Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #28295
| From | danca <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically |
| Date | 2015-07-05 20:42 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <mnbtno$nkf$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <XnsA4CE7EFDAEC2Deejj99@194.109.6.166> <mnb1b7$foi$1@dont-email.me> <XnsA4CEB2A87F647eejj99@194.109.6.166> <mnbnet$v64$1@dont-email.me> <XnsA4CEC8E1D6BB7eejj99@194.109.6.166> |
Il 07/05/2015 07:44 PM, Evertjan. ha scritto: > danca <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> wrote on 05 Jul 2015 in > comp.lang.javascript: > >> Pardon, but if [and we are] talking about "agreement of others" the >> point is "agreement of others" that implies judgement [of others]. > > No. It just means that others agree, which is not a judgement, > nor does it mean that they are right. > You are short on demonstrate that to agree is not a judgement, nor via logic nor via psychology. What do you think it is "to agree"?. "Accept without criticism" is what you seems to think about. Maybe we are having some semantic misunderstanding. "To agree" means usually that someone evaluates and then takes the decision to side on the agreed concept/sentence/idea, "to accept", or "to submit himself" or some other phrasing that makes clear that one is prone to someone other's judgement and does not put a single word in between is not "to agree" AFAIK. > Being right is not a result of judgement, btw. > You seems to think that absolute values exist. To be concrete, consider that if you are the only one that says one thing, against the world, you are actually wrong. No matter if in a couple of centuries the world possibly will admit your rightness. You'll get burned the same as Savonarola, in between. And after another couple of centuries they will again say that you were wrong... >> Agreement or disagreement needs judgement, no? > > No. It is just a statement. I don't follow you [and I am answering, offtopic, because I know about the tolerance this NG always showed to off-topics] > > However, agreement and disagreement are not important, > as they mean only something in authority thinking, > and sometimes by dogmatic thinking. > As I was supposing, we are on different positions about the meaning of "to agree". > Truth can only be hoped for by comparing arguments, > and shifting those arguments by analizing other aarguments. For sure, and keeping in mind the relative meaning of "Truth" > > You still and so wrongly assume that something is true > because the number that think it is, is large. Idealism vs. realism. >> My ability to learn from discussions comes from the ability to extract >> the relevant parts, from not thinking that anyone has the "truth" in his >> pockets and from the inclination to not to be too serious in general [ >> and in major, too :-) ] about bytes and bites spreaded all around from >> an human being to other human beings. > > You seem to think highly of yourself, and your abilities. This seems [from a cold point of view] an ad-hominem argument, a personal attack, a pointless and gratuitous consideration. Come on, you can do better! [a backfiring ad-personam counter-argument, I know]. > > So you think if someone sounds more serious to you, and less irritating, his > arguments must be better? Interesting. It's part of our human nature. Yes, we tend to react to harsh impositions and to accept mellow lies. Here should make its case the rationality [logic]. > > Wat nonsense, one should, imho, measure arguments on their inner contents, > on their logic, and on the basis of the validity of facts and probabilities > such arguments use as a base. > > Agreed [after thinking, evaluating, and found no objections :-) ]. Dan
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Best way to show create different elements dynamically JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2015-07-05 01:02 +0100
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2015-07-05 01:06 +0100
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-05 09:27 +0200
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2015-07-05 10:04 +0100
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically danca <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-07-05 10:10 +0200
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-05 10:22 +0200
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically danca <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-07-05 11:43 +0200
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-05 13:16 +0200
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2015-07-05 12:48 +0100
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically danca <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-07-05 14:47 +0200
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-05 16:03 +0200
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically danca <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-07-05 19:53 +0200
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-06 01:46 +0200
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically "danca (Daniele Campagna)" <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-07-06 07:29 +0200
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2015-07-05 13:17 +0200
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2015-07-05 10:38 +0200
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2015-07-05 10:01 +0100
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2015-07-05 10:11 +0100
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-05 11:17 +0200
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2015-07-05 11:26 +0200
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2015-07-05 10:30 +0100
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2015-07-05 10:33 +0100
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2015-07-05 12:29 +0200
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically danca <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-07-05 12:38 +0200
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2015-07-05 17:33 +0200
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically danca <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-07-05 18:55 +0200
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2015-07-05 19:44 +0200
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically danca <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-07-05 20:42 +0200
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2015-07-05 21:01 +0200
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2015-07-05 13:00 +0100
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-05 16:13 +0200
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-07-05 15:23 +0100
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2015-07-05 15:57 +0100
Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2015-07-05 10:03 +0100
csiph-web