Re: ECMAScript and classes

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	"Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript
Subject	Re: ECMAScript and classes
Date	Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:48:04 +0100
Organization	solani.org
Lines	23
Message-ID	<m42nbt$bh9$1@solani.org> (permalink)
References	<dtac4adh7n65csjtrqt7lg59tbkfdv01kd@4ax.com> <m25fv6$kmt$1@solani.org> <2243270.nPrEYIu7m9@PointedEars.de> <853i4a5opg36165ev602k2rhrsigpjlanl@4ax.com> <5228816.s9PhMjcOHp@PointedEars.de> <td9f5a9f08ameij4n0610eg187jj41suke@4ax.com> <23998077.8isvcokmAf@PointedEars.de> <dsj16apqju2hj2e02tvb9von9ukghmr0uk@4ax.com> <m3qr37$pp4$1@solani.org> <pcr36ah1aea8cihc4gkdpccubdia88jh8l@4ax.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Trace	solani.org 1415897277 11817 eJwNyNEVADEEBMCWLBbXzhH9l5C8+RtaIDo9GM59dKq2QBWHjbk3ZAToFcJo8qJz8Z8vj/oF+KMP9g== (13 Nov 2014 16:47:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	abuse@news.solani.org
NNTP-Posting-Date	Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:47:57 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
X-User-ID	eJwNysEBwCAIA8CVAgZo1lGb/Udo7321OvoMu5rlskwZWIGTFzezOLLUyZx9+ATCW5D85j8/AGIQHg==
In-Reply-To	<pcr36ah1aea8cihc4gkdpccubdia88jh8l@4ax.com>
Cancel-Lock	sha1:md4rI18v72DgIxeeiU4suGbX2hU=
X-NNTP-Posting-Host	eJwFwQkBwDAIA0BLKU8YcqAU/xJ258rDG0an+fqmivW8WjnzbPZm9GoKa6QYnQKwBcpAAd8PLBEQ8Q==
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:26132

Show key headers only | View raw

John Harris wrote:

> On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:02:31 +0100, "Christoph M. Becker"
> <cmbecker69@arcor.de> wrote:
> 
>> In <news:td9f5a9f08ameij4n0610eg187jj41suke@4ax.com> you have said:
>>
>> | A language where class instances have no instance data is so
>> | restrictive that I don't believe anyone would pay money to use it.
> 
> Why do you think that I'm talking about ECMAScript rather than a
> hypothetical and very useless language?

Because you had responded to Thomas' statement:

| That depends on how you define “class”.  The same as it is
| unreasonable to define OOP solely by the features of OOP present in,
| e.g., Java, it is unreasonable to define “class” only as it is used
| elsewhere, and then deny the existence of “classes” or “full support
| for classes” in an (draft) Edition of ECMAScript.

-- 
Christoph M. Becker

Thread

ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-21 10:49 +0100
  Re: ECMAScript and classes Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2014-10-21 12:25 +0200
    Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-23 11:34 +0100
  Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-10-21 13:27 +0200
    Re: ECMAScript and classes Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-10-21 19:27 +0200
      Re: ECMAScript and classes Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2014-10-22 00:15 +0200
      Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-10-23 14:45 +0200
      Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-23 15:12 +0100
        Re: ECMAScript and classes Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-11-01 20:59 +0100
          Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-11-03 15:56 +0000
            Re: ECMAScript and classes Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-11-08 19:11 +0100
              Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-11-10 14:48 +0000
                Re: ECMAScript and classes Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-11-10 15:54 +0000
                Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-11-10 18:02 +0100
                Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-11-11 11:08 +0000
                Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-11-13 17:48 +0100
                Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-11-13 20:32 +0000
                Re: ECMAScript and classes Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-11-10 23:03 +0100
                Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-11-11 17:03 +0000
    Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-23 14:58 +0100
      Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-10-23 18:37 +0200
        Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-24 11:30 +0100
          Re: ECMAScript and classes "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-10-24 19:45 +0200
            Re: ECMAScript and classes John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-10-26 10:43 +0000

csiph-web