Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #29174

Re: references to DOM parts

Show all headers | View raw

On 5 January 2016 12:36:28 UTC-2, Stefan Weiss  wrote:
> On 01/04/2016 22:17, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> > So you call the above "occasional bickerings"?  Or is it instead that you 
> > are such an obnoxious opportunist and hypocrite that you howl with the 
> > wolves whenever it appears to be of advantage?  It is easier to bash one 
> > person when you deem yourself to be in a group, is it not?  Coward.
> > 
> > All of you self-appointed "well-behaved users" quoted above, most of which 
> > have not contributed regularly here for more than a month, are so 
> > hypocritical and full of yourself, you do not even realize the amount of 
> > *real* spam that you are continuing to produce here.
> 
> That's quite ironic, when most of the noise in this group is directly
> caused by you. You invariably pick some unimportant detail (the spelling
> of JavaScript, the name of the poster, the length of the attribution
> line or signature, their code formatting, etc...) and then berate and
> belittle the poster in the most offensive and condescending way you can.
> 
> When will you finally get it? NOBODY GIVES A SHIT about irrelevant
> details like that. We want to talk about JavaScript (not how it's
> spelled), but your patronizing behavior makes that very difficult. It
> also drives away people who have better things to do than argue with a
> bully on the internet.
> 
> Judging from the responses in the last few weeks, there appears to be a
> broad consensus that your rudeness and pedantry are not appreciated
> (with the possible exception of Andrew Poulos, who for some reason still
> appears to mistake arrogance for authority). A normal person would take
> the hint and try to adjust their behavior. A troll, on the other hand,
> would take it as encouragement. Which are you?
> 
> > While other people continue to stay on topic for the most part,
> > *despite* your evasive maneuvers, deliberate misquotations and
> > misinterpretations, and personal attacks.
> 
> Don't you think it's disingenious to complain about personal attacks,
> while calling another person "an obnoxious opportunist and hypocrite"
> and a "coward" in the very same message?
> 
> > Because you have actually nothing of importance to say, not regarding
> > the topic of this newsgroup at any rate.  Just go away, *please*.
> 
> I personally value JR's contributions much more than your repetitive
> drivel. Is there some problem with your killfile? Getting a little
> crowded in there? If you don't want to read his posts, just put him on
> ignore, and add me while you're at it.
> 
> > F'up2 poster
> 
> Ignored. You don't get to write something like that and be spared the
> consequences.
> 


Stefan, you deserve a double standing ovation.

--
Joao Rodrigues

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: references to DOM parts JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2015-12-31 11:47 +0700
  Re: references to DOM parts "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2015-12-31 11:11 +0100
    Re: references to DOM parts JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2015-12-31 21:15 +0700
      Re: references to DOM parts Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2015-12-31 13:35 -0300
        Re: references to DOM parts "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2015-12-31 19:19 +0100
          Re: references to DOM parts Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2015-12-31 15:41 -0300
            Re: references to DOM parts Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-12-31 21:23 -0200
            Re: references to DOM parts JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-01-01 06:54 +0700
              Re: references to DOM parts Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-01 03:36 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-01 17:30 +1100
                Re: references to DOM parts Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-01 10:31 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts "J.R." <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2016-01-03 00:37 -0800
                Re: references to DOM parts Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-03 20:10 +1100
                Re: references to DOM parts Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2016-01-03 03:32 -0800
                Re: references to DOM parts Mark - <nonemail@spamspamapam.net> - 2016-01-03 14:36 +0000
                Re: references to DOM parts Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-03 16:55 -0300
                Re: references to DOM parts Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-03 23:47 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-03 20:51 -0300
                Re: references to DOM parts Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-04 02:42 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-03 23:13 -0300
                Re: references to DOM parts Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2016-01-04 09:07 -0200
                Re: references to DOM parts Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-04 22:17 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 15:36 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-01-05 16:19 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2016-01-05 18:09 +0000
                Re: references to DOM parts "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-01-05 20:13 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 14:02 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-01-07 16:50 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-07 18:41 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-01-07 18:12 +0000
                Re: references to DOM parts Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-07 20:18 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-07 18:22 -0300
                Re: references to DOM parts John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-01-08 10:08 +0000
                Re: references to DOM parts Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2016-01-07 18:03 -0800
                Re: references to DOM parts Dr J R Stockton <reply1600@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2016-01-04 21:00 +0000
                Re: references to DOM parts "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-01-04 16:45 -0800
            Re: references to DOM parts Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-01 03:32 +0100
              Re: references to DOM parts Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-01 02:56 -0300
              Re: references to DOM parts Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2016-01-03 16:56 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-03 17:25 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2016-01-03 18:19 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-03 23:23 +0100
                Re: references to DOM parts Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2016-01-03 22:28 +0000
                Re: references to DOM parts Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2016-01-04 09:09 -0200

csiph-web