Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #26881

Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript
Date Sat, 21 Feb 2015 01:56:40 +0100
Organization solani.org
Lines 11
Message-ID <mc8l3u$kad$1@solani.org> (permalink)
References <JavaScript-20150204202621@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <b290acf4-c7be-49a8-9396-f0225386078d@googlegroups.com> <1843703.7QeMqOPspv@PointedEars.de> <59a1a1bf-a981-43d6-aa1d-2244f9ba5b4e@googlegroups.com> <mbbg5k$nr0$1@solani.org> <e443570d-5e85-4603-bd92-0cf6837732d6@googlegroups.com> <mc0mel$hj2$1@solani.org> <15981767-0c16-4e7c-964a-5ce3f7c4044c@googlegroups.com> <0231943a-6f4e-4b72-b283-b664b60bffdd@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace solani.org 1424480190 20813 eJwFwQERADEIAzBLMNZyyOkD8y/hEwSdnZfgxcNjeMBU7CFi9YV8GJUaraF1uhIyKN+enh8YLxGA (21 Feb 2015 00:56:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To abuse@news.solani.org
NNTP-Posting-Date Sat, 21 Feb 2015 00:56:30 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
X-User-ID eJwFwYEBwCAIA7CXxJai5wiD/09Y4pCpgnLRx+eWk8DwcHfHIj3DpJWoRr8kbG2eD+wH3B8D9hA4
In-Reply-To <0231943a-6f4e-4b72-b283-b664b60bffdd@googlegroups.com>
Cancel-Lock sha1:O3mpMup+hr6l35FJKvol35QNn+k=
X-NNTP-Posting-Host eJwFwQkBwDAIA0BLfIEiB7LWv4TdwVOTFYkMPDxlueCML8tuNcQqDHOVVz8JcAFZTk632fkBC/UQkQ==
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:26881

Show key headers only | View raw

Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote:

> Though TBH, I see as much complaining about PEs posts as I see his on
> corrections, so take that for what it's worth. Either way, the S/N
> ratio is wrong.

I have to agree.  However, excluding these posts doesn't seem to improve
the signal-to-noise-ratio on c.l.js, unfortunately.

-- 
Christoph M. Becker

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript Charles Cossé <ccosse@gmail.com> - 2015-02-04 11:47 -0800
  Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-02-07 16:31 +0100
    Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2015-02-07 18:41 -0800
      Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-02-08 10:13 +0000
        Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2015-02-09 14:32 -0800
          Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-02-09 22:44 +0000
      Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2015-02-10 00:34 +0100
        Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2015-02-10 14:01 -0800
          Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2015-02-18 01:30 +0100
            Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2015-02-18 13:11 -0800
              Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2015-02-20 11:35 -0800
                Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2015-02-21 01:56 +0100
                Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-02-21 16:53 +0100
              Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2015-02-21 01:41 +0100
        Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-02-21 17:37 +0100

csiph-web