Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #28293

Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically

From danca <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically
Date 2015-07-05 19:53 +0200
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <mnbqrr$cgc$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <359025142.IYVrofH7X8@PointedEars.de> <mnau4c$5dg$1@dont-email.me> <5889831.4kO5l0emlv@PointedEars.de> <mnb8t3$9ie$1@dont-email.me> <33401923.tZnueLQKRv@PointedEars.de>

Show all headers | View raw


Il 07/05/2015 04:03 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn ha scritto:

>> In other words... are you aware of conditions that can reasonably cause
>> createElement() to fail [if implemented]?
>
> Good question.  Yes, this is a factory method; instantiation of an object
> can fail for various reasons.
>
> However, it should be noted that none of W3C DOM Core Level 1, W3C DOM Level
> 2 Core, W3C DOM Level 3 Core, W3C HTML5, and WHATWG HTML fully specifies
> what should happen in this case.  HTML5/WHATWG HTML only implicitly
> specifies that an interface for an unknown element type should be used if
> the element type name is unsupported, which is precisely what happens in
> HTML5 browsers [they use HTMLUnknownElement].

Which various reasons??? You are scaring me a bit.
I have some script around relying heavily on createElement, and I'm not 
sure to have implemented a "graceful downgrade" or whatever. 
"document.createElement must work or you can trash your browser" - that 
is the actual state of things [in my scripts].

>>
>> Tried on Firefox 29 on Kernel 2.6.37.6 (Slackware 13.37/64) - best
>
> You should say _Linux_ 2.6.37.6.  There are many kernels.

Oh yes, I played wit DOS, DRDOS, AmigaOs, TOS, Real/32, AROS, Syllable, 
OS/2, Novell 3.12 & 5, and Android and MacOs, and... But the word 
"*Slackware*" clarifies every doubt one can have. It means only one 
thing: LINUX. :-) [Debian, Suse, RedHat too, with the only possible 
exception of the song "Panama Red" from Seldom Scenes, and a sloppy 
neuron fuzzy on RedHat).

>
> Have you also tested each approach 5 times in random order?

No, I'll try, and I have a Kernel 3.something (Ubuntu 12.04) on a test 
machine to tinker with before to put in producton Slackware 14.1 64-bits 
(also a 3.x kernel).
[I'm testing mainly SAMBA with old ISAM databases-a mess]

>
>> And 180 msec vs 100 msec is the overall difference between fastest vs.
>> slowest method.
>
> Even a difference of 80 milliseconds becomes significant if the algorithm
> taking 80 milliseconds longer than another one is repeated.
>

Agreed. You are talking to a man that saves every bit and every cycle 
where/if possible. I started with a 1-Kb "computer", Sinclair ZX-81.
You never really escape from your imprinting :-)

>> [One sidenote: why the hell you insist on real names? Are you immune by
>> spam?]
>
> Posting using a pseudonym does not affect the amount of spam one is getting.
> How did you get that idea?  Spam is sent to mailboxes referenced by *e-mail
> addresses*; not to specific people.  To use an analogy: if you remove your
> name from your real-life mailbox, or put a false name on it, that does not
> change the location of your home.
>

[OT - but not so much] ?! I think I could easily write a bot that reads 
addresses from the newsgroups, less easily to write one that elaborates 
the fake addresses (apart the "at" trick). Please [if you have time] 
elaborate.

[Edit] A doubt: are you referring to "DanCa" or to the fake mail 
address? What's wrong with nicknames? Sorry if it's a silly question but 
I have no problem at all to put my name, surname, face and Fiscal Code 
Number, if needed. From the Eighties anyway I use nicknames and it has 
always been just "normal" to do it this way.

> There is no good reason to believe that posting with a real name increases
> the amount of spam one is getting.  It does increase, however, the amount of
> people who can take you seriously.
>
:-) YOU are taking me seriously, anyway [this time] [it seems]. This 
contradicts your last sentence! [joking]

Dan

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Best way to show create different elements dynamically JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2015-07-05 01:02 +0100
  Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2015-07-05 01:06 +0100
    Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-05 09:27 +0200
      Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2015-07-05 10:04 +0100
    Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically danca <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-07-05 10:10 +0200
      Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-05 10:22 +0200
        Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically danca <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-07-05 11:43 +0200
          Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-05 13:16 +0200
            Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2015-07-05 12:48 +0100
            Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically danca <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-07-05 14:47 +0200
              Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-05 16:03 +0200
                Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically danca <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-07-05 19:53 +0200
                Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-06 01:46 +0200
                Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically "danca (Daniele Campagna)" <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-07-06 07:29 +0200
        Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2015-07-05 13:17 +0200
    Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2015-07-05 10:38 +0200
      Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2015-07-05 10:01 +0100
      Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2015-07-05 10:11 +0100
        Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-05 11:17 +0200
        Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2015-07-05 11:26 +0200
          Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2015-07-05 10:30 +0100
          Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2015-07-05 10:33 +0100
            Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2015-07-05 12:29 +0200
              Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically danca <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-07-05 12:38 +0200
                Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2015-07-05 17:33 +0200
                Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically danca <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-07-05 18:55 +0200
                Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2015-07-05 19:44 +0200
                Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically danca <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-07-05 20:42 +0200
                Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2015-07-05 21:01 +0200
              Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2015-07-05 13:00 +0100
                Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-05 16:13 +0200
                Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-07-05 15:23 +0100
                Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2015-07-05 15:57 +0100
  Re: Best way to show create different elements dynamically JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2015-07-05 10:03 +0100

csiph-web