Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #29146

Re: references to DOM parts

Show all headers | View raw

On 01/04/2016 22:17, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> So you call the above “occasional bickerings”?  Or is it instead that you 
> are such an obnoxious opportunist and hypocrite that you howl with the 
> wolves whenever it appears to be of advantage?  It is easier to bash one 
> person when you deem yourself to be in a group, is it not?  Coward.
> 
> All of you self-appointed “well-behaved users” quoted above, most of which 
> have not contributed regularly here for more than a month, are so 
> hypocritical and full of yourself, you do not even realize the amount of 
> *real* spam that you are continuing to produce here.

That's quite ironic, when most of the noise in this group is directly
caused by you. You invariably pick some unimportant detail (the spelling
of JavaScript, the name of the poster, the length of the attribution
line or signature, their code formatting, etc...) and then berate and
belittle the poster in the most offensive and condescending way you can.

When will you finally get it? NOBODY GIVES A SHIT about irrelevant
details like that. We want to talk about JavaScript (not how it's
spelled), but your patronizing behavior makes that very difficult. It
also drives away people who have better things to do than argue with a
bully on the internet.

Judging from the responses in the last few weeks, there appears to be a
broad consensus that your rudeness and pedantry are not appreciated
(with the possible exception of Andrew Poulos, who for some reason still
appears to mistake arrogance for authority). A normal person would take
the hint and try to adjust their behavior. A troll, on the other hand,
would take it as encouragement. Which are you?

> While other people continue to stay on topic for the most part,
> *despite* your evasive maneuvers, deliberate misquotations and
> misinterpretations, and personal attacks.

Don't you think it's disingenious to complain about personal attacks,
while calling another person "an obnoxious opportunist and hypocrite"
and a "coward" in the very same message?

> Because you have actually nothing of importance to say, not regarding
> the topic of this newsgroup at any rate.  Just go away, *please*.

I personally value JR's contributions much more than your repetitive
drivel. Is there some problem with your killfile? Getting a little
crowded in there? If you don't want to read his posts, just put him on
ignore, and add me while you're at it.

> F'up2 poster

Ignored. You don't get to write something like that and be spared the
consequences.


- stefan

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: references to DOM parts JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2015-12-31 11:47 +0700
  Re: references to DOM parts "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2015-12-31 11:11 +0100
    Re: references to DOM parts JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2015-12-31 21:15 +0700
      Re: references to DOM parts Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2015-12-31 13:35 -0300
        Re: references to DOM parts "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2015-12-31 19:19 +0100
          Re: references to DOM parts Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2015-12-31 15:41 -0300
            Re: references to DOM parts Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-12-31 21:23 -0200
            Re: references to DOM parts JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-01-01 06:54 +0700
              Re: references to DOM parts Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-01 03:36 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-01 17:30 +1100
                Re: references to DOM parts Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-01 10:31 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts "J.R." <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2016-01-03 00:37 -0800
                Re: references to DOM parts Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-03 20:10 +1100
                Re: references to DOM parts Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2016-01-03 03:32 -0800
                Re: references to DOM parts Mark - <nonemail@spamspamapam.net> - 2016-01-03 14:36 +0000
                Re: references to DOM parts Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-03 16:55 -0300
                Re: references to DOM parts Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-03 23:47 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-03 20:51 -0300
                Re: references to DOM parts Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-04 02:42 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-03 23:13 -0300
                Re: references to DOM parts Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2016-01-04 09:07 -0200
                Re: references to DOM parts Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-04 22:17 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 15:36 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-01-05 16:19 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2016-01-05 18:09 +0000
                Re: references to DOM parts "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-01-05 20:13 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 14:02 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-01-07 16:50 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-07 18:41 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-01-07 18:12 +0000
                Re: references to DOM parts Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-07 20:18 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-07 18:22 -0300
                Re: references to DOM parts John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-01-08 10:08 +0000
                Re: references to DOM parts Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2016-01-07 18:03 -0800
                Re: references to DOM parts Dr J R Stockton <reply1600@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2016-01-04 21:00 +0000
                Re: references to DOM parts "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-01-04 16:45 -0800
            Re: references to DOM parts Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-01 03:32 +0100
              Re: references to DOM parts Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-01 02:56 -0300
              Re: references to DOM parts Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2016-01-03 16:56 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-03 17:25 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2016-01-03 18:19 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-03 23:23 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2016-01-03 22:28 +0000
                Re: references to DOM parts Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2016-01-04 09:09 -0200

csiph-web