Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #26883
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript |
| Date | 2015-02-21 17:37 +0100 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <11409371.vLMhksEnQf@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <JavaScript-20150204202621@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <b290acf4-c7be-49a8-9396-f0225386078d@googlegroups.com> <1843703.7QeMqOPspv@PointedEars.de> <59a1a1bf-a981-43d6-aa1d-2244f9ba5b4e@googlegroups.com> <mbbg5k$nr0$1@solani.org> |
Christoph M. Becker wrote: > Scott Sauyet wrote: >> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>> [ ... ] [T]here is no "javascript"; certainly there is no such >>> thing as "valid javascript" [ ... ] >> >> <http://i.imgur.com/5UhdL.png> > > Isn't it worthwhile to hint at the uncommon spelling of the word > "javascript" (at least)? The point here is that there cannot be a universally agreed definition as to what constitutes “valid javascript” because even if we accept the fact that ”javascript” stands in for “ECMAScript implementations” (which I recommend against because of ambiguity), those implementations *differ*: That which is *syntactically* valid (i.e. compiles) in one implementation does not need to be in another (as a case in point, we discussed the use of “`…`” for template strings in Mozilla JavaScript – not supported elsewhere [as of yet]; there are many other such examples). So the notion of “valid javascript” can only be called nonsense, employed only by the un(der)informed or blatantly ignorant. -- PointedEars FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/> Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript Charles Cossé <ccosse@gmail.com> - 2015-02-04 11:47 -0800
Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-02-07 16:31 +0100
Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2015-02-07 18:41 -0800
Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-02-08 10:13 +0000
Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2015-02-09 14:32 -0800
Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-02-09 22:44 +0000
Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2015-02-10 00:34 +0100
Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2015-02-10 14:01 -0800
Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2015-02-18 01:30 +0100
Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2015-02-18 13:11 -0800
Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2015-02-20 11:35 -0800
Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2015-02-21 01:56 +0100
Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-02-21 16:53 +0100
Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2015-02-21 01:41 +0100
Re: Definition of a script in JavaScript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-02-21 17:37 +0100
csiph-web