Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #30808
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Impact of implicit arrays... |
| Date | 2016-07-01 13:52 -0700 |
| Organization | n/a |
| Message-ID | <nl6l6u$k7j$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <994a5f96-b90f-4078-8626-543bf6a2e9e6@googlegroups.com> <nkhkt6$dfv$1@dont-email.me> <bc601b80-611c-4775-9343-f425f0de0326@googlegroups.com> <nkn9kd$kfc$1@dont-email.me> <fd54b793-af20-4c86-8c64-064fdba4bd24@googlegroups.com> |
On 6/25/2016 6:24 PM, Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote: > On Saturday, June 25, 2016 at 8:03:15 PM UTC-5, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> On 6/24/2016 7:16 AM, Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote: > >>>> What do you think of this? Is it a bit too contrived? >>> >>> What do the arrays represent in this case? Before it was [Re,Im] >>> >> >> x, y, z, w? I admit this is highly contrived wrt justifying arrays via >> looping... ;^o > > You can represent Complex Numbers as Matrices as well if you want. It's been 2 years or so since I did much Linear Algebra, so I'd have to brush up again on the subject to provide any insight if you go in that direction though. > > Basically given two Matrices: > > // 2x2 Identity matrix > var I = [ > 1, 0, > 0, 1 > ] > > // J**2 == -I > // eigenvalues(J) == [i, -i] where i = sqrt(-1) > var J = [ > 0, -1, > 1, 0 > ] > > You can represent the complex number a + bi instead as the matrix aI + bJ and get all the benefits of matrix operations. I would still suggest having an object to represent these of course. Ah yes. agreed. I think I like the array approach a little better because a user can pass a number like: foo.bar([.1, .2]) instead of: foo.bar(new complex(.1, .2)) This is contrived, but I have always liked arrays wrt storing x, y, z, w, ... like parameters.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.com> - 2016-06-11 10:52 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-12 12:16 +0200
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.com> - 2016-06-13 12:23 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-06-13 22:00 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.com> - 2016-06-14 17:17 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-15 06:55 +0200
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-06-14 22:19 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-06-18 12:47 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-21 14:43 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-06-22 00:10 +0200
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-21 15:28 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-21 15:31 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-06-22 11:55 +0200
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-23 12:23 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-23 14:14 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-23 14:16 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-23 18:14 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-23 18:46 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-06-21 17:35 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-21 21:08 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-06-21 23:09 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-23 14:38 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-06-24 07:16 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-25 18:03 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-06-25 18:24 -0700
Re: Impact of implicit arrays... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-01 13:52 -0700
csiph-web