/7NG8UpsXnnUuOXH8gu1XwtF+JG4Row== |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:30709 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 22.06.2016 at 00:31, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 6/21/2016 3:28 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> On 6/21/2016 3:10 PM, Christoph M. Becker wrote: >> >>> Then you might be interested in typed arrays, see, for instance, >>> <https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/JavaScript/Typed_arrays>. > > Although, why should I use full blown dynamic arrays, when these types > arrays will work fine? Humm, they almost have to be more efficient in > this respect. I presume they're more efficient, but I've never used them so can't tell. Most likely there are multiple benchmarks available on the web, and of course, you could do your own. -- Christoph M. Becker
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.com> - 2016-06-11 10:52 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-12 12:16 +0200
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.com> - 2016-06-13 12:23 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-06-13 22:00 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.com> - 2016-06-14 17:17 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-15 06:55 +0200
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-06-14 22:19 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-06-18 12:47 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-21 14:43 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-06-22 00:10 +0200
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-21 15:28 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-21 15:31 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-06-22 11:55 +0200
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-23 12:23 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-23 14:14 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-23 14:16 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-23 18:14 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-23 18:46 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-06-21 17:35 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-21 21:08 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-06-21 23:09 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-23 14:38 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-06-24 07:16 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-25 18:03 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-06-25 18:24 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-01 13:52 -0700
csiph-web